AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and AMD Radeon Pro 570 sit at opposite ends of the GPU timeline and performance spectrum. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an active-generation Blackwell part aimed at high-end laptops, while the Radeon Pro 570 is an end-of-life GCN 4.0 product from 2017 designed for Macs. Benchmark data shows the NVIDIA part dominates every shared test, but the AMD card holds its own in its niche. This analysis breaks down the architecture, benchmark deltas, and practical use cases from the data.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile posts an average benchmark score of 35435, while the AMD Radeon Pro 570 scores 33207. The NVIDIA part sits at the 80th percentile of all GPUs, compared to the AMD card's 78th percentile.

Q: How much faster is the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile in OpenCL?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143870 in Geekbench OpenCL versus the Radeon Pro 570's 27702. That is a 419.3% delta, making the NVIDIA GPU roughly five times faster in this compute test.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 570 support ray tracing?

A: No. The Radeon Pro 570 has no RT cores listed in its specifications. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 dedicated RT cores, which is a fundamental architectural difference.

Q: What memory configuration does each card use?

A: The NVIDIA card has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD card has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth. Despite a narrower bus, the NVIDIA part delivers over three times the memory bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher transistor density?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, built on a 5 nm TSMC process, has a density of 118.3M transistors per mm². The Radeon Pro 570, on GlobalFoundries' 14 nm node, has 24.6M transistors per mm² — roughly a 4.8x difference in density.

Q: Are both GPUs still in production?

A: No. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an "Active" production status, while the Radeon Pro 570 is marked "End-of-life". The AMD card was released on 2017-06-04, and the NVIDIA part on 2025-02-28.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is generational. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip under NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die. The Radeon Pro 570 uses the Ellesmere chip with GCN 4.0 architecture, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, containing 5,700 million transistors on a 232 mm² die. The NVIDIA chip achieves a transistor density of 118.3M / mm² versus 24.6M / mm² for AMD.

The shader configurations differ dramatically. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The Radeon Pro 570 has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. NVIDIA also includes 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, while the AMD card has neither RT nor tensor cores listed. This makes the NVIDIA part capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing and AI workloads, which the AMD card cannot do at the hardware level.

Memory architecture is another major divergence. The NVIDIA GPU uses 12 GB of GDDR7 with a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The AMD GPU uses 4 GB of GDDR5 with a 256-bit bus, providing 217.0 GB/s. Although the AMD card has a wider bus, the GDDR7 memory clocked at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) gives NVIDIA a 3.1x bandwidth advantage. The Radeon's memory runs at 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective).

The feature sets reflect their respective generations. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon Pro 570 supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. Both use PCIe x16, but NVIDIA uses PCIe 5.0 while AMD uses PCIe 3.0. The NVIDIA card has a 60 W TDP, while the AMD card draws 150 W — a notable efficiency difference given the performance gap.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The shared benchmark suite between these two GPUs is limited to two tests: Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan. In both, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins decisively.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143870 against the Radeon Pro 570's 27702. The delta is 419.3% in NVIDIA's favor. This is not a close contest; it reflects the massive difference in shading units (5888 vs 1792) and raw FP32 throughput (17.04 TFLOPS vs 3.960 TFLOPS).

In Geekbench Vulkan, the gap narrows slightly but remains overwhelming. The NVIDIA GPU scores 139213, while the AMD GPU scores 31974. The delta is 335.4%. Vulkan is a lower-level API that can sometimes reduce overhead for older architectures, but here it does not save the Radeon Pro 570 from a 4.4x deficit.

