AMD Radeon Pro 570 vs AMD Radeon Pro 575 Comparison

AMD Radeon Pro 575 and AMD Radeon Pro 570 are two professional graphics solutions from the same Ellesmere family, sharing the same 14 nm process, 5,700 million transistors, and 232 mm² die size. The data shows a clear performance hierarchy: the Pro 575 wins all three recorded benchmark tests, with an average benchmark score of 39,555 compared to the Pro 570's 33,207. This translates to a 19.1% overall advantage for the Pro 575, placing it in the 82nd percentile of all GPUs, while the Pro 570 sits in the 78th percentile. The following analysis breaks down where each card excels, the architectural differences, and the exact benchmark deltas.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon Pro 575 is the outright winner in every compute scenario recorded in the database. It takes all three head-to-head benchmark tests: Geekbench Metal, Geekbench OpenCL, and Geekbench Vulkan. There are no test categories where the Pro 570 comes out ahead. For workloads that rely on Metal, which is common in macOS professional applications, the Pro 575 delivers a 15.6% higher score. For OpenCL, a widely used cross-platform compute API, the lead expands to 24.9%. In Vulkan, the gap is 18.5%. The Pro 575 also holds a higher average benchmark score of 39,555, which is 19.1% above the Pro 570's 33,207.

The Pro 570, while not winning any tests, still positions itself competitively within its own performance tier. Its average score of 33,207 places it within 0.1% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (33,170) and the NVIDIA T550 Mobile (33,161), and 0.7% ahead of the NVIDIA P104-100 (32,982). The Pro 575, by contrast, matches the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568) within 0.0% and sits 1.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro 575X (39,116), while trailing the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 (40,063) by 1.3% and the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40,318) by 1.9%. The data indicates the Pro 575 is the better choice for any compute-heavy task, while the Pro 570 is a more modest option that still performs within a similar range as several mobile NVIDIA workstation cards.

Architecture Differences

Both cards are built on the GCN 4.0 architecture using the Ellesmere chip, fabricated by GlobalFoundries on a 14 nm process. They share the same transistor count of 5,700 million and a die size of 232 mm², resulting in an identical transistor density of 24.6M / mm². The memory subsystem is also identical: 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, delivering 217.0 GB/s of bandwidth at a memory clock of 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective). Both support DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The slot width differs, with the Pro 575 using an MXM Module form factor, while the Pro 570 is listed as an IGP (integrated graphics processor). Neither card uses power connectors, and both have a TDP of 150 W.

The core configuration is where the two diverge. The Pro 575 has 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 32 raster operation units (ROPs). The Pro 570 has fewer resources: 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and the same 32 ROPs. This difference in execution resources directly impacts throughput. The Pro 575 also has a higher recorded clock specification for memory at 1695 MHz, while the Pro 570 lists a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 1105 MHz. The Pro 575 does not list base or boost clocks in the database, but its higher shading unit count and TMU count explain its performance advantage. Pixel rate is nearly identical, with the Pro 575 at 35.07 GPixel/s and the Pro 570 at 35.36 GPixel/s, but texture rate and FP32 compute favor the Pro 575 substantially.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded head-to-head data shows a consistent win for the AMD Radeon Pro 575 across all three tests. In Geekbench Metal, the Pro 575 scores 46,192 against the Pro 570's 39,945, a delta of 15.6%. This is the smallest margin of the three tests, but still a decisive lead. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Pro 575 scores 34,596 against 27,702, a delta of 24.9%. This is the largest gap, indicating that the Pro 575's additional shading units and TMUs provide a significant advantage in OpenCL compute workloads. In Geekbench Vulkan, the Pro 575 scores 37,878 against 31,974, a delta of 18.5%.

The average benchmark score reinforces this pattern. The Pro 575's average of 39,555 is 19.1% higher than the Pro 570's 33,207. Relative to their nearest rivals, the Pro 575's average score is nearly identical to the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568, 0.0% delta) and 1.1% above the AMD Radeon Pro 575X (39,116). The Pro 570's average score is 0.1% above the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (33,170) and the NVIDIA T550 Mobile (33,161), and 0.7% above the NVIDIA P104-100 (32,982). The data shows that the Pro 575 operates in a higher performance class, roughly 19% faster on average than the Pro 570, and the gap is consistent across different compute APIs.

