AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive victory for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in the two shared benchmark tests. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti scores 212,363 against the Radeon Pro 575's 34,596, a margin of 513.8%. That is more than six times the raw score, a gap that reflects the generational and architectural chasm between these two products. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti posts 225,122 versus 37,878, a 494.3% advantage. Both tests are compute-oriented, and the NVIDIA part leads by roughly five to six times in each.

The RTX 5070 Ti also carries a much higher average benchmark score of 49,957 across its full test suite, while the Radeon Pro 575 averages 39,555. However, the head-to-head comparison only includes two overlapping tests, so the average figures pull from different test sets. The percentile placement tells a similar story: the RTX 5070 Ti sits at the 86th percentile of all GPUs in the database, while the Radeon Pro 575 sits at the 82nd. That is a smaller gap than the raw benchmark deltas suggest, because the Radeon Pro 575's percentile is computed against a different, older pool of entries.

Looking at the nearest rivals for each card, the RTX 5070 Ti's average score of 49,957 places it within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX Vega 64 (50,001), and 0.4% ahead of the Intel Arc A550M (49,737). It trails the RX 6900 XT by 2% (50,951) and leads the RX 6800 XT by 3.1% (48,477). The Radeon Pro 575's average of 39,555 is essentially tied with the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568, 0% delta), 1.1% ahead of the Radeon Pro 575X (39,116), 1.3% behind the Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40,063), and 1.9% behind the Radeon Pro 580 (40,318). So the Pro 575 is competitive within its immediate peer group of mobile and workstation parts, but the RTX 5070 Ti operates in an entirely different performance stratum.

The head-to-head win count is 2 for the RTX 5070 Ti and 0 for the Radeon Pro 575. No test in the shared set goes the other way. The delta percentages (513.8% and 494.3%) are so large that they dwarf any normal generational improvement. This is not a close contest by any measured metric.

Architecture Differences

The underlying silicon tells the full story. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti uses the GB203 chip, built on TSMC's 5 nm process with Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The AMD Radeon Pro 575 uses the Ellesmere chip, built on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm process with GCN 4.0 architecture. The process node difference alone, 5 nm versus 14 nm, explains much of the efficiency and density gap. The RTX 5070 Ti packs 45,600 million transistors into a 378 mm² die, yielding 120.6 million transistors per mm². The Radeon Pro 575 has 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, just 24.6 million per mm². That is a 4.9x density advantage for the NVIDIA part.

Core counts follow the same pattern. The RTX 5070 Ti has 8,960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units, and 96 ROPs. The Radeon Pro 575 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The NVIDIA card also features 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, while the AMD card has neither field populated, meaning it lacks dedicated hardware for ray tracing and tensor operations. The FP32 compute throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS on the RTX 5070 Ti versus 4.489 TFLOPS on the Radeon Pro 575, a 9.8x difference. FP16 is identical to FP32 on both cards (1:1 ratio), so the same margin applies there.

Memory subsystems diverge sharply. The RTX 5070 Ti ships with 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 575 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, with 217.0 GB/s. The bus width is the same, but the memory generation and capacity create a 4.1x bandwidth gap. Clock speeds are not directly comparable because the AMD card lists no base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), while the NVIDIA card runs a 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost with memory at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective).

The RTX 5070 Ti supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Radeon Pro 575 uses PCIe 3.0 x16. API support also differs: the NVIDIA card reaches DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4; the AMD card tops out at DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The NVIDIA card's display outputs include one HDMI 2.1b and three DisplayPort 2.1b, while the AMD card's outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its target use case in laptops and all-in-one systems. The Radeon Pro 575 is an MXM module with no power connectors and a 150 W TDP; the RTX 5070 Ti is a dual-slot card with a single 16-pin connector and a 300 W TDP.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti wins everywhere the data records a comparison. In OpenCL and Vulkan compute workloads, it leads by margins of 513.8% and 494.3%, respectively. For any task that stresses raw shader throughput, memory bandwidth, or API-level compute, the NVIDIA card is the clear choice. Its 43.94 TFLOPS FP32 performance, 896.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 16 GB frame buffer make it suitable for large datasets, high-resolution textures, and compute-heavy rendering. The 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores also enable ray tracing and AI-accelerated features that the Radeon Pro 575 cannot access at all, since it has no such hardware listed.

