AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT and the AMD Radeon Pro 560X represent two entirely different eras and market segments within AMD’s lineup, separated by over five years of architectural evolution. The database shows a decisive generational gap, with the RX 7600 XT delivering a massive 856.5% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL and a 187.6% lead in Geekbench Vulkan, yet the Pro 560X holds a unique place as a low-power, end-of-life mobile solution. The following analysis breaks down their architectural identities, benchmark results, and the practical implications of their recorded specifications.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT has an average benchmark score of 17083, placing it at the 60th percentile of all GPUs. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X scores 15082 on average, sitting at the 57th percentile, a difference of roughly 2,001 points.

Q: How does the Radeon RX 7600 XT compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070?

A: The RX 7600 XT’s average score of 17083 is 0.7% lower than the RTX 3070’s 17208, indicating a near-parity in overall recorded performance. Conversely, it holds a 0.3% edge over the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690 (17037) and a 0.9% lead over the NVIDIA Tesla M4 (16932).

Q: What is the most significant performance delta in the head-to-head results?

A: The largest gap is in Geekbench OpenCL, where the RX 7600 XT scores 92426 against the Pro 560X’s 9663, a staggering 856.5% difference. This reflects the massive computational throughput difference between the two architectures.

Q: Which GPU supports hardware ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT features 32 dedicated ray accelerators as part of its RDNA 3.0 architecture. The AMD Radeon Pro 560X, based on GCN 4.0, has no ray-tracing cores listed in the database.

Q: What are the memory capacity and type differences?

A: The RX 7600 XT comes with 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 memory, also on a 128-bit bus, but with a much lower 94.08 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel fill rate?

A: The RX 7600 XT achieves a pixel rate of 176.3 GPixel/s, which is over ten times higher than the Pro 560X’s 16.06 GPixel/s. This is driven by the RX 7600 XT’s 64 ROPs compared to the Pro 560X’s 16 ROPs.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are built on fundamentally different process nodes and microarchitectures, explaining the vast performance gulf. The RX 7600 XT uses the Navi 33 chip, fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,300 million transistors packed into a 204 mm² die. This results in a transistor density of 65.2 million per square millimeter. In contrast, the Pro 560X uses the Polaris 21 chip, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries, with only 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, yielding a density of 24.4 million per square millimeter. The RX 7600 XT’s node advantage alone explains a significant portion of its efficiency and performance headroom.

Architecturally, the RX 7600 XT deploys RDNA 3.0, codenamed Hotpink Bonefish, part of the Navi III (RX 7000) generation. It features 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 32 ray accelerators. Its compute power is rated at 22.57 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio). The Pro 560X, on the other hand, uses GCN 4.0, with 1,024 shading units, 64 TMUs, and only 16 ROPs, with no ray accelerators. Its FP32 and FP16 throughput is a modest 2.056 TFLOPS. The shading unit count is exactly double in the newer card, and the ROP count is quadrupled, which directly impacts rasterization and pixel output.

Clock speeds further widen the gap. The RX 7600 XT has a base clock of 1980 MHz, a game clock of 2470 MHz, and a boost clock of 2755 MHz. The Pro 560X’s base and boost clocks are not recorded in the database, though its memory clock is 1470 MHz (5.9 Gbps effective). The RX 7600 XT also supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Pro 560X is limited to PCIe 3.0 x8. API support differs as well: the RX 7600 XT lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the Pro 560X only reaches DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. Both cards support OpenGL 4.6.

Power and physical design are starkly different. The RX 7600 XT is a dual-slot card with a 190 W TDP, requiring a single 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W power supply. It measures 204 mm in length and 115 mm in height. The Pro 560X is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a 75 W TDP, no power connectors, and dimensions that are not listed. The production statuses reflect their lifecycles: the RX 7600 XT is active, released on 2024-01-23, while the Pro 560X is end-of-life, released on 2018-07-15.

