AMD Radeon Pro 5300 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti and AMD Radeon Pro 5300 occupy vastly different corners of the GPU market, with the former being a high-end desktop enthusiast card and the latter a low-power integrated solution for Apple Mac systems. The benchmark data reveals a stark performance chasm, yet each card serves a distinct purpose. This analysis compares their head-to-head results, architectural foundations, and specification sheets to determine where each GPU excels based solely on the provided data.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two shared benchmark results leave no room for ambiguity regarding performance hierarchy. In Geekbench OpenCL, the RTX 4070 Ti scores 176,953 points against the Radeon Pro 5300’s 38,747 points. That represents a 356.7% advantage for the NVIDIA card, meaning it delivers roughly four and a half times the compute throughput in this API. The gap is even more pronounced in Geekbench Vulkan, where the RTX 4070 Ti posts 213,808 points versus 35,793 points for the AMD card, a 497.3% delta — nearly six times the performance.

These results are consistent with the cards’ wider benchmark profiles. The RTX 4070 Ti’s average benchmark score sits at 44,795, placing it in the 84th percentile of all GPUs. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (44,075, 1.6% slower) and the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (45,384, 1.3% faster), showing it trades blows with professional workstation-class hardware. The Radeon Pro 5300, by contrast, averages 40,870, sitting in the 82nd percentile, with its nearest rival being the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (41,187, 0.8% faster). Despite the enormous head-to-head deficit, the Radeon Pro 5300’s percentile ranking indicates it is not a weak performer in absolute terms — it simply competes in a different league.

The RTX 4070 Ti also shows strength in other benchmark suites. It scores 31,624 in Passmark G3D, 18,396 in Passmark GPU Compute, and 5,024 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The Radeon Pro 5300 has no comparable results in these tests, but its Geekbench Metal score of 48,070 highlights its Apple-centric design, as Metal is the primary graphics API on macOS. The head-to-head data confirms the RTX 4070 Ti wins both shared tests, giving it 2 wins and 0 losses, but the Radeon Pro 5300’s Metal performance remains its unique selling point.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti averages 44,795 across all benchmarks, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5300 averages 40,870. The NVIDIA card leads by roughly 9.6% in aggregate, despite winning the head-to-head Vulkan test by 497.3%.

Q: How does the Radeon Pro 5300 compare to the RTX 4070 Ti in Geekbench Vulkan?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti scores 213,808 in Geekbench Vulkan versus 35,793 for the Radeon Pro 5300, giving NVIDIA a 497.3% advantage. This is the largest performance delta between the two cards in any shared test.

Q: What benchmark does the Radeon Pro 5300 perform best in?

A: The Radeon Pro 5300’s strongest result is in Geekbench Metal, where it scores 48,070. This test is not available for the RTX 4070 Ti, but it indicates the AMD card is optimized for Apple’s Metal graphics API.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti considered an end-of-life product?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Ti has a production status of "End-of-life," as does the Radeon Pro 5300. Both cards have been discontinued, though the RTX 4070 Ti has a successor in the GeForce 50 series.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti’s nearest rival by average score?

A: The NVIDIA RTX A6000 is the closest rival, with an average score of 44,075, which is 1.6% lower than the RTX 4070 Ti’s 44,795. The Intel Arc A730M is 1.7% lower at 45,592, while the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT is 1.3% higher at 45,384.

Q: Does the Radeon Pro 5300 support ray tracing?

A: The data shows no ray tracing cores listed for the Radeon Pro 5300, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti includes 60 RT cores. This suggests the AMD card lacks dedicated ray tracing hardware.

Architecture Differences

The architectural divide between these two GPUs is fundamental. The RTX 4070 Ti is built on NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It features 35,800 million transistors packed into a 294 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 121.8 million per mm². The Radeon Pro 5300 uses AMD’s older RDNA 1.0 architecture, manufactured on a 7 nm process, also at TSMC. Its die measures 158 mm² and contains 6,400 million transistors, for a density of 40.5 million per mm². The RTX 4070 Ti’s chip, the AD104, is physically larger and denser, reflecting its newer node and more complex design.

