AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon HD 7950

CORE STATE Tahiti
VRAM 3 GB
CLOCK SPEED —
TDP 200 W
BUS WIDTH 384 bit
ARCHITECTURE GCN 1.0
nm
PROCESS 28 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2012
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

CORE STATE GB205
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1447 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Blackwell 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
33,951
N/A
geekbench_opencl
N/A
143,870
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
139,213
passmark_directx_10
N/A
151
passmark_directx_11
N/A
237
passmark_directx_12
N/A
102
passmark_directx_9
N/A
259
passmark_g2d
N/A
981
passmark_g3d
N/A
24,004
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
10,101

Analysis: AMD Radeon HD 7950 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7950

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and AMD Radeon HD 7950 are separated by more than a decade of GPU evolution, and the benchmark data reflects that gulf clearly. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile among all GPUs, while the HD 7950 lands at the 78th percentile, but that near-parity in percentile masks a massive gap in raw performance and capability. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers an average benchmark score of 35,435, while the HD 7950 averages 33,951. That 4.4% average-score gap, however, understates how differently these cards perform across workloads, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's modern feature set makes it the only sensible choice for current software.

The Verdict

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is the clear pick for anyone running modern games, compute workloads, or applications that leverage DirectX 12 Ultimate features. It is 4.4% ahead of the HD 7950 in average benchmark score, but that figure comes from a single Geekbench Metal result for the AMD card versus a nine-test suite for the NVIDIA card. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 in Geekbench OpenCL and 139,213 in Geekbench Vulkan — tests the HD 7950 simply cannot run at comparable settings due to its lack of modern API support. The HD 7950's only benchmark entry is Geekbench Metal at 33,951, which is 76.4% lower than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's OpenCL score. For gaming, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 24,004 dwarfs anything the HD 7950 could produce, and the NVIDIA card supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) versus the AMD card's DirectX 12 (11_1). The HD 7950 is an end-of-life product from 2012; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an active product released in 2025. There is no scenario where the HD 7950 is the better purchase for new workloads, though its dual-slot design and 2x 6-pin power connectors might appeal to retro-build enthusiasts.

The HD 7950's lone advantage is its 78th percentile ranking, which is only two points below the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 80th percentile. That suggests the AMD card remains competitive in certain legacy benchmarks, likely due to its 384-bit memory bus and 3 GB of GDDR5. But the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7, 4x the memory capacity, and 2.8x the bandwidth at 672.0 GB/s versus 240.0 GB/s. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's nearest rivals — the Quadro GV100 (-0.2%), Radeon Pro Duo (-1.2%), A2 (+2.1%), and T1000 (-2.4%) — are all professional or workstation cards, indicating its performance class. The HD 7950's nearest rivals — RX 480 (-0.1%), RX 7700S (+0.3%), RX 560 XT (-0.5%), and RTX A2000 12 GB (-0.6%) — are all much newer architectures, which shows how far the HD 7950's architecture has aged.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every compute and modern API scenario. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 143,870 is 4.2x higher than the HD 7950's Geekbench Metal score of 33,951. The Vulkan score of 139,213 further demonstrates its strength in modern graphics APIs. The PassMark suite shows the NVIDIA card's dominance across DirectX versions: 151 in DirectX 10, 237 in DirectX 11, 102 in DirectX 12, and 259 in DirectX 9. The HD 7950 has no PassMark entries, so direct comparison is impossible, but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 24,004 and GPU compute score of 10,101 indicate strong overall rendering and compute capability. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile also has 46 RT cores and 184 tensor cores, enabling ray tracing and AI acceleration that the HD 7950 lacks entirely.

