AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D vs Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D against the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. Neither GPU has recorded benchmark scores in the database, and both sit at the 50th percentile among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of zero. This absence of measured data means the comparison must rest entirely on architectural specifications and computed throughput figures.

The raw compute disparity is extreme. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile manages 307.2 GFLOPS. Expressed directly, the AMD part offers roughly 80 times the single-precision throughput. The FP16 comparison tells a similar story: the Radeon AI PRO 9600D sustains 24.82 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, whereas the Intel solution reaches 614.4 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning the AMD card is ahead by a factor of roughly 40 in half-precision work.

Pixel and texture throughput reinforce the same conclusion. The Radeon AI PRO 9600D posts 193.9 GPixel/s and 387.8 GTexel/s. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile records 4.800 GPixel/s and 9.600 GTexel/s. The AMD card therefore exceeds the Intel part by about 40 times in pixel fill and by the same approximate margin in texture fill. These figures indicate that any workload dominated by rasterization or texturing will favor the discrete AMD solution by a wide margin.

Memory bandwidth adds another layer of separation. The Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses 32 GB of GDDR6 memory across a 256-bit bus, yielding 576.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile relies on System Shared memory with bandwidth listed as System Dependent, so no fixed numeric comparison is possible. The presence of dedicated GDDR6 at 576.0 GB/s versus a shared memory architecture makes the AMD card the clear choice for bandwidth-sensitive tasks, though the exact magnitude depends on the host system's memory configuration.

Clock behavior also differs meaningfully. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D runs at a base clock of 1080 MHz, a game clock of 1080 MHz, and a boost clock of 2020 MHz. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile operates at a base of 300 MHz and a boost of 1200 MHz. The AMD boost clock exceeds the Intel boost clock by 820 MHz, and the AMD base clock nearly matches the Intel boost clock. Sustained workloads under the AMD card can rely on a much higher floor.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from entirely different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D uses the Navi 48 chip built on RDNA 4.0 architecture, part of the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi IV Series) generation. It is fabricated by TSMC on a 4 nm process node. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses the Raptor Lake chip with Generation 12.2 architecture, categorized under HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake). Intel manufactures it on a 10 nm process. The process node gap, 4 nm versus 10 nm, gives AMD a substantial density and efficiency advantage in manufacturing.

Transistor counts reflect that advantage. The Radeon AI PRO 9600D packs 53,900 million transistors on a 357 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 151.0 million transistors per square millimeter. The Intel part lists no transistor count, die size, or density in the database, so no direct comparison is possible on those fields. The AMD die size of 357 mm² indicates a large, complex processor designed for standalone installation.

The execution resources differ by an order of magnitude. AMD's Navi 48 includes 3072 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, 96 render output units, and 48 ray tracing cores. Intel's Raptor Lake integrated solution provides 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs, with no ray tracing cores listed. The AMD card thus has 24 times the shading units, 24 times the TMUs, and 24 times the ROPs. Ray tracing is a feature exclusive to the AMD part in this comparison, given the Intel GPU's null RT core count.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is a discrete card with 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit interface, operating at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated graphics processor with System Shared memory, a System Shared bus width, and System Dependent bandwidth. There is no dedicated VRAM on the Intel side; it borrows from the host system's main memory.

Power and physical design also diverge sharply. The AMD card has a TDP of 150 W, uses a single-slot cooler, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 450 W power supply. It measures 241 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 19 mm in width. The Intel part has a 15 W TDP, is an IGP with no slot width, lists no power connectors, no suggested PSU, and no physical dimensions, fitting directly into a laptop or mobile platform. The 135 W TDP difference highlights the intended usage contexts: desktop workstation versus mobile integrated graphics.

Bus interfaces reflect the same split. AMD uses PCIe 5.0 x16, a high-bandwidth external connection. Intel uses a Ring Bus, an internal fabric connecting the GPU to the rest of the processor. Display outputs also differ: the AMD card provides 1x DisplayPort 2.1a, while the Intel solution's outputs are listed as Portable Device Dependent.