The Verdict

The benchmark data is unequivocal for raw performance: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT is the superior choice for any computationally intensive workload. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 92426 dwarfs the Pro 560X’s 9663, and its Vulkan score of 48366 is nearly three times the older card’s 16819. The RX 7600 XT also sits at a higher percentile (60th) and has a higher average score (17083 vs 15082). For gamers, creators, or professionals running 3D applications, the RX 7600 XT is the only viable option in this comparison, offering modern features like ray tracing and a massive 16 GB memory buffer.

However, the Pro 560X serves a distinct purpose that the benchmarks do not capture. Its 75 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for portable, power-constrained systems, such as the Mac laptops it was designed for. It is an end-of-life product, so new purchases are unlikely, but its low power envelope and lack of external power connectors are its defining characteristics. The data shows it is not competitive in performance, but its existence in the database is a reminder that raw scores are not the sole metric for every use case. The RX 7600 XT wins decisively on performance, while the Pro 560X only offers a lower power draw and an integrated form factor.

Specification Differences

The table below highlights only the fields where the two GPUs differ according to the database. The RX 7600 XT excels in nearly every measurable specification, while the Pro 560X retains advantages only in its integrated nature and lower power consumption.

| Field | AMD Radeon RX 7600 XT | AMD Radeon Pro 560X |

| :--- | :--- | :--- |

| Chip | Navi 33 | Polaris 21 |

| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 4.0 |

| Process Node | 6 nm | 14 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | GlobalFoundries |

| Transistors | 13,300 million | 3,000 million |

| Die Size | 204 mm² | 123 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 65.2M / mm² | 24.4M / mm² |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Clock | 2250 MHz, 18 Gbps effective | 1470 MHz, 5.9 Gbps effective |

| Bandwidth | 288.0 GB/s | 94.08 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2048 | 1024 |

| TMUs | 128 | 64 |

| ROPs | 64 | 16 |

| RT Cores | 32 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 176.3 GPixel/s | 16.06 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 352.6 GTexel/s | 64.26 GTexel/s |

| FP32 / FP16 | 22.57 TFLOPS | 2.056 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 190 W | 75 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | None |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_0) |

| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | 204 mm x 115 mm | Not listed |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2024-01-23 | 2018-07-15 |

| Launch MSRP | 329 USD | Not listed |

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains two direct benchmark comparisons, both of which are won by the RX 7600 XT. The first is Geekbench OpenCL, where the RX 7600 XT scores 92426 against the Pro 560X’s 9663. This represents an 856.5% delta, meaning the newer card delivers nearly ten times the compute performance. This is not a marginal improvement; it is a generational leap that reflects the combined effect of a smaller process node, higher clocks, double the shading units, and a much larger memory bandwidth. The Pro 560X’s score is closer to that of integrated graphics from a modern era, while the RX 7600 XT approaches discrete mid-range desktop cards.

The second test is Geekbench Vulkan, where the RX 7600 XT scores 48366 and the Pro 560X scores 16819, a delta of 187.6%. While less extreme than the OpenCL gap, this still indicates a near-tripling of graphics throughput. Vulkan is a low-level API that benefits from architectural efficiency and raw shader throughput, both of which favor the RDNA 3.0 design. The RX 7600 XT’s 32 ray accelerators also contribute to its Vulkan advantage in modern workloads, though the benchmark itself does not isolate ray tracing.

Beyond these direct comparisons, the average scores and percentile rankings reinforce the same conclusion. The RX 7600 XT’s average of 17083 is 13.3% higher than the Pro 560X’s 15082. In the context of their nearest rivals, the RX 7600 XT trades blows with the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 (0.7% lower) and the GTX 690 (0.3% higher), while the Pro 560X sits within 1.2% of the AMD Radeon 680M integrated solution. This places the Pro 560X in a performance tier that is now occupied by high-end integrated graphics, while the RX 7600 XT competes with mid-range desktop discrete cards. The data is clear: the RX 7600 XT is the decisive winner in every recorded benchmark metric, and the Pro 560X’s only distinguishing factors in the database are its lower power draw and integrated form factor.