The HD 7950's only measurable win is its percentile ranking, which is just 2 points below the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. In terms of architecture, the HD 7950's 352 mm² die with 4,313 million transistors on a 28 nm process is larger than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 263 mm² die with 31,100 million transistors on a 5 nm process. The AMD card's 384-bit memory bus is double the NVIDIA card's 192-bit bus, though the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's GDDR7 memory runs at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) versus the HD 7950's 1250 MHz (5 Gbps effective), resulting in the NVIDIA card's 672.0 GB/s bandwidth versus 240.0 GB/s. The HD 7950's 200 W TDP is 3.3x higher than the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's 60 W TDP, making the NVIDIA card dramatically more power-efficient. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP form factor with no power connectors, while the HD 7950 is a dual-slot card requiring 2x 6-pin connectors and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Architecture Differences

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip on NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture, built on a 5 nm process at TSMC. It packs 31,100 million transistors into a 263 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 118.3M per mm². The HD 7950 uses the Tahiti chip on AMD's GCN 1.0 architecture, built on a 28 nm process at TSMC, with 4,313 million transistors on a 352 mm² die and a density of 12.3M per mm². The NVIDIA card has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores. The AMD card has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, with no RT or tensor cores. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's FP32 throughput is 17.04 TFLOPS with FP16 at 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio), while the HD 7950 manages 2.867 TFLOPS FP32 with no FP16 support listed. The pixel rate difference is 115.8 GPixel/s versus 25.60 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 266.2 GTexel/s versus 89.60 GTexel/s — both heavily favoring the NVIDIA card.

The memory subsystems are radically different. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus at 672.0 GB/s. The HD 7950 has 3 GB of GDDR5 on a 384-bit bus at 240.0 GB/s. While the AMD card's wider bus is theoretically better for certain memory-bound workloads, the NVIDIA card's faster memory technology and 4x capacity make it far more capable for modern games that exceed 3 GB of VRAM. API support also differs: the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the HD 7950 supports DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170. The NVIDIA card's newer Vulkan version and DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set enable mesh shaders, variable rate shading, and hardware ray tracing — none of which exist on the AMD card.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in raw compute performance?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 17.04 TFLOPS FP32 versus the HD 7950's 2.867 TFLOPS, making it roughly 5.9x faster in theoretical compute. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 143,870 is 4.2x higher than the HD 7950's Geekbench Metal score of 33,951.

Q: Can the HD 7950 handle modern games?

A: The HD 7950's DirectX 12 (11_1) support and 3 GB of GDDR5 memory are below the requirements of most modern titles. Its single Geekbench Metal score of 33,951 and 78th percentile ranking suggest it can still run older or lighter games, but it lacks the RT cores and tensor cores that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses for ray tracing and AI features.

Q: Which GPU is more power-efficient?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has a 60 W TDP versus the HD 7950's 200 W TDP, making the NVIDIA card 3.3x more power-efficient. The NVIDIA card is an IGP with no power connectors, while the AMD card is a dual-slot card requiring 2x 6-pin connectors and a 550 W suggested PSU.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 on a 192-bit bus with 672.0 GB/s bandwidth. The HD 7950 has 3 GB of GDDR5 on a 384-bit bus with 240.0 GB/s bandwidth. The NVIDIA card has 4x the capacity and 2.8x the bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: Only the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports ray tracing, with 46 dedicated RT cores. The HD 7950 has no RT cores or tensor cores, so it cannot accelerate ray tracing or AI workloads.

Q: How do their production statuses compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an active product released on 2025-02-28, while the HD 7950 is end-of-life, released on 2012-01-30. The HD 7950's launch MSRP was 449 USD, but no pricing information is available for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only directly comparable benchmark between these two GPUs is Geekbench, where the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile scores 143,870 in OpenCL and 139,213 in Vulkan, while the HD 7950 scores 33,951 in Metal. The OpenCL score is 4.2x higher than the Metal score, and even the NVIDIA card's Vulkan score is 4.1x higher. This indicates the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is roughly 4x faster in compute-heavy workloads, despite the HD 7950's 78th percentile ranking being only 2 points lower than the NVIDIA card's 80th percentile.

In the PassMark suite, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile shows strong DirectX performance: 259 in DirectX 9, 151 in DirectX 10, 237 in DirectX 11, and 102 in DirectX 12. The HD 7950 has no PassMark results, so we cannot directly compare these numbers. However, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's PassMark G3D score of 24,004 places it well above the HD 7950's average benchmark score of 33,951 when you consider that the G3D test is a composite of multiple rendering workloads. The NVIDIA card's GPU compute score of 10,101 further demonstrates its advantage in parallel processing tasks.