API support shows partial overlap. Both GPUs support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. DirectX support differs, with the AMD card at 12 Ultimate (12_2) and the Intel part at 12 (12_1). The AMD card's 12_2 feature level includes advanced features that the Intel 12_1 implementation does not cover.

Release timing places the AMD product later. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile was released on 2023-01-03, while the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D followed on 2025-12-10. Intel lists its successor as Arc Graphics-M, while AMD lists its predecessor as Radeon Pro Vega and no successor. Both remain in Active production status.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D delivers 24.82 TFLOPS, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile delivers 307.2 GFLOPS. The AMD part is roughly 80 times faster in FP32.

Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile support ray tracing?

A: No. The database lists no ray tracing cores for the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D includes 48 ray tracing cores.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has 32 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 576.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses System Shared memory with System Dependent bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D has a 150 W TDP and suggests a 450 W power supply. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a 15 W TDP and lists no power supply requirement.

Q: What process nodes are used?

A: The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is built on a 4 nm process by TSMC. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses a 10 nm process by Intel.

Q: Which API versions are supported?

A: Both support OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: What is the release date of each product?

A: The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile was released on 2023-01-03. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D was released on 2025-12-10.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D | Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 4.0 | Generation 12.2 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 10 nm |

| Foundry | TSMC | Intel |

| Transistors | 53,900 million | Not listed |

| Die Size | 357 mm² | Not listed |

| Transistor Density | 151.0M / mm² | Not listed |

| Base Clock | 1080 MHz | 300 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2020 MHz | 1200 MHz |

| Game Clock | 1080 MHz | Not listed |

| Memory Size | 32 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 576.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 3072 | 128 |

| TMUs | 192 | 8 |

| ROPs | 96 | 4 |

| RT Cores | 48 | Not listed |

| Pixel Rate | 193.9 GPixel/s | 4.800 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 387.8 GTexel/s | 9.600 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 24.82 TFLOPS | 307.2 GFLOPS |

| FP16 | 24.82 TFLOPS (1:1) | 614.4 GFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 150 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Single-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | Not listed |

| Suggested PSU | 450 W | Not listed |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | Ring Bus |

| Display Outputs | 1x DisplayPort 2.1a | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (12_1) |

| Dimensions | 241 mm x 111 mm x 19 mm | Not listed |

| Release Date | 2025-12-10 | 2023-01-03 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Pro Vega | Not listed |

| Successor | Not listed | Arc Graphics-M |

Fields not listed above are identical or unspecified for both parts. Memory clock for the AMD card is 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective speed; the Intel part lists no memory clock. The AMD card's memory clock and effective speed have no counterpart in the Intel entry.

The Verdict

The data separates these two GPUs into different product categories with little overlap. The AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D is a discrete, single-slot workstation card with 32 GB of GDDR6, 3072 shading units, 48 ray tracing cores, and a 150 W TDP. It targets environments where compute throughput, memory bandwidth, and ray tracing matter, and it delivers those in large multiples: 24.82 TFLOPS FP32, 576.0 GB/s bandwidth, and 193.9 GPixel/s fill rate.

The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated graphics solution inside Raptor Lake mobile processors. Its 128 shading units, 15 W TDP, and System Shared memory position it for basic display output and light graphical tasks on portable devices. It has no ray tracing support and no dedicated memory bandwidth figure. Its DirectX 12 (12_1) feature level trails the AMD card's 12 Ultimate (12_2).

The recorded specification sheet points to a simple conclusion. Buyers who need GPU compute, large frame buffers, or ray tracing should choose the AMD Radeon AI PRO 9600D, as it is the only option among the two with those capabilities. Users who require minimal power draw in a mobile form factor and have no need for discrete-class performance will find the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile sufficient for basic operation.

The release dates reinforce the positioning. Intel shipped its integrated GPU in early 2023 and has already named a successor, Arc Graphics-M. AMD shipped its discrete card in late 2025, succeeding the Radeon Pro Vega line. Neither part has benchmark scores in the database, so the verdict rests on the architectural and specification deltas, which are unambiguous. The AMD card leads in every measured compute, memory, and feature category where both have recorded data.