AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark data between the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and the AMD Radeon Pro 575 is not close. Across the two shared tests, the NVIDIA card wins decisively in both, with a perfect 2-0 record. The GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers 176,953 in Geekbench OpenCL against the Radeon Pro 575's 34,596, a delta of 411.5%. In Geekbench Vulkan, the gap widens slightly: 213,808 versus 37,878, a 464.5% advantage. These are not marginal differences; they represent a generational chasm in raw compute throughput.

The magnitude of these wins matters more than the raw scores. A 411.5% lead in OpenCL means the RTX 4070 Ti is roughly five times faster in that workload. In Vulkan, the 464.5% delta pushes it past five-and-a-half times faster. For context, the RTX 4070 Ti's average benchmark score of 44,795 places it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs, while the Radeon Pro 575's 39,555 average sits at the 82nd percentile. Despite the similar percentile ranking, the actual scores tell a different story—the RTX 4070 Ti's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile at -0.8% and the Intel Arc A730M at -1.7%, while the Radeon Pro 575 competes with the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile at 0% and the AMD Radeon Pro 580 at -1.9%. The Radeon Pro 575 is punching in a much lower weight class.

One important caveat: the Radeon Pro 575 has a benchmark score in Geekbench Metal (46,192) that has no counterpart in the RTX 4070 Ti's test suite. This means the NVIDIA card's wins are confined to OpenCL and Vulkan, and there is no direct cross-platform comparison for Apple's Metal API. Still, within the shared test set, the RTX 4070 Ti's dominance is absolute and unambiguous.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different eras and design philosophies. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses the AD104 chip built on Ada Lovelace architecture, manufactured by TSMC on a 5 nm process. It packs 35,800 million transistors into a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per square millimeter. The AMD Radeon Pro 575 uses the Ellesmere chip with GCN 4.0 architecture, built by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process. It contains 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, with a density of just 24.6 million per square millimeter. The RTX 4070 Ti has over six times more transistors and nearly five times the density.

Memory configurations diverge sharply. The RTX 4070 Ti ships with 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, delivering 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 575 offers 4 GB of GDDR5 on a wider 256-bit bus, but only reaches 217.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card has more than double the bandwidth despite a narrower bus, thanks to faster memory clocks (1313 MHz base, 21 Gbps effective versus 1695 MHz, 6.8 Gbps effective). The Radeon Pro 575's wider bus is a legacy feature that cannot compensate for the older memory technology.

Compute resources are similarly lopsided. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7,680 shading units, 240 texture mapping units, and 80 raster operation pipelines. The Radeon Pro 575 has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The NVIDIA card also includes 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores; the AMD card has none of either. Pixel rate is 208.8 GPixel/s versus 35.07 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 626.4 GTexel/s versus 140.3 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 40.09 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS, a roughly nine-fold difference. Both cards support FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32.

Power and physical specifications also differ. The RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 W, requires a 600 W suggested PSU, uses a single 16-pin connector, and occupies a dual-slot form factor measuring 285 mm in length. The Radeon Pro 575 draws 150 W, uses no external power connectors, and comes as an MXM module—a mobile form factor with no fixed dimensions. The NVIDIA card uses PCIe 4.0 x16, while the AMD card uses PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs are 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a for NVIDIA, versus "Portable Device Dependent" for AMD.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti has an average benchmark score of 44,795, compared to the AMD Radeon Pro 575's 39,555.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti faster in every shared benchmark?

A: Yes. The RTX 4070 Ti wins both Geekbench OpenCL (176,953 vs 34,596, +411.5%) and Geekbench Vulkan (213,808 vs 37,878, +464.5%). The Radeon Pro 575 has no wins in the head-to-head tests.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 575 have any unique benchmark coverage?

A: Yes. The Radeon Pro 575 has a Geekbench Metal score of 46,192, which has no corresponding test on the RTX 4070 Ti's benchmark list.

Q: What are the transistor counts of these two GPUs?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, while the Radeon Pro 575 has 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die.

Q: Which GPU has more memory bandwidth?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth from 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus. The Radeon Pro 575 has 217.0 GB/s from 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus.

Q: How do the ray tracing capabilities compare?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti includes 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 575 has no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification. Process node: 5 nm (TSMC) versus 14 nm (GlobalFoundries). Transistor count: 35,800 million versus 5,700 million. Die size: 294 mm² versus 232 mm². Transistor density: 121.8M per mm² versus 24.6M per mm². Memory: 12 GB GDDR6X versus 4 GB GDDR5. Memory bus: 192-bit versus 256-bit. Bandwidth: 504.2 GB/s versus 217.0 GB/s. Shading units: 7,680 versus 2,048. TMUs: 240 versus 128. ROPs: 80 versus 32. RT cores: 60 versus none. Tensor cores: 240 versus none. Pixel rate: 208.8 GPixel/s versus 35.07 GPixel/s. Texture rate: 626.4 GTexel/s versus 140.3 GTexel/s. FP32: 40.09 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS. FP16: 40.09 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS. TDP: 285 W versus 150 W. Slot width: dual-slot versus MXM module. Power connectors: 1x 16-pin versus none. Bus interface: PCIe 4.0 x16 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs: 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a versus portable-device-dependent. DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus 12 (12_0). Vulkan support: 1.4 versus 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The RTX 4070 Ti has a launch MSRP of 799 USD; the Radeon Pro 575 has no listed launch MSRP.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti wins in every shared workload. Its 411.5% OpenCL advantage and 464.5% Vulkan advantage make it the clear choice for any compute-heavy application that uses either API. The 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, coupled with 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores, positions it for modern workloads including ray-traced rendering and AI-accelerated tasks. The 12 GB GDDR6X memory with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth supports larger datasets and higher resolutions. Its 84th percentile ranking among all GPUs, with nearest rivals like the RTX 5090 Mobile and Intel Arc A730M, confirms it sits near the top of the performance distribution.

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 has no benchmark wins against the RTX 4070 Ti. Its strengths are relative to its own class: it sits at the 82nd percentile, with nearest rivals including the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100. Its 150 W TDP and MXM form factor make it suitable for portable or space-constrained systems, and its lack of external power connectors simplifies installation. The Geekbench Metal score of 46,192 indicates it has some utility in Apple-centric environments, though there is no direct comparison available for the RTX 4070 Ti in that API. The 256-bit memory bus is wider than the NVIDIA card's 192-bit bus, though the older GDDR5 memory limits its practical benefit.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is the superior GPU by every shared metric. A 411.5% lead in OpenCL and a 464.5% lead in Vulkan are not incremental improvements; they are generational leaps. The RTX 4070 Ti offers roughly nine times the FP32 throughput, more than double the memory bandwidth, and features like ray tracing and tensor cores that the Radeon Pro 575 simply does not have. Its 84th percentile ranking versus the Radeon Pro 575's 82nd percentile understates the gap, because the percentile comparison is relative to different pools of competing GPUs—the RTX 4070 Ti competes with the RTX 5090 Mobile and Arc A730M, while the Radeon Pro 575 competes with the RTX A500 Mobile and Radeon Pro WX 7100.

Anyone choosing between these two for a performance-critical role should pick the RTX 4070 Ti without hesitation. It is faster, more feature-rich, and more future-proof. The Radeon Pro 575's only arguments are its lower 150 W TDP and its MXM form factor, which target compact or mobile systems. If the workload requires Metal API support and the system is Apple-based, the Radeon Pro 575 does have a unique benchmark score, but that is a niche scenario. For general compute, rendering, or gaming, the RTX 4070 Ti is the only rational choice. The verdict is not a close call—it is a statistical blowout.