AMD Radeon 880M vs Intel UHD Graphics 750 Comparison
AMD Radeon 880M
UHD Graphics 750
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 880M vs Intel UHD Graphics 750
The Verdict
The AMD Radeon 880M is the clear performance leader in this matchup. Benchmark results show it wins both head-to-head tests decisively, with a 364% advantage in Geekbench OpenCL and a 391.6% advantage in Geekbench Vulkan over the Intel UHD Graphics 750. The 880M also holds a higher overall average benchmark score of 8436 compared to 7441 for the Intel part, and it sits at the 43rd percentile of all GPUs versus the 40th percentile for Intel.
For builders choosing between these two, the decision is straightforward from the data. The AMD Radeon 880M is the pick for anyone who needs integrated graphics that can handle modern workloads, especially compute-heavy tasks and Vulkan-based applications. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 remains a functional option for basic display output and light 2D workloads, but its performance ceiling is far lower. The 880M is production status Active, while the Intel part is End-of-life, which means the AMD solution is the forward-looking choice for new builds. Intel UHD Graphics 750 is only suitable for systems where the CPU platform itself (Rocket Lake) is already chosen, and even then the performance gap to the AMD IGP is enormous.
Architecture Differences
The AMD Radeon "Strix Point die, built on TSMC 4 nm process, uses RDNA 3.5 architecture. It packs 34,000 million transistors on a 233 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 145.9M per mm². The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 uses Rocket Lake silicon on Intel 14 nm+++ process, using Generation 12.1 architecture. Its transistor count and die size are not recorded in the database. The Intel part supports DirectX 12 (12_1), which is a lower feature level than the AMD part's DirectX 12 Ultimate.
The 880M comes from Navi III IGP family, while the AMD part lists its predecessor. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 has no recorded predecessor in the database.
Feature differences are stark: the AMD side has 12 ray tracing cores, while the Intel side has no RT cores at all. The AMD part processes 768 shading units, while the Intel part has 256 shading units, a 3x difference in raw compute resources. The AMD side is at 1:1 FP16 rate, while the Intel side runs FP16 at 2:1 rate. The AMD chip is PCIe 4.0 x8, the Intel chip is Ring Bus interface on the Intel part.
Process node difference is large: 4 nm versus 14 nm+++. The AMD part is manufactured by TSMC, the Intel part by Intel. The AMD chip has a boost clock of 2900 MHz, the Intel chip has a boost of 1300 MHz. The AMD part has a transistor count of 34,000 million, the Intel part lacks a recorded transistor count in the database. The AMD part is 233 mm², the Intel part lacks a die size in the database.
The AMD Radeon 880M, AMD manufacturer. The Intel UHD Graphics 750 is made by Intel. The AMD part is "Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)" and the Intel part is HD Graphics "Rocket Lake" generation. The AMD part is a 16 ROPs processor, the Intel part has 8 ROPs processor, the AMD part has 48 TMUs texture, the Intel part has 16 TMUs.
Where Each One Wins
From the recorded data, the AMD Radeon 880M wins in every single overlapping benchmark test. The two Geekbench OpenCL tests are the only ones where both GPUs have scores in the database, and the AMD part wins by huge margins. The AMD part has average benchmark score, 8436 average, 7615 Passmark G3D. The AMD part has Passmark DirectX 11 score of 73, Passmark DirectX 12 score 32, Passmark DirectX 9 score 97, Passmark G2D score 969, Passmark GPU compute score 3719, and Passmark DirectX 10 score 31. The AMD part scores 31, the Intel part has no Passmark scores recorded.
The Intel UHD Graphics 750 wins zero head-to-head tests. Its best score is Geekbench Vulkan score 8138, Geekbench OpenCL score 6743. The AMD part's Geekbench OpenCL score is 31285, Geekbench Vulkan score 40006. The Intel part has no Passmark DirectX 9, DirectX 10, DirectX 12 score in the database.
The data shows that the AMD Radeon 880M wins in every single overlapping benchmark test, a 391.6% delta in Geekbench Vulkan and a 364% delta in Geekbench OpenCL. The AMD part has a higher average benchmark score, 8436 average, versus 7441 average for the Intel part. The AMD part's percentile ranking is 43rd percentile versus 40th percentile.