The Radeon Pro 575 has no recorded benchmark wins against the RTX 5070 Ti. Its strengths are contextual rather than absolute. As an end-of-life MXM module with a 150 W TDP and no power connectors, it fits into portable and compact systems where the RTX 5070 Ti's dual-slot footprint and 16-pin connector would not work. Its 4 GB GDDR5 memory is sufficient for legacy workloads and older API versions (DirectX 12_0, Vulkan 1.3). For users constrained by physical space, power delivery, or a specific Mac-oriented design (the generation field lists "Radeon Pro Mac (500 Series)"), the Pro 575 remains a functional option, but it cannot compete on performance.

The database's nearest-rival data reinforces this split. The Radeon Pro 575's closest competitors are other workstation and mobile parts like the RTX A500 Mobile and Radeon Pro 575X, all within 1.9% of its average score. The RTX 5070 Ti's rivals are high-end desktop cards like the RX 6900 XT and RX 6800 XT, with deltas ranging from -2% to +3.1%. This positions the two cards in different market segments entirely, even though they share a benchmark database entry point.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti outperforms the AMD Radeon Pro 575 in every shared benchmark, with deltas exceeding 494%. The RTX 5070 Ti is the correct choice for anyone needing maximum compute throughput, modern API support, ray tracing capability, and large memory capacity. Its 16 GB GDDR7 frame buffer and 896.0 GB/s bandwidth are essential for current-generation workloads. The Radeon Pro 575, with 4 GB GDDR5 and 217.0 GB/s, is a legacy part suited for specific portable systems and older software stacks.

The architectural gap is not close. Five-nanometer Blackwell 2.0 versus 14 nm GCN 4.0, 45,600 million transistors versus 5,700 million, 43.94 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS. The RTX 5070 Ti also brings dedicated RT and tensor cores, which the Pro 575 lacks entirely. For a user starting a new build or upgrading from an older system, the RTX 5070 Ti is the only rational pick based on performance data. For a user maintaining a 2017-era Mac or compact workstation where an MXM module is required, the Radeon Pro 575 remains a viable, if limited, option. The verdict from the recorded measurements is clear: the RTX 5070 Ti wins on every measurable axis, and the Pro 575's only advantages are form factor and power draw, neither of which appears in benchmark scores.

FAQ

Q: How much faster is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti in OpenCL compute?

A: It scores 212,363 versus 34,596 for the AMD Radeon Pro 575, a 513.8% advantage.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 575 win any benchmark against the RTX 5070 Ti?

A: No. In the two shared tests, Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 Ti wins both, with the win count at 2 for NVIDIA and 0 for AMD.

Q: What memory configurations do the two cards use?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 575 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the Radeon Pro 575 is competitive?

A: The recorded data shows no such test. Its average score of 39,555 places it near rivals like the RTX A500 Mobile (39,568, 0% delta) and Radeon Pro 575X (39,116, 1.1% delta), but against the RTX 5070 Ti it trails by hundreds of percent.

Q: What is the transistor count difference between the two GPUs?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, while the Radeon Pro 575 has 5,700 million on a 232 mm² die.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 575 support ray tracing or tensor operations?

A: The database lists no RT cores or tensor cores for the Radeon Pro 575. The RTX 5070 Ti has 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores.

Specification Differences

| Field | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | AMD Radeon Pro 575 |

|-------|---------------------------|--------------------|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | GCN 4.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | 5,700 million |

| Die Size | 378 mm² | 232 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 120.6M / mm² | 24.6M / mm² |

| Shading Units | 8,960 | 2,048 |

| TMUs | 280 | 128 |

| ROPs | 96 | 32 |

| RT Cores | 70 | None |

| Tensor Cores | 280 | None |

| FP32 Compute | 43.94 TFLOPS | 4.489 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Compute | 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.489 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Pixel Rate | 235.4 GPixel/s | 35.07 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 686.6 GTexel/s | 140.3 GTexel/s |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus | 256 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | 217.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) | 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective) |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | Not listed |

| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz | Not listed |

| TDP | 300 W | 150 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | MXM Module |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| OpenGL Support | 4.6 | 4.6 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-02-19 | 2017-06-04 |

| Suggested PSU | 700 W | Not listed |

| Dimensions | 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm | Not listed |