FAQ

Q: Which card has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon Pro 575 has an average benchmark score of 39,555, which is 19.1% higher than the AMD Radeon Pro 570's average of 33,207.

Q: What is the largest performance gap between the two cards?

A: The largest gap is in Geekbench OpenCL, where the Pro 575 scores 34,596 versus the Pro 570's 27,702, a 24.9% difference in favor of the Pro 575.

Q: Do both cards have the same memory configuration?

A: Yes, both have 4 GB of GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 217.0 GB/s bandwidth and a memory clock of 1695 MHz (6.8 Gbps effective).

Q: How does the Pro 575 compare to the Pro 570 in shading units?

A: The Pro 575 has 2,048 shading units, while the Pro 570 has 1,792 shading units. The Pro 575 also has 128 TMUs versus 112 TMUs on the Pro 570.

Q: What is the pixel rate difference?

A: The pixel rates are nearly identical: the Pro 575 is rated at 35.07 GPixel/s, and the Pro 570 is rated at 35.36 GPixel/s, with the Pro 570 having a marginal 0.8% higher pixel rate.

Q: Which card has a higher percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Pro 575 is in the 82nd percentile, while the Pro 570 is in the 78th percentile.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous: the AMD Radeon Pro 575 is the superior card for every recorded workload. It wins all three benchmark tests, with deltas ranging from 15.6% in Metal to 24.9% in OpenCL, and holds a 19.1% higher average benchmark score. The Pro 575's additional 256 shading units and 16 TMUs provide a tangible compute advantage, particularly in OpenCL where the gap is largest. For users who need maximum performance in Metal, OpenCL, or Vulkan applications, the Pro 575 is the clear choice. Its average score of 39,555 places it in the same class as the NVIDIA RTX A500 Mobile (39,568) and above the AMD Radeon Pro 575X (39,116), making it a strong contender in its segment.

The AMD Radeon Pro 570, while not winning any tests, still offers a functional level of performance. Its average score of 33,207 is competitive with several NVIDIA mobile workstation cards, including the GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile (33,170) and T550 Mobile (33,161), and it sits in the 78th percentile of all GPUs. However, the 24.9% gap in OpenCL and the 18.5% gap in Vulkan indicate that the Pro 570 is a cut below the Pro 575 for compute-intensive tasks. The Pro 570's slightly higher pixel rate (35.36 GPixel/s vs 35.07 GPixel/s) does not offset its lower texture rate (123.8 GTexel/s vs 140.3 GTexel/s) or FP32 throughput (3.960 TFLOPS vs 4.489 TFLOPS). The verdict is straightforward: choose the Pro 575 for all compute-heavy professional workloads, and consider the Pro 570 only if the workload is light and the lower performance tier is acceptable.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon Pro 575 | AMD Radeon Pro 570 |

| --- | --- | --- |

| Shading Units | 2,048 | 1,792 |

| TMUs | 128 | 112 |

| ROPs | 32 | 32 |

| Pixel Rate | 35.07 GPixel/s | 35.36 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 140.3 GTexel/s | 123.8 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 4.489 TFLOPS | 3.960 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 4.489 TFLOPS (1:1) | 3.960 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| Base Clock | Not listed | 1000 MHz |

| Boost Clock | Not listed | 1105 MHz |

| Slot Width | MXM Module | IGP |

| Geekbench Metal Score | 46,192 | 39,945 |

| Geekbench OpenCL Score | 34,596 | 27,702 |

| Geekbench Vulkan Score | 37,878 | 31,974 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 39,555 | 33,207 |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 82 | 78 |

The two cards share identical process node (14 nm), transistor count (5,700 million), die size (232 mm²), memory (4 GB GDDR5, 256-bit, 217.0 GB/s), TDP (150 W), and API support (DirectX 12_0, OpenGL 4.6, Vulkan 1.3). The Pro 575's advantage comes entirely from its larger execution resources and resulting higher throughput rates, while the Pro 570 has a marginally higher pixel rate and documented base/boost clocks.