AMD Radeon Pro 560X vs AMD Radeon RX 7600 Comparison

The AMD Radeon RX 7600 and the AMD Radeon Pro 560X occupy opposite ends of the GPU timeline, and the benchmark data reflects a generational chasm. The RX 7600 is an active, modern part from the Radeon RX 7000 series, while the Pro 560X is an end-of-life mobile chip from the GCN 4.0 era. The most striking result is in the Geekbench OpenCL test, where the RX 7600 scores 88,051 against the Pro 560X's 9,663, a staggering 811.2% advantage. The average benchmark scores, however, tell a more nuanced story: the RX 7600 averages 15,171, while the Pro 560X averages 15,082, a difference of only 0.6% in favor of the newer card. This contradiction between raw compute and aggregate performance is the central theme of this comparison.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two cards share only two direct benchmark comparisons in the data, both from Geekbench. The first is the OpenCL test, where the RX 7600’s 88,051 score obliterates the Pro 560X’s 9,663. That is an 811.2% delta, making it the single largest performance gap in this entire comparison. The RX 7600’s compute advantage is not incremental; it is transformative, reflecting the shift from 2.056 TFLOPS FP32 on the Pro 560X to 21.75 TFLOPS on the RX 7600.

The second head-to-head test is Geekbench Vulkan, where the RX 7600 scores 34,401 versus the Pro 560X’s 16,819. This is a 104.5% advantage, meaning the RX 7600 more than doubles the Pro 560X’s Vulkan performance. While less extreme than the OpenCL gap, this still establishes the RX 7600 as the clear winner in modern graphics API workloads. The Pro 560X does not win any of the two direct comparisons; the RX 7600 wins both.

The picture becomes more complex when looking at the average benchmark scores. The RX 7600’s average of 15,171 places it just 0.2% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM (15,199) and 0.7% behind the AMD Radeon 680M (15,270). The Pro 560X, with its 15,082 average, sits 0.1% ahead of the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Ti (15,063) and 0.8% behind the RTX 3050 OEM. The two cards are effectively neck-and-neck in this aggregate metric, separated by only 89 points. This suggests that while the RX 7600 dominates in compute-heavy tests, the Pro 560X holds its own in certain legacy or driver-optimized workloads that contribute to the average.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600 wins decisively in every workload that stresses raw compute and modern API support. Its OpenCL score of 88,051 is not just ahead of the Pro 560X; it is in a different league entirely, making it the obvious choice for GPGPU tasks, machine learning inference, and any compute-heavy rendering. Its Vulkan score of 34,401 also doubles the Pro 560X, indicating strong performance in Vulkan-based games and applications. For any modern DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) workload, the RX 7600’s architecture is purpose-built, while the Pro 560X only supports DirectX 12 (12_0).

The Pro 560X’s wins are more subtle and come from its role as a legacy mobile GPU. The data shows it averages 15,082, which is only 0.6% below the RX 7600’s average, meaning it is not completely outclassed in overall benchmark pools. It also supports Geekbench Metal, scoring 18,763, a test the RX 7600 does not appear in. This Metal support suggests the Pro 560X retains relevance in macOS environments where Metal is the primary API. The Pro 560X’s 75 W TDP and IGP slot width also indicate it is designed for power-constrained portable systems, where the RX 7600’s 165 W TDP and dual-slot cooler would be impractical.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two GPUs is vast. The RX 7600 uses the Navi 33 chip built on RDNA 3.0 architecture, codenamed "Hotpink Bonefish," fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC. It packs 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 65.2M per mm². The Pro 560X, in contrast, uses the Polaris 21 chip on GCN 4.0 architecture, built on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It has only 3,000 million transistors on a 123 mm² die, with a transistor density of 24.4M per mm².

The RX 7600 features 2,048 shading units, 128 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 64 raster output units (ROPs), along with 32 dedicated ray tracing cores. The Pro 560X has half the shading units at 1,024, half the TMUs at 64, and only 16 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores. This difference in core configuration directly explains the RX 7600’s massive compute lead: its pixel rate is 169.9 GPixel/s versus 16.06 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 339.8 GTexel/s versus 64.26 GTexel/s.

Memory is another major divider. The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 on the same 128-bit bus, but only manages 94.08 GB/s. The RX 7600’s memory clock is 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective), while the Pro 560X’s is 1470 MHz (5.9 Gbps effective). The RX 7600 also supports PCIe 4.0 x8, whereas the Pro 560X is limited to PCIe 3.0 x8. The RX 7600 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Pro 560X is capped at DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3. The RX 7600 was released in 2023 and remains active; the Pro 560X was released in 2018 and is end-of-life.

FAQ

Q: Which card has higher raw compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon RX 7600, with 21.75 TFLOPS FP32, compared to the Pro 560X’s 2.056 TFLOPS. This is reflected in the Geekbench OpenCL score of 88,051 versus 9,663, an 811.2% difference.

