AMD Radeon Pro 560 vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500 Comparison

The AMD Radeon Pro 560 and the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 represent two distinct eras of AMD’s professional graphics lineup, separated by over six years of architectural evolution. The benchmark data paints a stark picture: in the two directly comparable tests, the newer Radeon PRO W7500 dominates the older Radeon Pro 560 by margins that are nothing short of transformative. The Radeon Pro 560, an end-of-life product from the GCN 4.0 era, simply cannot keep pace with the RDNA 3.0-based W7500, which delivers performance that places it in a completely different competitive tier.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head results are unambiguous, with the Radeon PRO W7500 securing victories in both benchmark tests where direct comparisons exist. In the Geekbench OpenCL test, the W7500 scores 58,213, while the Radeon Pro 560 manages only 15,504. This represents a delta of -73.4% for the older card, meaning the W7500 is approximately 3.75 times faster in raw compute throughput. This is not a marginal generational improvement; it is a leap that fundamentally changes what workloads are feasible on the hardware.

The Geekbench Vulkan test shows an even wider gap. The Radeon PRO W7500 achieves a score of 68,634, compared to the Radeon Pro 560’s 16,232. The delta here is -76.3%, indicating that the W7500 delivers over four times the Vulkan performance of its predecessor. The 560’s Vulkan score of 16,232 is actually slightly higher than its OpenCL result, suggesting some efficiency in that API, but it is utterly dwarfed by the W7500’s 68,634. The data implies that any modern graphics workload leveraging Vulkan would see a monumental performance uplift with the newer card.

Looking at broader benchmark context, the Radeon Pro 560’s average benchmark score is 17,551, placing it in the 61st percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon 780M (17,588, -0.2%), the AMD Radeon Pro 460 (17,509, +0.2%), the NVIDIA Tesla K40c (17,468, +0.5%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 (17,639, -0.5%). This shows the 560 is a mid-pack performer, competitive with integrated graphics and entry-level discrete solutions from around its launch period. In contrast, the Radeon PRO W7500’s average score is 16,415, which sits in the 59th percentile. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0%), the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361, +0.3%), the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351, +0.4%), and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16,504, -0.5%). The W7500’s average score is lower than the 560’s despite its massive wins in individual tests, likely due to the inclusion of several low-scoring Passmark DirectX tests in its benchmark suite that drag down the average.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon PRO W7500 wins decisively in every measurable compute and graphics workload. Its Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan scores are not just higher; they are in a different league. For professionals running GPU-accelerated rendering, simulation, or machine learning inference, the W7500’s 12.19 TFLOPS of FP32 performance and 24.37 TFLOPS of FP16 performance (2:1 ratio) provide the necessary headroom for complex tasks that would choke the Radeon Pro 560’s 1.858 TFLOPS FP32. The W7500 also features 28 ray tracing cores, a technology completely absent from the 560, making it the only viable choice for any ray-traced workload.

The Radeon Pro 560’s only “win” is in its power efficiency relative to its performance class, but even that is questionable. Its 75 W TDP is actually higher than the W7500’s 70 W TDP, despite the W7500 delivering vastly more performance. The 560’s integrated form factor (IGP) means it is designed for portable devices, whereas the W7500 is a single-slot card with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. For a user with a legacy Mac system requiring a specific form factor, the 560 might be the only option, but from a pure performance standpoint, there is no contest. The data shows zero benchmark wins for the Radeon Pro 560, and the W7500 claims both available victories.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gulf between these two GPUs explains the performance disparity. The Radeon Pro 560 is built on the Polaris 21 chip using the GCN 4.0 architecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It packs 3,000 million transistors into a 123 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 24.4 million per mm². In contrast, the Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip with the RDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated by TSMC on a 6 nm process. This newer node allows for 13,300 million transistors in a 204 mm² die, achieving a density of 65.2 million per mm². The jump from 14 nm to 6 nm is a primary driver of the W7500’s efficiency and performance gains.

Core configurations differ dramatically. The Radeon Pro 560 has 1,024 shading units, 64 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 16 render output units (ROPs). The Radeon PRO W7500 nearly doubles the shading units to 1,792, increases TMUs to 112, and quadruples ROPs to 64. This translates to a pixel rate of 108.8 GPixel/s for the W7500 versus 14.51 GPixel/s for the 560, and a texture rate of 190.4 GTexel/s versus 58.05 GTexel/s. The W7500 also includes 28 ray tracing cores, a feature that did not exist in the GCN 4.0 architecture.

