AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison
AMD Radeon 880M
GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER
Where Each One Wins
The recorded benchmark data splits these two GPUs into entirely different performance classes. The AMD Radeon 880M wins zero benchmarks in the database, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the only head-to-head test available. That sole comparison, the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, shows the NVIDIA part scoring 6269.5 points against the AMD part's 535 points, a delta of -91.5% for the AMD side.
The AMD Radeon 880M sits in the 43rd percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database, with an average benchmark score of 8436 across ten tests. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX at 8427 (0.1% delta), the NVIDIA GeForce MX330 at 8458 (-0.3%), the AMD Radeon HD 8870M at 8462 (-0.3%), and the AMD Radeon R9 M375X at 8325 (1.3%). These are all older discrete mobile parts, which positions the 880M as a modern integrated solution that lands in the same scoring neighborhood as last-generation entry-level dedicated GPUs.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in the 36th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6270 based on its single recorded test. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 at 6270 (0% delta), the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 (-0.2%), the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8%), and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 (-0.9%). The percentile ranking appears low relative to the raw score because the database includes many professional and workstation parts with higher scores, but the delta against its nearest rivals shows it is effectively tied with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102.
The use-case split is stark. The 880M is an integrated graphics processor designed for portable devices, drawing 15 W and using system-shared memory. It delivers playable performance for lightweight workloads and older titles, as indicated by its PassMark DirectX 9 score of 97 and DirectX 11 score of 73. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot, 350 W add-in board with 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory and a 256-bit bus, built for high-end desktop gaming and compute tasks. The data shows no overlap in their intended usage scenarios.
Architecture Differences
The two chips come from different foundries, different node processes, and fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Radeon 880M uses the Strix Point chip built on TSMC's 4 nm process, with an RDNA 3.5 architecture. It packs 34,000 million transistors into a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9 million per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip on TSMC's 5 nm process, with a Blackwell 2.0 architecture. It contains 45,600 million transistors across a 378 mm² die, giving a density of 120.6 million per mm².
The compute resources differ by an order of magnitude. The 880M has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, 16 ROPs, and 12 ray tracing cores. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, 70 RT cores, and 280 tensor cores. The NVIDIA part also has dedicated tensor cores for AI workloads, while the AMD part lists none. The FP32 throughput tells the same story: 4.454 TFLOPS for the AMD IGP versus 43.94 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA GPU, exactly a 1:1 ratio for FP16 in both cases.
Clock speeds show different strategies. The 880M runs at a 400 MHz base clock and boosts to 2900 MHz, a wide range that reflects power management in mobile devices. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at a 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, a much narrower range typical of a desktop card operating near its thermal ceiling. Memory configurations are completely different: the 880M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 at 1750 MHz (28 Gbps effective) on a 256-bit bus, delivering 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth.
The pixel and texture rates confirm the gap. The 880M outputs 46.40 GPixel/s and 139.2 GTexel/s. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER outputs 235.4 GPixel/s and 686.6 GTexel/s. The NVIDIA card supports PCIe 5.0 x16, while the AMD IGP uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical.
Physical specifications differ as expected. The 880M is an IGP with no slot width, no power connectors, and portable-device-dependent display outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width, with a single 16-pin power connector and outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. The TDP figures are 15 W for the AMD part versus 350 W for the NVIDIA part.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The only directly comparable benchmark in the database is 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, while the AMD Radeon 880M scores 535. That is a delta of -91.5% for the AMD part, meaning the NVIDIA card delivers roughly 11.7 times the raw score. This is not a close contest by any measure.
The 880M's individual benchmark results paint a fuller picture of its capabilities. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 31285, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 40006. PassMark results show 31 in DirectX 10, 73 in DirectX 11, 32 in DirectX 12, 97 in DirectX 9, 969 in G2D, 7615 in G3D, and 3719 in GPU compute. The average across all tests is 8436, with a 43rd percentile ranking.
The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has only one recorded benchmark, the Steel Nomad test, which gives it an average of 6270 and a 36th percentile ranking. Its nearest rival, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, matches its score exactly with a 0% delta, indicating that the 5070 Ti SUPER's performance is statistically indistinguishable from that prior-generation part in the database's measurements. The other nearest rivals are far older and weaker parts, but their deltas are small: the Quadro K620 is -0.2% behind, the FirePro W600 is 0.8% ahead, and the Radeon R7 M350 is -0.9% behind. These deltas suggest the average score is heavily influenced by the single Steel Nomad result.
The 880M's nearest rivals tell a different story. The GTX 675MX is 0.1% ahead, the MX330 is 0.3% ahead, the HD 8870M is 0.3% ahead, and the R9 M375X is 1.3% behind. These are all sub-1.5% deltas, meaning the 880M lands squarely in a cluster of older discrete mobile GPUs. Its 43rd percentile ranking reflects this mid-pack positioning relative to the entire database.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 performance?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32, while the AMD Radeon 880M delivers 4.454 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA part has roughly ten times the raw compute throughput.
Q: How much memory bandwidth does each GPU have?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth from its 16 GB GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus. The 880M uses system-shared memory with bandwidth labeled as system dependent, so no fixed figure applies.
Q: What is the transistor count and die size difference?
A: The 880M has 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die at 4 nm. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die at 5 nm. The AMD part has higher transistor density at 145.9M per mm² versus 120.6M per mm² for NVIDIA.
Q: How do their 3DMark Steel Nomad scores compare?
A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, and the 880M scores 535. The delta is -91.5% for the AMD part, making the NVIDIA card the clear winner in that test.
Q: What are the power requirements?
A: The 880M has a TDP of 15 W and uses no power connectors. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector.
Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?
A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), which includes ray tracing. The 880M has 12 RT cores, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 70 RT cores.
The Verdict
The data indicates two products with no meaningful overlap in performance or purpose. The AMD Radeon 880M is an integrated GPU for portable devices, using 15 W, sharing system memory, and scoring 535 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. Its average benchmark score of 8436 places it alongside older discrete mobile GPUs like the GTX 675MX and MX330, with deltas under 1.5%. It is suitable for systems where power draw and integration matter more than raw graphics throughput.
The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a desktop add-in board with a 350 W TDP, 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory, and a 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5. Its average score of 6270 ties exactly with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102, with a 0% delta, indicating comparable performance in the database's measurements. The 5070 Ti SUPER carries a launch MSRP of 749 USD.
Benchmark results indicate that anyone selecting between these two parts is choosing between a low-power integrated solution and a high-end discrete GPU. The 880M wins no head-to-head tests and falls 91.5% behind in the only shared benchmark. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins that test decisively and offers 8960 shading units, 280 TMUs, 96 ROPs, and 70 RT cores versus the 880M's 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 12 RT cores. The 880M is the appropriate choice for a compact, power-efficient mobile system. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the appropriate choice for a desktop build requiring maximum recorded performance.