Q: Are these cards comparable in overall benchmark averages?

A: Nearly identical. The RX 7600 averages 15,171, and the Pro 560X averages 15,082, a difference of only 0.6% in favor of the RX 7600.

Q: Does the Pro 560X support any API that the RX 7600 does not?

A: Yes. The Pro 560X has a Geekbench Metal score of 18,763, while the RX 7600 has no Metal benchmark listed. The Pro 560X is also listed as supporting Vulkan 1.3, while the RX 7600 supports Vulkan 1.4.

Q: How do the memory specifications differ?

A: The RX 7600 has 8 GB of GDDR6 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the Pro 560X has 4 GB of GDDR5 with 94.08 GB/s bandwidth. Both use a 128-bit bus.

Q: What is the difference in transistor count and process node?

A: The RX 7600 has 13,300 million transistors on a 6 nm TSMC process, while the Pro 560X has 3,000 million transistors on a 14 nm GlobalFoundries process.

Q: Which card is suitable for a desktop PC?

A: The RX 7600 is a dual-slot card with a 1x 8-pin power connector and a suggested 450 W PSU. The Pro 560X is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors, designed for portable devices.

Specification Differences

• Process Node: RX 7600 is 6 nm (TSMC); Pro 560X is 14 nm (GlobalFoundries).
• Transistors: RX 7600 has 13,300 million; Pro 560X has 3,000 million.
• Die Size: RX 7600 is 204 mm²; Pro 560X is 123 mm².
• Transistor Density: RX 7600 is 65.2M / mm²; Pro 560X is 24.4M / mm².
• Shading Units: RX 7600 has 2,048; Pro 560X has 1,024.
• TMUs: RX 7600 has 128; Pro 560X has 64.
• ROPs: RX 7600 has 64; Pro 560X has 16.
• RT Cores: RX 7600 has 32; Pro 560X has none.
• Pixel Rate: RX 7600 is 169.9 GPixel/s; Pro 560X is 16.06 GPixel/s.
• Texture Rate: RX 7600 is 339.8 GTexel/s; Pro 560X is 64.26 GTexel/s.
• FP32 Performance: RX 7600 is 21.75 TFLOPS; Pro 560X is 2.056 TFLOPS.
• Memory Size: RX 7600 is 8 GB GDDR6; Pro 560X is 4 GB GDDR5.
• Memory Bandwidth: RX 7600 is 288.0 GB/s; Pro 560X is 94.08 GB/s.
• TDP: RX 7600 is 165 W; Pro 560X is 75 W.
• Slot Width: RX 7600 is dual-slot; Pro 560X is IGP.
• Power Connectors: RX 7600 has 1x 8-pin; Pro 560X has none.
• Bus Interface: RX 7600 is PCIe 4.0 x8; Pro 560X is PCIe 3.0 x8.
• DirectX Support: RX 7600 is 12 Ultimate (12_2); Pro 560X is 12 (12_0).
• Vulkan Support: RX 7600 is 1.4; Pro 560X is 1.3.
• Production Status: RX 7600 is active; Pro 560X is end-of-life.
• Release Date: RX 7600 is 2023-05-24; Pro 560X is 2018-07-15.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous for compute and modern gaming: the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is the superior GPU. Its 811.2% lead in OpenCL and 104.5% lead in Vulkan are not incremental improvements; they are generational leaps. With 21.75 TFLOPS FP32, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, and support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, the RX 7600 is designed for current and future workloads. Its 32 ray tracing cores make it capable of hardware-accelerated ray tracing, something the Pro 560X cannot do at all. The RX 7600 also holds a 0.6% edge in average benchmark score, meaning it is not giving up anything in aggregate performance.

The AMD Radeon Pro 560X should only be considered if the use case is specifically tied to its unique characteristics. It is an IGP with a 75 W TDP, making it suitable for thin-and-light laptops where the RX 7600’s 165 W dual-slot design would never fit. It also has a Geekbench Metal score of 18,763, which may matter for macOS-based workloads that rely on Metal. Its GCN 4.0 architecture and PCIe 3.0 interface are outdated, but for a legacy system that requires a low-power, no-connector GPU, it remains a functional option.

For anyone building a desktop PC or upgrading a laptop with a discrete GPU, the choice is clear: the RX 7600 wins on every performance metric except power draw. The Pro 560X’s only advantages are its lower power consumption and Metal support, which are niche concerns. The benchmark results show that the RX 7600 is not just faster; it is fundamentally a different class of hardware. The Pro 560X is a relic from 2018, and while its average score is surprisingly close, its real-world compute and API capabilities lag far behind. Pick the RX 7600 for performance; pick the Pro 560X only if you are locked into a legacy, power-limited platform.