AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT vs AMD Radeon PRO V710 Comparison

AMD Radeon PRO V710 and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT are two workstation-class GPUs from different eras of AMD’s RDNA architecture. The data in the database shows a clear generational gap, not just in raw score but in feature set and memory capacity. The PRO V710 is a large, modern accelerator with no display outputs, while the Pro 5500 XT is an older, end-of-life part that was designed for different workloads. Benchmark results indicate that the PRO V710 dominates in compute tasks, but the Pro 5500 XT has its own niche in specific API tests. This analysis breaks down where each card wins, what separates them architecturally, and which buyer should choose which.

Where Each One Wins

The PRO V710 wins in every recorded head-to-head benchmark. The only direct comparison in the database is Geekbench OpenCL, where the PRO V710 scores 116,460 against the Pro 5500 XT’s 41,772, a delta of 178.8%. That is not a small margin; it is a near-tripling of compute throughput in a general-purpose GPU compute workload. For any task that relies on OpenCL acceleration, whether rendering, simulation, or data processing, the PRO V710 is the only rational choice.

The Pro 5500 XT’s best showing is in Geekbench Metal, where it scores 54,779. This is a macOS-oriented API benchmark, and the card also records 39,601 in Geekbench Vulkan. However, these scores are not directly comparable to the PRO V710 because the database does not list equivalent Metal or Vulkan results for the newer card. What the data does show is that the Pro 5500 XT is competitive within its own generation: its average benchmark score of 45,384 places it near the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM (58,085) and Intel Arc A570M (58,239) among its rivals, with deltas of 1% and 0.7% respectively. But against the PRO V710, the 5500 XT is outclassed in raw compute.

Where the Pro 5500 XT might still appeal is in legacy or API-specific environments. Its DirectX support is only 12 (12_1), whereas the PRO V710 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). If a workload is locked to an older feature level, the 5500 XT’s lower compute could be acceptable, but the PRO V710’s higher bandwidth and larger memory make it the superior choice for any modern workload. In short, the PRO V710 wins on compute, memory, and API support; the Pro 5500 XT wins only in the sense that it has recorded scores in Metal and Vulkan that the PRO V710 does not have in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations. The PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0, built on a 5 nm TSMC process with the Navi 32 chip, codenamed Wheat Nas. It packs 28,100 million transistors on a 346 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 81.2 million per mm². The Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0, built on a 7 nm TSMC process with the Navi 14 chip. It has 6,400 million transistors on a 158 mm² die, with a density of 40.5 million per mm². The process node difference alone explains much of the performance gap: the PRO V710 has over four times the transistor count, and nearly double the density.

Core configuration differs massively. The PRO V710 has 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, and 96 ROPs, plus 54 ray tracing cores. The Pro 5500 XT has 1,536 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, and no dedicated ray tracing cores. That means the PRO V710 can handle ray-traced workloads natively, while the Pro 5500 XT cannot, a feature gap that is critical for modern rendering pipelines. The PRO V710’s pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s and texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s, versus 56.22 GPixel/s and 168.7 GTexel/s for the older card. FP32 compute is listed at 27.65 TFLOPS for the PRO V710, and 5.398 TFLOPS for the Pro 5500 XT. FP16 is also different: the PRO V710 does 27.65 TFLOPS at 1:1 ratio, while the Pro 5500 XT does 10.80 TFLOPS at 2:1, meaning the newer card does not rely on packed math for its peak throughput.

Memory is another major split. The PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, delivering 504.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Pro 5500 XT has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, with 224.0 GB/s. That is 3.5 times the capacity and over twice the bandwidth, which directly impacts large dataset workloads and high-resolution textures. The PRO V710 also uses a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface, while the Pro 5500 XT is limited to PCIe 4.0 x8, halving the link bandwidth to the host system. Both cards have no display outputs, so they are intended for compute or rendering nodes rather than desktop use. Power draw is higher on the PRO V710 at 158 W TDP versus 125 W, but it requires a single 8-pin connector and a 450 W suggested PSU, while the Pro 5500 XT has no power connectors and a 300 W suggested PSU.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The PRO V710 has 28 GB of GDDR6 on a 224-bit bus, while the Pro 5500 XT has 8 GB on a 128-bit bus. The PRO V710 also has more than double the bandwidth: 504.0 GB/s versus 224.0 GB/s.

Q: Does the Pro 5500 XT support ray tracing?

A: No. The Pro 5500 XT has no ray tracing cores, while the PRO V710 has 54. This means the PRO V710 can handle hardware-accelerated ray tracing workloads, but the Pro 5500 XT cannot.

Q: What are the API differences?

A: The PRO V710 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4. The Pro 5500 XT supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and Vulkan 1.4. Both support OpenGL 4.6. The PRO V710’s higher DirectX feature level allows it to run newer games and applications that require DX12 Ultimate features.

Q: Which card is more power efficient?

A: The Pro 5500 XT has a lower TDP at 125 W versus 158 W for the PRO V710. However, the PRO V710’s performance per watt is far higher, given its 178.8% lead in OpenCL benchmarks. The Pro 5500 XT requires no power connectors, while the PRO V710 needs a single 8-pin.

