AMD Radeon Pro 575 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 and NVIDIA GeForce MX570 are both end-of-life mobile graphics solutions, but they target fundamentally different use cases. Based on the available benchmark data, the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 holds a clear performance advantage in the single overlapping test, while the AMD card counters with a much larger memory bus and bandwidth. The data shows that the MX570 is the faster GPU in raw compute, but the Pro 575's specifications suggest it was designed for different workloads where memory capacity and throughput matter more than peak FP32 output.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 wins the only directly comparable benchmark, the Geekbench OpenCL test, scoring 38,299 against the Radeon Pro 575's 34,596. That is a 9.7% deficit for the AMD part. The MX570 also posts a higher average benchmark score of 38,299 versus 39,555 for the Pro 575, though this average is skewed because the AMD card has three benchmark entries while the NVIDIA card has only one. The MX570 edges out the Pro 575 in raw compute throughput as well, with 4.731 TFLOPS FP32 versus 4.489 TFLOPS, a difference of roughly 5.4%.

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 wins on memory architecture decisively. It offers 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 217.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The MX570 has only 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus, yielding 96.00 GB/s — less than half the bandwidth. For workloads that are memory-bound — such as large textures, high-resolution compute, or multi-app environments — the Pro 575's advantage is substantial. The AMD card also has double the texture mapping units (128 TMUs versus 64) and a higher texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s, meaning it can feed shaders with texture data nearly twice as fast.

In practical terms, the MX570 is the winner for compute-heavy tasks that fit within its 2 GB frame buffer, while the Pro 575 is better suited for memory-intensive workloads. The AMD card's 82nd percentile ranking versus the MX570's 81st percentile suggests they are closely matched overall, but the nature of the workload will determine the actual winner.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and foundries. The AMD Radeon Pro 575 uses the Ellesmere chip built on GCN 4.0 architecture, fabricated by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process. It contains 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 24.6 million per square millimeter. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 uses the GA107S chip based on Ampere architecture, built by Samsung on an 8 nm process. It packs 8,700 million transistors into a 200 mm² die, achieving a much higher transistor density of 43.5 million per square millimeter.

The MX570 has a newer feature set. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Pro 575 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The Ampere chip includes 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores, neither of which exist on the GCN-based Pro 575. This means the MX570 can handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, while the Pro 575 cannot.

The memory subsystems differ fundamentally. The Pro 575 uses 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit interface, while the MX570 uses 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit interface. The effective memory clock is higher on the MX570 (12 Gbps effective versus 6.8 Gbps), but the narrow bus limits its bandwidth to 96.00 GB/s. The Pro 575's memory clock is listed at 1695 MHz with 6.8 Gbps effective.

Power and form factor also diverge sharply. The Pro 575 has a 150 W TDP and uses an MXM module slot, while the MX570 has a 15 W TDP and is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) solution. Neither requires external power connectors. The bus interface differs as well: the Pro 575 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The MX570's newer interface offers more bandwidth per lane, but the Pro 575 has more lanes available.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct comparison available is the Geekbench OpenCL test. The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 scores 38,299, while the AMD Radeon Pro 575 scores 34,596. That gives the MX570 a 9.7% lead, which is a meaningful margin in compute workloads. The MX570's nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 Mobile, scores 38,349 — just 0.1% higher — which puts the MX570 in strong company despite its low power envelope.

The Pro 575's nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon Pro 575X at 39,116 (1.1% higher), the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 at 40,063 (1.3% higher than the Pro 575), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580 at 40,318 (1.9% higher). The Pro 575 sits just below these cards, with an average score of 39,555 across its three benchmarks. Its Geekbench Metal score is 46,192, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 37,878.

The MX570's average benchmark score of 38,299 comes solely from its OpenCL result. Its nearest rivals include the GeForce RTX 4080 Mobile at 38,135 (0.4% lower), the GeForce MX570 A at 38,691 (1% higher), and the AMD Radeon Pro 580X at 38,706 (1.1% higher). The MX570 is competitive with much larger discrete GPUs despite its 15 W TDP, which confirms the efficiency of the Ampere architecture.

