GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP

CORE STATE Raphael
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
N/A
30,607
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
28,964
passmark_directx_10
N/A
31
passmark_directx_11
N/A
33
passmark_directx_12
N/A
29
passmark_directx_9
N/A
69
passmark_g2d
N/A
625
passmark_g3d
N/A
5,433
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
2,157

Analysis: AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP vs Intel Arc A310

The graphics card matchup between Arc A310 from Intel and AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP from AMD shows impressively competitive benchmark scores. The two graphics cards alternate leads across diverse games, with none establishing a clear edge. The benchmark results confirms this observation. Neither GPU dominates consistently. Users confront a real choice with these options.

As opposed to obsessing on slight frame rate gains, potential users can consider secondary variables. thermal performance, fan noise, design, and after-sales quality frequently are important more than slight benchmark deltas. All these considerations can affect the balance. Evaluate beyond just performance. The full package is important.

When benchmark scores is so similar, value and features become the key elements. Examine hardware RT quality, DLSS/FSR support, energy efficiency, and ecosystem quality when picking between Arc A310 from Intel and AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP from AMD. These considerations could tip the balance. Weigh holistically. This larger picture plays a role.

For buyers torn between Arc A310 from Intel and AMD Radeon Graphics 128SP from AMD, feel certain that any selection provides equivalent gaming performance. This benchmark data supports zero obvious champion. Make your determination on other elements and appreciate solid rendering performance regardless. Each are champions in their own regard. Choose confidently.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Graphics 128SP
A310
Core Specs
Shading Units
128
768 +500.0%
Shaders
128
768 +500.0%
TMUs
8
32 +300.0%
ROPs
8
16 +100.0%
Compute Units
2
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
124.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
28.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
17.60 GTexel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
563.2 GFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
35.20 GFLOPS (1:16)
672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
1,126.4 GFLOPS (2:1)
5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
2
6 +200.0%
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
15 W
30 W
TDP (W)
15
30 +100.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Raphael
DG2-128
Generation
Navi II IGP (Raphael)
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Process Size
5 nm
6 nm
Transistors
3,400 million
7,200 million
Die Size
264 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
12.9M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Xe Graphics
Successor
Navi III IGP
Battlemage
View Radeon Graphics 128SP Details View Arc A310 Details