The NVIDIA card wins both head-to-head tests, totaling 2 wins to 0 for AMD. Its nearest rivals in the overall database — the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 (avg score 35520, delta -0.2%), AMD Radeon Pro Duo (35860, -1.2%), and NVIDIA T1000 (36289, -2.4%) — show it sits comfortably in the mid-range of high-end GPUs. The Radeon Pro 570's nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (33170, 0.1% delta), NVIDIA T550 Mobile (33161, 0.1%), and NVIDIA P104-100 (32982, 0.7%), placing it in a much lower performance tier.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the far more powerful GPU. It wins the only two directly comparable benchmarks by margins of 419.3% and 335.4%. Its average benchmark score of 35435 is 6.7% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 570's 33207. The NVIDIA part also has a higher percentile ranking (80th vs 78th), more memory (12 GB vs 4 GB), newer memory technology (GDDR7 vs GDDR5), and substantially higher compute throughput (17.04 TFLOPS vs 3.960 TFLOPS FP32).

However, the Radeon Pro 570 is not without context. It is an end-of-life product from 2017, built for Mac systems, and its 150 W TDP suggests it was designed for desktop-class performance in a mobile form factor. Its 78th percentile ranking means it still outperforms a majority of all GPUs in the database. For legacy Mac compatibility or specific OpenCL/Metal workloads, it may still have a role. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile, though, is the clear choice for any modern workload requiring raw performance, ray tracing, or AI acceleration.

Which GPU to pick depends entirely on your platform and needs. If you need maximum performance, modern API support, and hardware RT, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the only option. If you are constrained to a legacy Mac environment and need a working GPU with basic Vulkan and OpenCL support, the Radeon Pro 570 remains functional, but it will not compete with the NVIDIA part in any metric.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every specification field. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip on a 5 nm process with 31,100 million transistors and a 263 mm² die. The Radeon Pro 570 uses the Ellesmere chip on a 14 nm process with 5,700 million transistors and a 232 mm² die. Transistor density is 118.3M / mm² for NVIDIA versus 24.6M / mm² for AMD.

Clock speeds are notably different. The NVIDIA GPU has a base clock of 847 MHz and a boost of 1447 MHz. The AMD GPU runs at 1000 MHz base and 1105 MHz boost. Despite lower clocks, the NVIDIA part delivers far higher throughput due to its larger shader count and newer architecture.

Memory configurations diverge completely: 12 GB GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus (672.0 GB/s) versus 4 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus (217.0 GB/s). The NVIDIA card has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The AMD card has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no RT or tensor cores.

Rates and compute figures favor NVIDIA: pixel rate of 115.8 GPixel/s versus 35.36 GPixel/s, texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s versus 123.8 GTexel/s, and FP32 of 17.04 TFLOPS versus 3.960 TFLOPS. TDP is 60 W for NVIDIA and 150 W for AMD. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. API support differs: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus DirectX 12 (12_0), and Vulkan 1.4 versus 1.3. Production status is Active versus End-of-life.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every directly comparable benchmark category. It dominates OpenCL compute with a 419.3% advantage, making it the choice for GPU-accelerated rendering, scientific computing, and machine learning inference. Its Vulkan performance is 335.4% higher, which covers modern gaming and cross-platform graphics workloads. The 12 GB of GDDR7 memory with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth supports large textures and datasets, while the 46 RT cores enable hardware ray tracing that the AMD card cannot perform. The 184 tensor cores add AI acceleration capabilities, from DLSS-style features to neural network inference. With a 60 W TDP, it also delivers this performance at a fraction of the power draw.

The AMD Radeon Pro 570 has no benchmark wins in the shared test suite, but its data shows specific strengths. It supports Metal via a Geekbench Metal score of 39945, which is not a test the NVIDIA card has in its results — this indicates its design for Apple ecosystems. Its 217.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 256-bit bus is respectable for its era, and its 78th percentile ranking shows it remains relevant for basic 3D workloads. The 150 W TDP suggests it was configured for sustained desktop-like performance in a Mac Pro or high-end iMac, where power efficiency is less critical than consistent output. For users locked into legacy Mac software that relies on GCN-specific optimizations, this card remains a functional option, but it cannot match the NVIDIA GPU in any modern cross-platform benchmark.

The practical split is clear: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is for users who need maximum performance, modern features, and efficiency in a current laptop platform. The Radeon Pro 570 is for those maintaining older Mac systems where compatibility outweighs performance, accepting its 2017-era capabilities and end-of-life status.