The RTX 4070 Ti is equipped with 7,680 shading units, 240 TMUs, and 80 ROPs, along with 60 ray tracing cores and 240 tensor cores. The Radeon Pro 5300, based on the Navi 14 chip, has 1,280 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no dedicated RT or tensor cores listed. This means the RTX 4070 Ti can accelerate ray tracing and AI workloads in hardware, while the Radeon Pro 5300 relies on traditional shader-based compute. The FP32 throughput confirms this: the RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS, while the Radeon Pro 5300 manages 4.224 TFLOPS — a factor of nearly 9.5.

Memory architecture also diverges sharply. The RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus, providing 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon Pro 5300 has 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus, yielding 224.0 GB/s. The NVIDIA card’s memory runs at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective), while the AMD card’s runs at 1750 MHz (14 Gbps effective). The RTX 4070 Ti’s higher bandwidth and larger capacity make it suited for high-resolution textures and large datasets, whereas the Radeon Pro 5300’s smaller pool limits it to lighter workloads.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in nearly every measurable specification. The RTX 4070 Ti has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, while the Radeon Pro 5300 operates at 1000 MHz base and 1650 MHz boost. Power consumption is another major differentiator: the RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 W with a suggested 600 W PSU, while the Radeon Pro 5300 draws only 85 W with a suggested 250 W PSU. The RTX 4070 Ti requires a 1x 16-pin power connector and occupies a dual-slot form factor, whereas the Radeon Pro 5300 is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no power connectors and no display outputs.

Physical dimensions also set them apart. The RTX 4070 Ti measures 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. The Radeon Pro 5300 has no listed dimensions, reflecting its IGP nature. The RTX 4070 Ti connects via PCIe 4.0 x16 and offers 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, while the Radeon Pro 5300 uses PCIe 4.0 x8 and has no outputs, as it is designed for integration into Mac systems. API support differs as well: the RTX 4070 Ti supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Radeon Pro 5300 supports DirectX 12 (12_1). Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

The release dates are also far apart. The RTX 4070 Ti launched on January 2, 2023, with a launch MSRP of 799 USD, while the Radeon Pro 5300 came out on August 3, 2020, with no MSRP listed. The RTX 4070 Ti’s predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series; the Radeon Pro 5300 has no predecessor or successor listed.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti wins decisively in raw compute performance, as evidenced by its 356.7% OpenCL and 497.3% Vulkan leads. It is the clear choice for demanding gaming, 3D rendering, and compute-heavy professional workloads, backed by its 40.09 TFLOPS FP32 throughput and 60 RT cores. Its 12 GB VRAM and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth accommodate large assets, while its 84th percentile ranking places it among the top tier of all GPUs. For users needing DirectX 12 Ultimate features, ray tracing, or tensor core acceleration, the RTX 4070 Ti is the only option between the two.

The Radeon Pro 5300 wins in efficiency and integration. Its 85 W TDP is less than a third of the RTX 4070 Ti’s 285 W, and its IGP design means it requires no power connectors or dedicated cooling. It is built for Apple Mac systems, as evidenced by its Geekbench Metal score of 48,070 — a benchmark absent for the NVIDIA card. While its 82nd percentile ranking is close to the RTX 4070 Ti’s 84th, its actual workload capability is far lower, with 4 GB VRAM and 4.224 TFLOPS. The Radeon Pro 5300 wins for users who need a low-power, no-frills GPU for macOS environments where compatibility and thermal simplicity matter more than raw speed.

In terms of competitor positioning, the RTX 4070 Ti sits near the NVIDIA RTX A6000 (1.6% faster) and AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT (1.3% slower), indicating it holds its own against workstation cards. The Radeon Pro 5300’s nearest rival is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti (0.8% faster), a desktop gaming card, which underscores its mid-range standing. The data shows no scenario where the Radeon Pro 5300 beats the RTX 4070 Ti in a shared benchmark, but its specialized role as a Mac-compatible, low-power GPU gives it a distinct niche. For any application requiring maximum performance, the RTX 4070 Ti is the definitive winner; for Apple-centric, energy-conscious builds, the Radeon Pro 5300 remains relevant.