AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

The Verdict

The recorded data positions both the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO at the 50th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with average benchmark scores of zero for each. Neither unit has a benchmark advantage over the other in the head-to-head comparison, which records zero wins for either side. The absence of measured performance deltas means the database cannot declare a definitive performance winner. The AMD part uses the RDNA 4.0 architecture on a 4 nm process with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Lisuan Tech part uses the TrueGPU architecture on a 6 nm process with 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. For workloads that depend on memory capacity, the AMD unit holds a 33.3% advantage in memory size. For workloads that depend on raw shading unit count, the Lisuan unit holds a 100.0% advantage in shading units. The data indicates these two cards target different tradeoffs, and the correct choice depends on which resource the target workload consumes more heavily.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is built on the Navi 48 chip using the RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. It uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, producing a transistor density of 151.0M per mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with the TrueGPU architecture, part of the 7G100 generation, on a 6 nm process at TSMC. The database does not list transistor count or die size for the Lisuan part, and no transistor density value is recorded. The AMD card supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Lisuan card supports PCIe 4.0 x16. The AMD card lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, while the Lisuan card lists DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. The AMD card exposes a single DisplayPort 2.1a output, whereas the Lisuan card exposes four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The AMD card has 3,072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and no ray tracing core count listed. The AMD card records a boost clock of 2020 MHz and a base clock of 1080 MHz, while the Lisuan card has no base or boost clock values in the database. The AMD card shows FP16 throughput at 24.82 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio to FP32, while the Lisuan card shows FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. The architecture difference is therefore not just process node and chip design, but also feature support: the AMD card carries ray tracing cores and newer display and bus interfaces, while the Lisuan card doubles the shading unit count and offers double-rate FP16.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The head-to-head benchmark table contains no entries. The database records zero wins for the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D and zero wins for the Lisuan Tech LX PRO, and the average benchmark score for both is zero. With no measured scores, the closest comparative signals come from the computed throughput rates and memory characteristics. The AMD card delivers 24.82 TFLOPS FP32, while the Lisuan card delivers 24.58 TFLOPS FP32, a difference of only 0.98% in favor of the AMD part. Pixel rate favors AMD at 193.9 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, a 0.99% difference. Texture rate also favors AMD at 387.8 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s, a 0.99% difference. Memory bandwidth favors AMD at 576.0 GB/s versus 432.0 GB/s, a 33.3% difference. The Lisuan card counters with 6,144 shading units versus 3,072, a 100.0% difference, and FP16 throughput of 49.15 TFLOPS versus 24.82 TFLOPS, a 98.0% difference. The FP32 figures are nearly identical, which suggests the shading unit count difference is offset by clock speed differences, but the database does not list clocks for the Lisuan card to confirm. The FP16 result is a clear architectural split: the Lisuan card runs double-rate FP16, while the AMD card runs FP16 at the same rate as FP32. The memory bandwidth gap is the largest measured difference in the AMD card's favor.

Specification Differences

The two cards differ in several recorded fields. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses a 4 nm process; the Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process. The AMD card is built on RDNA 4.0 with the Navi 48 chip; the Lisuan card uses TrueGPU with the 7G105 chip. The AMD card lists 53,900 million transistors and a 357 mm² die size; the Lisuan card has no transistor or die size data. The AMD card has 3,072 shading units; the Lisuan card has 6,144 shading units, exactly double. Both have 192 TMUs and 96 ROPs. The AMD card has 48 ray tracing cores; the Lisuan card has no ray tracing core count listed. The AMD card has a base clock of 1080 MHz and a boost clock of 2020 MHz; the Lisuan card has no base or boost clock data. Both list memory clocks at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective. Memory size is 32 GB for AMD versus 24 GB for Lisuan, a 33.3% difference. Memory bus width is 256 bit for AMD versus 192 bit for Lisuan. Memory bandwidth is 576.0 GB/s for AMD versus 432.0 GB/s for Lisuan, a 33.3% difference. Pixel rate is 193.9 GPixel/s for AMD versus 192.0 GPixel/s for Lisuan. Texture rate is 387.8 GTexel/s for AMD versus 384.0 GTexel/s for Lisuan. FP32 is 24.82 TFLOPS for AMD versus 24.58 TFLOPS for Lisuan. FP16 is 24.82 TFLOPS at 1:1 for AMD versus 49.15 TFLOPS at 2:1 for Lisuan. TDP is 150 W for AMD versus 225 W for Lisuan. The AMD card is single-slot with dimensions of 241 mm length, 111 mm height, and 19 mm width; the Lisuan card is dual-slot with dimensions of 248 mm length, 118 mm height, and 48 mm width. Both use a single 16-pin power connector. Suggested PSU is 450 W for AMD versus 550 W for Lisuan. The AMD card uses PCIe 5.0 x16; the Lisuan card uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The AMD card has one DisplayPort 2.1a output; the Lisuan card has four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs. The AMD card supports Vulkan 1.4; the Lisuan card supports Vulkan 1.3. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The AMD card has no launch MSRP recorded, and the Lisuan card has no launch MSRP recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which card has more memory?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory. The AMD card leads by 33.3%.

