AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A represent two distinct approaches to mobile graphics, separated by nearly five years of architecture evolution. The data shows a near-perfect split: the NVIDIA card wins the OpenCL compute test by a substantial margin, while the AMD card edges out a narrow victory in Vulkan. Their average benchmark scores are remarkably close—39,555 for the AMD versus 38,691 for the NVIDIA—placing them within 2.2% of each other overall, yet their underlying designs could hardly be more different.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 leads with an average benchmark score of 39,555, compared to the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A’s 38,691. This puts the AMD part at the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA sits just one point lower at the 81st percentile.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in the Geekbench OpenCL test?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A is the clear winner in OpenCL, scoring 39,780 against the AMD Radeon Pro 575’s 34,596. That represents a 13% delta in NVIDIA’s favor, making it the largest performance gap between the two cards in any shared benchmark.

Q: Which GPU wins in the Vulkan benchmark?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 takes the Vulkan test with a score of 37,878, narrowly beating the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A’s 37,601. The margin is just 0.7%, indicating near-identical performance in this API.

Q: What are the memory specifications of each card?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 features 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 217.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A has 2 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 64-bit bus, providing 96.00 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How do the thermal design power (TDP) ratings differ?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is rated at 150 W and uses an MXM Module slot width, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A is rated at a much lower 25 W and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) form factor. This six-fold difference in power draw is a defining characteristic of their designs.

Q: Which GPU supports newer graphics APIs?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the AMD Radeon Pro 575 supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both cards support OpenGL 4.6.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is built on the Ellesmere chip using GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. This older design packs 5,700 million transistors onto a 232 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.6 million per mm². In contrast, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A uses the GA107SB chip with Ampere architecture, manufactured by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It contains 8,700 million transistors on a slightly smaller 200 mm² die, achieving a much higher transistor density of 43.5 million per mm².

The memory subsystems could not be more different. AMD opts for 4 GB of GDDR5 across a 256-bit bus, producing 217.0 GB/s of bandwidth—more than double the NVIDIA card’s throughput. NVIDIA counters with 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, limited to 96.00 GB/s. However, the NVIDIA card features 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores, hardware that the AMD card lacks entirely, reflecting the Ampere architecture’s focus on ray tracing and AI acceleration.

Clock behavior also diverges sharply. The AMD card lists only its memory clock at 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective), with no base or boost figures provided. The NVIDIA card specifies a base clock of 832 MHz and a boost clock of 1155 MHz, with memory at 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective). The NVIDIA card also uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface, while the AMD card is limited to PCIe 3.0 x16.

Raw compute resources show a mix of similarities and differences. Both cards feature 2,048 shading units and 32 ROPs, but AMD has 128 TMUs versus NVIDIA’s 64. The AMD card achieves a texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s, nearly double the NVIDIA’s 73.92 GTexel/s. Pixel rates are close, with AMD at 35.07 GPixel/s and NVIDIA at 36.96 GPixel/s. In FP32 throughput, NVIDIA slightly edges ahead with 4.731 TFLOPS compared to AMD’s 4.489 TFLOPS, and both deliver identical FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear choice based on workload priorities. For compute-heavy tasks using OpenCL, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A is the definitive winner, delivering a 13% performance advantage over the AMD Radeon Pro 575. That margin is significant in real-world rendering or GPU-compute scenarios. The NVIDIA card also brings modern features like RT cores and tensor cores, plus support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, making it the more future-proof option for applications that leverage these APIs.

However, the AMD Radeon Pro 575 holds its own in several critical areas. Its 4 GB memory capacity and 217.0 GB/s bandwidth—more than double the NVIDIA’s bandwidth—make it superior for memory-intensive workloads like high-resolution texture loading or large data sets. The AMD card also wins the Vulkan benchmark, albeit by a razor-thin 0.7% margin. Its 128 TMUs and higher texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s indicate stronger fill-rate performance in certain rendering pipelines.

For users prioritizing power efficiency, the NVIDIA card is the obvious pick: 25 W versus 150 W is a six-fold difference. The NVIDIA IGP form factor suits thin-and-light laptops, while the AMD MXM Module targets larger, more power-hungry mobile workstations. The AMD card’s end-of-life status and 2017 release date, versus NVIDIA’s 2021 release, further suggest that NVIDIA represents the newer technology generation. In short: choose NVIDIA for compute performance, efficiency, and modern API support; choose AMD for memory bandwidth and Vulkan parity.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A differ across nearly every major specification category. The manufacturing process differs significantly: AMD uses 14 nm at GlobalFoundries, while NVIDIA uses 8 nm at Samsung. Transistor counts are 5,700 million versus 8,700 million, and die sizes are 232 mm² versus 200 mm², resulting in transistor densities of 24.6M/mm² and 43.5M/mm² respectively.

Memory configurations are starkly different: AMD has 4 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth, while NVIDIA has 2 GB GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s bandwidth. Clock speeds also differ, with NVIDIA specifying base and boost clocks of 832 MHz and 1155 MHz, while AMD does not list base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective) versus NVIDIA’s 1500 MHz (12 Gbps effective).

Compute unit counts show AMD’s advantage in texture units (128 versus 64) and its disadvantage in absence of RT cores (0 versus 16) and tensor cores (0 versus 64). Both have 2,048 shading units and 32 ROPs. Texture rate is 140.3 GTexel/s for AMD versus 73.92 GTexel/s for NVIDIA, while pixel rates are 35.07 GPixel/s versus 36.96 GPixel/s. FP32 and FP16 performance are 4.489 TFLOPS versus 4.731 TFLOPS.

Power and form factor differ dramatically: AMD is rated at 150 W with an MXM Module slot width, NVIDIA at 25 W with an IGP slot width. Both use no power connectors. The bus interface is PCIe 3.0 x16 for AMD versus PCIe 4.0 x8 for NVIDIA. API support differs in DirectX (12_0 versus 12 Ultimate/12_2) and Vulkan (1.3 versus 1.4), with OpenGL 4.6 shared. Release dates are June 2017 for AMD and December 2021 for NVIDIA, with both marked as end-of-life.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The shared benchmark suite reveals a split decision. In Geekbench OpenCL, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A dominates with a score of 39,780 against the AMD Radeon Pro 575’s 34,596. That 13% delta is the single largest performance gap between these two cards, and it aligns with NVIDIA’s architectural advantages in compute-heavy workloads. The NVIDIA card’s higher FP32 throughput of 4.731 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS likely contributes to this margin, along with its modern Ampere design.

The Vulkan benchmark tells a different story, with the AMD Radeon Pro 575 winning by a narrow 0.7% margin: 37,878 versus 37,601. This near-tie suggests that in graphics-oriented tasks using Vulkan, the two cards are effectively interchangeable. AMD’s superior memory bandwidth (217.0 GB/s versus 96.00 GB/s) and doubled texture rate (140.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s) may help offset NVIDIA’s raw compute edge in this test.

The overall average scores reflect this balance: AMD’s average benchmark score of 39,555 versus NVIDIA’s 38,691, a difference of only 864 points. The AMD card’s nearest rival, the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile, scores 39,568 with a 0% delta, confirming that the Radeon Pro 575 sits in a tight competitive cluster. The NVIDIA MX570 A’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon Pro 580X at 38,706 with a 0% delta, with the GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile (38,349) and GeForce MX570 (38,299) close behind. Both cards are clearly positioned in the same performance tier, with the head-to-head results showing one decisive win each.