The nearest-rival comparisons provide additional context. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits within 2.4% of the Quadro GV100 (-0.2%), Radeon Pro Duo (-1.2%), A2 (+2.1%), and T1000 (-2.4%) — all professional-grade cards with similar average scores ranging from 34,690 to 36,289. The HD 7950 sits within 0.6% of the RX 480 (-0.1%), RX 7700S (+0.3%), RX 560 XT (-0.5%), and RTX A2000 12 GB (-0.6%), with average scores from 33,849 to 34,154. This shows the HD 7950 is competitive with much newer mid-range cards, but the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is in a higher performance tier altogether.

Specification Differences

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile and HD 7950 differ in nearly every specification. The NVIDIA card uses the GB205 chip on Blackwell 2.0 architecture with a 5 nm process, while the AMD card uses Tahiti on GCN 1.0 with a 28 nm process. Transistor counts are 31,100 million versus 4,313 million, die sizes are 263 mm² versus 352 mm², and transistor densities are 118.3M/mm² versus 12.3M/mm². The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5,888 shading units, 184 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 46 RT cores, and 184 tensor cores; the HD 7950 has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 32 ROPs with no RT or tensor cores. Clock speeds show the NVIDIA card boosting to 1447 MHz with a base of 847 MHz, while the HD 7950 has no listed base or boost clocks, only a memory clock of 1250 MHz (5 Gbps effective). Memory differs: 12 GB GDDR7 on 192-bit versus 3 GB GDDR5 on 384-bit, yielding 672.0 GB/s versus 240.0 GB/s. Pixel rate is 115.8 GPixel/s versus 25.60 GPixel/s, texture rate is 266.2 GTexel/s versus 89.60 GTexel/s, and FP32 is 17.04 TFLOPS versus 2.867 TFLOPS. TDP is 60 W versus 200 W. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP with no power connectors, while the HD 7950 is a dual-slot card with 2x 6-pin connectors requiring a 550 W PSU. Bus interfaces are PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 3.0 x16. Display outputs are portable-device-dependent versus 1x DVI, 1x HDMI 1.4a, and 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2. The HD 7950 is 278 mm long, 111 mm tall, and 38 mm wide; the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has no listed dimensions. API support favors the NVIDIA card with DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4 versus DirectX 12 (11_1) and Vulkan 1.2.170. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile's predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile, while the HD 7950's predecessor is Northern Islands and successor is Sea Islands. Production status is Active versus End-of-life, and release dates are 2025-02-28 versus 2012-01-30.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
HD 7950
RTX 5070 Ti Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
1,792
5,888 +228.6%
Shaders
1,792
5,888 +228.6%
TMUs
112
184 +64.3%
ROPs
32
80 +150.0%
Compute Units
28
—
SM Count
—
46
Clocks
Base Clock
—
847 MHz
Boost Clock
—
1447 MHz
GPU Clock
800 MHz
—
Memory Clock
1250 MHz 5 Gbps effective
1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
3 GB
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
3,072
12,288 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR7
Memory Bus
384 bit
192 bit
Bandwidth
240.0 GB/s
672.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
768 KB
48 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
25.60 GPixel/s
115.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
89.60 GTexel/s
266.2 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS
17.04 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
716.8 GFLOPS (1:4)
266.2 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
—
17.04 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
—
46
Tensor Cores
—
184
Power
TDP
200 W
60 W
TDP (W)
200
60 -70.0%
Suggested PSU
550 W
—
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
None
Architecture
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Blackwell 2.0
GPU Name
Tahiti
GB205
Generation
Southern Islands (HD 7900)
GeForce 50 Mobile
Process Size
28 nm
5 nm
Transistors
4,313 million
31,100 million
Die Size
352 mm²
263 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
12.3M / mm²
118.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (11_1)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.2.170
1.4
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
3.0
CUDA
—
12.0
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
IGP
Length
278 mm 10.9 inches
—
Height
111 mm 4.4 inches
—
Outputs
1x DVI1x HDMI 1.4a2x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
PCIe 5.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
449 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Northern Islands
GeForce 40 Mobile
Successor
Sea Islands
—
View Radeon HD 7950 Details View GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Details