AMD Radeon 880M vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The AMD Radeon 880M and Lisuan Tech LX PRO occupy vastly different positions in the database, and the benchmark data reflects this divergence clearly. The Radeon 880M, an integrated graphics processor for Strix Point mobile platforms, has recorded scores across a wide range of tests. Its average benchmark score sits at 8436, placing it in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores in the database, which limits direct numerical comparison. However, its theoretical specifications and stated percentile of 50 suggest a different performance class entirely.

Looking at the Radeon 880M's individual results, the strongest showing comes in Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 40006. Its OpenCL result follows at 31285, indicating solid compute performance for an integrated part. In PassMark's G3D test, the 880M records 7615, while the G2D test yields 969. The DirectX legacy tests show more modest numbers: 97 in DirectX 9, 73 in DirectX 11, and 32 in DirectX 12. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test produces a score of 535, and PassMark GPU Compute lands at 3719.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO enters the comparison with zero recorded benchmark results. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and its nearest rivals list is empty. This does not mean the hardware is non-functional; rather, the database lacks test data for this particular unit. What the database does provide is a percentile rank of 50, which sits above the Radeon 880M's 43rd percentile. That seven-point gap in percentile, combined with the LX PRO's dedicated hardware configuration, indicates the Lisuan part is expected to outperform the AMD IGP in raw graphics workloads, even without direct score comparisons.

The nearest rivals for the Radeon 880M give context to its standing. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX averages 8427, which is just 0.1% below the 880M's average. The NVIDIA GeForce MX330 averages 8458, putting it 0.3% above. The AMD Radeon HD 8870M matches that 0.3% margin with an average of 8462. The AMD Radeon R9 M375X trails by 1.3% with an average of 8325. These deltas show the 880M clustering tightly with older discrete mobile GPUs, a notable achievement for an integrated solution but far from the performance envelope the LX PRO's specifications imply.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 880M wins in mobility and efficiency. Its 15 W TDP makes it suitable for thin-and-light laptops, and its IGP slot width means no dedicated cooling or power delivery is required. The database shows it as an active production part released in 2024, built for the Strix Point generation. Its benchmark scores, while modest, are consistent across API generations, and it supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. For portable devices where battery life and thermal limits dominate, the 880M is the clear choice.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw capability and memory bandwidth. Its GDDR6 memory totals 24 GB across a 192-bit bus, delivering 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 880M, by contrast, uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as "System Dependent," meaning its performance scales with the host platform's memory configuration. The LX PRO's 6144 shading units dwarf the 880M's 768, and its 192 texture mapping units versus 48 give it a massive fill-rate advantage. The pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s on the LX PRO is more than four times the 880M's 46.40 GPixel/s. In texture throughput, the LX PRO's 384.0 GTexel/s more than doubles the 880M's 139.2 GTexel/s.

The compute numbers reinforce this split. The LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the 880M manages 4.454 TFLOPS. In FP16, the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, whereas the 880M offers 4.454 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO also supports a 225 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, and a 16-pin power connector, all of which point to a desktop-oriented, performance-first design. The 880M uses no external power connectors and relies entirely on the host system.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural lineages. The AMD Radeon 880M uses the RDNA 3.5 architecture, built on TSMC's 4 nm process node. Its chip is codenamed Strix Point, and it belongs to the Navi III IGP generation. The die size measures 233 mm² with 34,000 million transistors, yielding a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The base clock runs at 400 MHz, boosting to 2900 MHz. It includes 12 ray tracing cores, a feature the Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not list.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses an architecture identified as "TrueGPU," built on TSMC's 6 nm process node. Its chip is designated 7G105, part of the 7G100 generation. The database lists transistor count and die size as unknown, so density cannot be calculated. The LX PRO operates with a memory clock of 2250 MHz, or 18 Gbps effective, and does not list base or boost clock speeds. It also does not list ray tracing cores or tensor cores.

The memory architecture differs fundamentally. The 880M shares system memory, with no dedicated VRAM, bus width, or bandwidth figures, only "System Shared" and "System Dependent." The LX PRO uses 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 on a 192-bit interface with a fixed 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. This is a critical architectural divergence: integrated graphics depend on system RAM bandwidth, while the LX PRO has its own high-speed memory pool.

API support shows partial overlap. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 880M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3. The LX PRO adds display outputs with four DisplayPort 1.4a connectors, while the 880M's outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," reflecting its mobile IGP nature.

Specification Differences

The specification tables for the two products differ across nearly every measurable field.

Process node: The 880M uses 4 nm TSMC; the LX PRO uses 6 nm TSMC.

Memory: The 880M has system-shared memory with no dedicated size, type, bus width, or bandwidth. The LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Shading units: The 880M has 768; the LX PRO has 6144.

Texture mapping units: The 880M has 48; the LX PRO has 192.

Render output units: The 880M has 16; the LX PRO has 96.

Ray tracing cores: The 880M lists 12; the LX PRO lists none.

Pixel rate: The 880M achieves 46.40 GPixel/s; the LX PRO achieves 192.0 GPixel/s.

Texture rate: The 880M achieves 139.2 GTexel/s; the LX PRO achieves 384.0 GTexel/s.

FP32 performance: The 880M delivers 4.454 TFLOPS; the LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

FP16 performance: The 880M delivers 4.454 TFLOPS (1:1); the LX PRO delivers 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1).

TDP: The 880M draws 15 W; the LX PRO draws 225 W.

Slot width: The 880M is an IGP; the LX PRO is dual-slot.

Power connectors: The 880M uses none; the LX PRO uses one 16-pin connector.

Suggested PSU: The 880M lists none; the LX PRO lists 550 W.

Bus interface: The 880M uses PCIe 4.0 x8; the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Dimensions: The 880M has no listed length, height, or width. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

Release date: The 880M released in 2024; the LX PRO releases in 2026.

Vulkan version: The 880M supports 1.4; the LX PRO supports 1.3.

Transistors and die size: The 880M lists 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die. The LX PRO lists both as unknown.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, compared to the AMD Radeon 880M's 4.454 TFLOPS.

Q: Do both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate?

A: Yes, both the AMD Radeon 880M and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). Both also support OpenGL 4.6, but they differ in Vulkan support: the 880M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M uses system-shared memory with a "System Dependent" bandwidth and no dedicated VRAM. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: How do their power requirements compare?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M has a 15 W TDP and uses no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, uses a single 16-pin power connector, and requires a suggested PSU of 550 W.

Q: Which GPU has a higher percentile ranking in the database?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO sits at the 50th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon 880M sits at the 43rd percentile. However, the LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores, whereas the 880M has an average benchmark score of 8436.

Q: What are the physical dimensions of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 880M is an IGP with no listed dimensions. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a dual-slot card measuring 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.