AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 and AMD Radeon Pro 575 are separated by nearly a decade of GPU architecture, and the benchmark data reflects that gap decisively. The RTX 5070 dominates every shared test, but the Radeon Pro 575 holds an 82nd percentile ranking among all GPUs, identical to the RTX 5070, which shows that older professional hardware can still hold its own in certain legacy workloads. For anyone building or upgrading today, the RTX 5070 is the clear choice for modern DirectX 12 and Vulkan applications, while the Radeon Pro 575 is only relevant for users locked into older Mac Pro systems or MXM-based portable workstations where its 150W power draw and slotless design are mandatory constraints.

The Verdict

The data makes the hierarchy unambiguous: the RTX 5070 is in a different performance class entirely. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the RTX 5070 scores 172,660 against the Radeon Pro 575’s 34,596, a 399.1% advantage. The Vulkan gap is similarly lopsided at 372.4%, with scores of 178,923 versus 37,878. If you are running modern 3D workloads, the RTX 5070 is the only rational purchase. Its average benchmark score of 40,377 also sits slightly above the Radeon Pro 575’s 39,555, though both land in the same 82nd percentile overall, meaning the older card is not an embarrassment in general compute tasks. The Radeon Pro 575 makes sense only in narrow cases: it is an end-of-life MXM module with no power connector, designed for portable or all-in-one systems where the RTX 5070’s dual-slot, 250W, 16-pin power requirement physically cannot fit. If you need a drop-in replacement for a 2017-era Mac Pro or a proprietary mobile chassis, the Radeon Pro 575 is what the form factor dictates; if you have any flexibility in system design, the RTX 5070 wins on every measurable axis.

Architecture Differences

The architectural chasm between these two GPUs is vast. The RTX 5070 uses NVIDIA’s Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5nm TSMC process, packing 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The Radeon Pro 575 uses AMD’s GCN 4.0 architecture on a 14nm GlobalFoundries process, with 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, yielding just 24.6M transistors per mm². That density difference — nearly fivefold — explains why the RTX 5070 achieves 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 performance while the Radeon Pro 575 manages only 4.489 TFLOPS. The RTX 5070 features 6,144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, alongside 48 dedicated ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 575 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no dedicated ray tracing or tensor cores at all. The RTX 5070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Radeon Pro 575 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both cards support OpenGL 4.6, but the feature-level gap in DirectX and the absence of hardware ray tracing on the AMD card are decisive for modern game engines and DXR-based renderers.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

Only two benchmarks appear in both cards’ result sets, and the RTX 5070 wins both by enormous margins. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 scores 172,660 against the Radeon Pro 575’s 34,596, a delta of 399.1%. That is not a marginal improvement; it is a 4x throughput increase, driven by the newer architecture’s higher shading unit count and vastly superior memory bandwidth. In Geekbench Vulkan, the RTX 5070 scores 178,923 versus 37,878, a 372.4% advantage. Vulkan is a low-level API that scales well with raw hardware resources, and the RTX 5070’s 48 ray tracing cores and 192 tensor cores give it additional headroom that the Radeon Pro 575 simply lacks. Notably, the Radeon Pro 575 has a Geekbench Metal score of 46,192, a test the RTX 5070 does not appear in, so Apple-centric workflows may still see acceptable performance from the older card. However, for any cross-platform OpenCL or Vulkan workload, the RTX 5070 is the overwhelming winner.

Specification Differences

The specification sheet shows a complete generational reset. The RTX 5070 uses 12GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Radeon Pro 575 uses 4GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth. Despite the narrower bus, the RTX 5070’s faster memory type and higher effective clock (1750 MHz versus 1695 MHz) produce over three times the bandwidth. The RTX 5070’s boost clock is 2512 MHz, while the Radeon Pro 575’s base and boost clocks are not listed in the data. The RTX 5070 has a 250W TDP and requires a 600W power supply, using a single 16-pin connector; the Radeon Pro 575 draws 150W with no power connector, powered entirely through the MXM slot. The RTX 5070 is a dual-slot card measuring 245mm in length, 115mm in height, and 40mm in width, while the Radeon Pro 575 is an MXM module with no listed dimensions, making it suitable for laptops and compact chassis. The RTX 5070 uses PCIe 5.0 x16, whereas the Radeon Pro 575 is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs also differ: the RTX 5070 has 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b, while the Radeon Pro 575’s outputs are portable-device dependent. The RTX 5070 is an active production part released in March 2025, while the Radeon Pro 575 is end-of-life, released in June 2017.

FAQ

Q: Which card is faster in Geekbench OpenCL?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 scores 172,660, which is 399.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 575’s 34,596.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 575 support ray tracing?

A: No. The data lists no ray tracing cores for the AMD card, whereas the RTX 5070 has 48 dedicated RT cores.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference?

A: The RTX 5070 provides 672.0 GB/s from 12GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus, while the Radeon Pro 575 provides 217.0 GB/s from 4GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: Are these cards in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both score in the 82nd percentile among all GPUs, despite the RTX 5070’s much higher average benchmark score of 40,377 versus 39,555.

Q: Can the Radeon Pro 575 be used in a standard desktop PCIe slot?

A: It uses an MXM module form factor and a PCIe 3.0 x16 interface, but its power draw is 150W with no external power connector, meaning it is designed for proprietary mobile or all-in-one systems, not standard desktop towers.

Q: What is the DirectX feature level difference?

A: The RTX 5070 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Radeon Pro 575 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0). This means the NVIDIA card can run the latest DXR ray tracing and mesh shader features.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 wins everywhere that modern API support and raw compute matter. Its 399.1% OpenCL advantage over the Radeon Pro 575 makes it the default choice for GPU compute, machine learning inference, and 3D rendering in Blender, Maya, or Unreal Engine. The 372.4% Vulkan lead solidifies its position for gaming, especially with Vulkan-based titles that leverage the 48 RT cores and 192 tensor cores for ray-traced lighting and DLSS-style upscaling. The RTX 5070’s 672 GB/s bandwidth and 30.87 TFLOPS FP32 throughput also make it superior for high-resolution texture streaming and large dataset processing, where the Radeon Pro 575’s 217 GB/s and 4.489 TFLOPS would bottleneck.

The Radeon Pro 575’s only wins are contextual, not performance-based. Its 150W TDP and MXM form factor with no power connector mean it can be installed in systems where the RTX 5070’s 250W draw and 16-pin connector are physically impossible. Its Geekbench Metal score of 46,192, which the RTX 5070 has no equivalent test for, suggests it retains some utility in Apple’s Metal API ecosystem, particularly in older Mac Pro towers where the 2017 release date aligns with the system’s architecture. For any workload that can run on either card, the RTX 5070 wins outright. For legacy Mac or proprietary mobile systems, the Radeon Pro 575 is the only option that fits. The data does not support any other conclusion.