Looking at compute-related specifications, the MX570's FP32 output of 4.731 TFLOPS is higher than the Pro 575's 4.489 TFLOPS, and its FP16 output is identical at 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 4.489 TFLOPS (1:1). The pixel rates are nearly identical: 36.96 GPixel/s for the MX570 versus 35.07 GPixel/s for the Pro 575. The texture rate is where the AMD card pulls ahead significantly, at 140.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s, due to its 128 TMUs versus 64.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in raw compute performance?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 is faster in raw compute. It scores 38,299 in Geekbench OpenCL versus 34,596 for the AMD Radeon Pro 575, a 9.7% advantage. Its FP32 throughput is also higher at 4.731 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon Pro 575 have any significant advantages?

A: Yes, the Pro 575 has a much larger memory subsystem: 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth, compared to 2 GB of GDDR6 on a 64-bit bus with 96.00 GB/s. It also has double the TMUs (128 versus 64) and a higher texture rate of 140.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s.

Q: Can the MX570 handle ray tracing?

A: Yes, the MX570 includes 16 ray tracing cores and 64 tensor cores, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The AMD Radeon Pro 575 has no ray tracing or tensor cores and supports only DirectX 12 (12_0).

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 has a 150 W TDP and uses an MXM module slot, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 has a 15 W TDP and is an IGP. Neither requires external power connectors.

Q: Which GPU has a better overall benchmark percentile?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 ranks in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 ranks in the 81st percentile. Their average benchmark scores are 39,555 and 38,299, respectively, but the Pro 575 has three benchmark entries versus one for the MX570.

Q: What interface does each GPU use to connect to the system?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the NVIDIA GeForce MX570 uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

The Verdict

The NVIDIA GeForce MX570 is the better choice for compute performance. It wins the only head-to-head benchmark by 9.7%, has higher FP32 throughput (4.731 TFLOPS versus 4.489 TFLOPS), and adds modern features like ray tracing cores and tensor cores. Its 15 W TDP makes it far more suitable for thin-and-light laptops where power efficiency is critical. The data shows that despite its low power draw, the MX570 competes with much larger GPUs, sitting within 0.1% of the RTX 5080 Mobile and 0.4% above the RTX 4080 Mobile in average score.

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is the better choice for memory-bound workloads. Its 4 GB frame buffer and 217.0 GB/s bandwidth are more than double the MX570's 2 GB and 96.00 GB/s. The 256-bit memory bus and higher texture rate (140.3 GTexel/s versus 73.92 GTexel/s) make it better suited for applications that stream large textures or process large datasets. However, its 150 W TDP and MXM form factor limit its deployment to larger, less power-sensitive devices.

For most users, the MX570's combination of higher compute performance, lower power consumption, and modern architecture makes it the more compelling option. The Pro 575 only makes sense if the workload explicitly requires more memory capacity or memory bandwidth than the MX570 can provide. The benchmark data is unambiguous: in the test they share, the MX570 wins by a clear margin, and its architectural advantages in ray tracing and tensor operations give it a feature set the older GCN part cannot match.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | NVIDIA GeForce MX570 |

|----------------|-------------------|----------------------|

| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Ampere |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 8 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | Samsung |

| Transistors | 5,700 million | 8,700 million |

| Die Size | 232 mm² | 200 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 24.6M / mm² | 43.5M / mm² |

| Base Clock | None listed | 832 MHz |

| Boost Clock | None listed | 1155 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1695 MHz / 6.8 Gbps effective | 1500 MHz / 12 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 2 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | 64 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 217.0 GB/s | 96.00 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 2048 |

| TMUs | 128 | 64 |

| ROPs | 32 | 32 |

| RT Cores | None | 16 |

| Tensor Cores | None | 64 |

| Pixel Rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | 36.96 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 73.92 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.489 TFLOPS | 4.731 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 4.489 TFLOPS (1:1) | 4.731 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | MXM Module | IGP |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.3 | 1.4 |

| Release Date | 2017-06-04 | 2021-12-16 |