Q: Which card has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D records 24.82 TFLOPS FP32, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO records 24.58 TFLOPS FP32. The AMD card leads by 0.98%.

Q: Which card has more shading units?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 6,144 shading units, exactly double the 3,072 shading units on the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D, a 100.0% difference.

Q: Which card supports ray tracing?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D lists 48 ray tracing cores. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not have a ray tracing core count recorded in the database.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 576.0 GB/s over a 256 bit bus, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 432.0 GB/s over a 192 bit bus. The AMD card leads by 33.3%.

Q: Which card has the lower power requirement?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a 150 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 450 W. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP with a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which card supports FP16 at double rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO records FP16 at 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio to FP32. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D records FP16 at 24.82 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D wins on memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and interface features. Its 32 GB frame buffer is 33.3% larger than the Lisuan card's 24 GB, and its 576.0 GB/s bandwidth is 33.3% higher. The AMD card also carries 48 ray tracing cores, which the Lisuan card does not list, and supports PCIe 5.0 x16 compared to PCIe 4.0 x16 on the Lisuan card. The AMD card uses a newer DisplayPort 2.1a output and supports Vulkan 1.4. The AMD card records a 150 W TDP with a 450 W suggested PSU, which is lower than the Lisuan card's 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested PSU. The AMD card is also single-slot and physically smaller at 241 mm by 111 mm by 19 mm. Its FP32 throughput of 24.82 TFLOPS is marginally ahead of the Lisuan card's 24.58 TFLOPS, and its pixel rate and texture rate are each about 1% higher.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins on shading unit count and FP16 throughput. Its 6,144 shading units are double the AMD card's 3,072, and its FP16 performance of 49.15 TFLOPS is 98.0% higher than the AMD card's 24.82 TFLOPS. The double-rate FP16 ratio of 2:1 suggests the Lisuan card is built for workloads that heavily use half-precision math. The Lisuan card also offers four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs, which supports multi-display configurations that the single DisplayPort 2.1a output on the AMD card cannot match. The Lisuan card has the same TMU count of 192 and ROP count of 96 as the AMD card, so its texture and pixel output rates are close despite the shading unit advantage. The 0.98% FP32 gap between the two cards is small enough that the shading unit count difference does not translate into a meaningful FP32 lead for the Lisuan card, which implies the AMD card operates at a higher clock frequency, though the database does not list clocks for the Lisuan card to confirm this. The Lisuan card occupies a dual-slot form factor at 248 mm by 118 mm by 48 mm, which is larger than the AMD card in all three dimensions.

The data supports a clean split. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D suits workloads that need large memory capacity, high memory bandwidth, ray tracing support, and lower power draw. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO suits workloads that need many shading units, double-rate FP16 math, and multiple display outputs. With no benchmark scores recorded for either card, the measured differences in this comparison are limited to the specification-level figures in the database. The near-identical FP32, pixel rate, and texture rate numbers mean the two cards are closely matched in standard single-precision rendering, while the memory and FP16 differences define their separate strengths.