Q: Are these cards suitable for desktop display output?

A: No. Both cards have no display outputs. They are designed for compute, rendering, or server environments where a separate display adapter is used.

Q: What is the release date difference?

A: The Pro 5500 XT was released on 2020-08-03 and is marked as end-of-life. The PRO V710 was released on 2024-10-02 and has no stated production status. The PRO V710 is a much newer product from a later RDNA generation.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in almost every major specification. The PRO V710 uses RDNA 3.0 on a 5 nm process with Navi 32, while the Pro 5500 XT uses RDNA 1.0 on a 7 nm process with Navi 14. The PRO V710 has 28,100 million transistors versus 6,400 million, and a die size of 346 mm² versus 158 mm². Clock speeds differ: the PRO V710 runs at 1900 MHz base and 2000 MHz boost, while the Pro 5500 XT runs at 1187 MHz base and 1757 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) for the PRO V710, and 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective) for the Pro 5500 XT.

Shader resources are not comparable: 3,456 shading units, 216 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 54 RT cores on the PRO V710; 1,536 shading units, 96 TMUs, 32 ROPs, and no RT cores on the Pro 5500 XT. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 56.22 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 432.0 GTexel/s versus 168.7 GTexel/s. FP32 compute is 27.65 TFLOPS versus 5.398 TFLOPS. FP16 is 27.65 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 10.80 TFLOPS (2:1). Memory size, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the PRO V710: 28 GB, 224-bit, 504.0 GB/s versus 8 GB, 128-bit, 224.0 GB/s.

Power and physical design differ too. The PRO V710 has a 158 W TDP, is single-slot, and uses a 1x 8-pin power connector with a 450 W suggested PSU. The Pro 5500 XT has a 125 W TDP, is listed as IGP (integrated graphics package), has no power connectors, and a 300 W suggested PSU. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x16 on the PRO V710 and PCIe 4.0 x8 on the Pro 5500 XT. The PRO V710’s generation is “Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series)” and its codename is Wheat Nas; the Pro 5500 XT has no codename listed and its generation is “Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Series)”. The Pro 5500 XT is end-of-life, while the PRO V710 has no production status listed. The PRO V710’s predecessor is the Radeon Pro Vega; the Pro 5500 XT has no predecessor listed.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct head-to-head benchmark in the database is Geekbench OpenCL. The PRO V710 scores 116,460, and the Pro 5500 XT scores 41,772. The PRO V710 wins by 178.8%, which is a massive margin. To put that in context, the PRO V710’s average benchmark score across all tests is 58,657, while the Pro 5500 XT’s average is 45,384. That is a 29.2% difference in favor of the PRO V710, but the OpenCL test shows a much larger gap because it stresses raw compute throughput, where the PRO V710’s 27.65 TFLOPS FP32 and 504.0 GB/s bandwidth shine.

The Pro 5500 XT does have recorded scores in Metal and Vulkan that the PRO V710 lacks. In Geekbench Metal, it scores 54,779, and in Geekbench Vulkan, 39,601. These are not comparable to the PRO V710, but they show that the Pro 5500 XT is not a weak card in its own right. Its average score of 45,384 is within 1.3% of the NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation (45,972) and 0.5% of the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile (45,152), according to the nearest rivals list. The PRO V710’s nearest rivals are different: it sits 0.2% behind the NVIDIA P102-100 (58,528) and 0.5% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT (58,392).

The biggest win for the PRO V710 is the OpenCL score, where it is nearly three times faster. The Pro 5500 XT’s best showing is in Metal, where it exceeds its own OpenCL score by 31.1%, but that still does not close the gap to the PRO V710’s OpenCL result. In short, the data shows a single decisive benchmark, and the PRO V710 wins it overwhelmingly.

The Verdict

The AMD Radeon PRO V710 is the clear choice for any compute-heavy workload. Its 178.8% lead in OpenCL, 28 GB of memory, and 504.0 GB/s bandwidth make it suitable for large datasets, rendering, and GPU compute tasks. It also supports DirectX 12 Ultimate and has ray tracing cores, which the Pro 5500 XT lacks entirely. The PRO V710’s 158 W TDP is higher, but it is still a single-slot card with a modest power requirement, and its performance per watt is far superior given the benchmark results.

The AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT is an end-of-life product from 2020. It is not competitive against the PRO V710 in any recorded benchmark, and its 8 GB memory and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth are limiting for modern workloads. However, if a system is locked to macOS and requires Metal performance, the Pro 5500 XT does have a recorded score of 54,779 in that API, which the database does not list for the PRO V710. That is the only scenario where the older card has a documented advantage, and it is not a performance lead, merely a compatibility data point.

For most buyers, the PRO V710 is the only sensible option. The data shows a generational leap in architecture, memory, and compute. The Pro 5500 XT should only be considered if you have a specific need for its API support and can tolerate its far lower performance. Otherwise, the PRO V710 is the definitive answer.