Memory subsystems are also generations apart. The Radeon Pro 560 uses 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 128-bit bus, with a memory clock of 1270 MHz (5.1 Gbps effective) and bandwidth of 81.28 GB/s. The Radeon PRO W7500 doubles capacity to 8 GB of GDDR6, keeps the 128-bit bus, but boosts memory speed to 2000 MHz (16 Gbps effective), resulting in 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth — over three times the 560’s bandwidth. The W7500 also supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the 560 is limited to PCIe 3.0 x8. API support is another differentiator: the W7500 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, whereas the 560 is limited to DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3.

The Verdict

The data unequivocally favors the AMD Radeon PRO W7500 for any user requiring modern graphics performance. With a 73.4% lead in OpenCL and a 76.3% lead in Vulkan, the W7500 offers more than four times the compute performance in the latter test. Its 8 GB of GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth, combined with 28 ray tracing cores and 12.19 TFLOPS FP32, makes it suitable for contemporary professional workloads, from 3D rendering to video editing and AI inference. The 70 W TDP and single-slot design, with four DisplayPort 2.1 outputs, make it a practical drop-in solution for workstations.

The AMD Radeon Pro 560, while an end-of-life product, still holds relevance in one specific niche: legacy Mac portable systems. Its IGP form factor and portable-device-dependent display outputs mean it was designed for integration into laptops where the W7500’s 216 mm length and single-slot profile would not fit. For users locked into that hardware ecosystem, the 560 provides a baseline level of performance, but its 4 GB VRAM and 81.28 GB/s bandwidth are severely limiting. The data shows it ranks in the 61st percentile, but that percentile is based on an aging benchmark pool; modern titles and applications will push it well below that.

Strictly from the data, the choice is clear for anyone building or upgrading a desktop workstation: the Radeon PRO W7500 is the superior GPU in every measurable aspect. The Radeon Pro 560 should only be considered for specific legacy hardware constraints where the W7500 physically cannot be installed. The launch MSRP of 429 USD for the W7500 reflects its professional positioning, but no pricing data exists for the 560 to compare.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher Geekbench Vulkan score?

A: The AMD Radeon PRO W7500 scores 68,634 in Geekbench Vulkan, while the AMD Radeon Pro 560 scores 16,232, giving the W7500 a 76.3% advantage.

Q: How much faster is the Radeon PRO W7500 in OpenCL?

A: The W7500 achieves 58,213 in Geekbench OpenCL versus 15,504 for the Radeon Pro 560, a difference of 73.4% in favor of the W7500.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth difference between the two cards?

A: The Radeon PRO W7500 has 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth with 8 GB GDDR6, while the Radeon Pro 560 has 81.28 GB/s with 4 GB GDDR5, making the W7500 over three times faster in memory throughput.

Q: Do both GPUs support ray tracing?

A: No. The Radeon PRO W7500 features 28 ray tracing cores, while the Radeon Pro 560 has no ray tracing cores at all.

Q: What are the TDP ratings for each card?

A: The Radeon Pro 560 has a TDP of 75 W, and the Radeon PRO W7500 has a slightly lower TDP of 70 W, despite delivering significantly more performance.

Q: Which card has a better percentile ranking among all GPUs?

A: The Radeon Pro 560 ranks in the 61st percentile, which is higher than the Radeon PRO W7500’s 59th percentile, though this is influenced by the different benchmark suites used for each card.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon Pro 560 | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |

| Foundry | GlobalFoundries | TSMC |

| Transistors | 3,000 million | 13,300 million |

| Die Size | 123 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Base Clock | — | 1500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | — | 1700 MHz |

| Memory Size | 4 GB | 8 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |

| Memory Clock | 1270 MHz / 5.1 Gbps effective | 2000 MHz / 16 Gbps effective |

| Memory Bandwidth | 81.28 GB/s | 256.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 1024 | 1792 |

| TMUs | 64 | 112 |

| ROPs | 16 | 64 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | — | 28 |

| Pixel Rate | 14.51 GPixel/s | 108.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 58.05 GTexel/s | 190.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 1.858 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 1.858 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 75 W | 70 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 3.0 x8 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| DirectX Support | 12 (12_0) | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.3 | 1.4 |

| Production Status | End-of-life | Active |

| Release Date | 2017-04-17 | 2023-08-02 |

| Dimensions (LxHxW) | — | 216 mm x 115 mm x 20 mm |