Use-case split is obvious: for Vulkan and OpenCL workloads, the AMD part is the one to pick. The Intel part's only Vulkan score is 8138 Geekbench Vulkan score, the AMD part has 40006 Geekbench Vulkan score. The AMD part has a 391.6% delta in Geekbench Vulkan score delta. The AMD part wins in Geekbench OpenCL score, 31285 Geekbench OpenCL score, delta of 364%. The Intel part has Geekbench OpenCL score 6743, delta of 364%.
For Vulkan compute on the Intel part, the 8138 score is lower than the AMD part's 40006 score. The AMD part wins DirectX 12 Ultimate support 12_2; Intel part has DirectX 12 12_1 only. The AMD part wins in Vulkan 1.4 API, and OpenGL 4.6 API. The AMD part has 12 RT cores, Intel part has no RT cores, the AMD part has no RT cores recorded in the database. The AMD part has a 4 nm process, Intel part has 14 nm+++ process.
FAQ
**Q: How much faster is the AMD Radeon 880M in Geekbench OpenCL than Intel UHD Graphics 750?
A: The AMD Radeon 880M scores 31285 in Geekbench OpenCL, Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 6743. The AMD part wins by 364%.
**Q: Which GPU has the higher Geekbench Vulkan score?
A: AMD Radeon 880M scores 40006 in Geekbench Vulkan, Intel UHD Graphics 750 scores 8138, AMD part wins by 391.6% delta.
**Q: What is the average benchmark score difference between the two?
A: AMD Radeon 880M average score is 8436, Intel UHD Graphics 750 average score is 7441, a difference of 995 points.
**Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing cores?
A: The AMD Radeon 880M includes 12 ray tracing cores, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 has no ray tracing cores recorded in the database.
**Q: What is the DirectX support difference?
A: The AMD Radeon 880M supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while Intel UHD Graphics 750 supports DirectX 12 (12_1). The AMD part has the higher feature level.
**Q: What is the production status of each GPU?
A: The AMD Radeon 880M is currently in Active production status, while the Intel UHD Graphics 750 is End-of-life.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The head-to-head data features two benchmarks, and the AMD Radeon 880M wins both by massive margins. In Geekbench OpenCL, the AMD part scores 31285 against Intel's 6743. That is a 364% advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, the AMD part scores 40006 against Intel's 8138. That is a 391.6% advantage.
The Geekbench Vulkan result is the largest single win for AMD. The 40006 score versus 8138 shows the 880M is roughly five times the performance of the Intel part in Vulkan workloads. The Geekbench OpenCL result tells a similar story at 31285 versus 6743. Both tests favor the AMD part so decisively that no application split exists where the Intel part would be competitive.
Looking at the broader benchmark suite, the AMD part's Geekbench OpenCL score of 31285 sits far above its own average, while the Intel part's 6743 Geekbench OpenCL score is below its average of 7441. The AMD part's Geekbench Vulkan score of 40006 is its highest recorded benchmark in the database. The Intel part's Geekbench Vulkan score of 8138 is its highest recorded benchmark in the database.
The AMD part's average benchmark score of 8436 is 13.4% higher than the Intel part's 7441. The AMD part's Passmark G3D score is 7615, which is higher than the Intel part's average score of 7441. The AMD part's Passmark GPU compute score is 3719. The AMD part's Passmark G2D score is 969.
The AMD part's percentile ranking of 43rd percentile vs. the Intel part's 40th percentile ranking means the AMD part ranks in the top 43rd percentile of all GPUs, Intel part ranks at 40th percentile. That puts the Intel part in the 40th percentile exactly.
The AMD part's nearest rival list includes NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX, which has an average score of 8427, delta 0.1% higher than AMD's 8427. The AMD part's average score of 8436 is 0.1% higher than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX's 8427 score. The AMD part's average score of 8436 is 0.1% higher than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 675MX score of 8427.
The AMD part's average score 8436 is 0.3% higher than NVIDIA GeForce MX330 score 8458, AMD Radeon HD 8870M score 8462, AMD Radeon R9 M375X score 8325, delta 1.3% higher than R9 M375X score 8325. The AMD part's average score 8436 is 1.3% higher than AMD Radeon R9 M375X score 8325 score 8325.
The Intel part's average score, 7441, 0.1% lower than AMD Radeon HD 8850M score 7447, delta -0.1% lower than HD 8850M score 7447. The Intel part's average score 7441, 0.2% higher than AMD Radeon R7 350 score 7425, 0.4% lower than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 score 7472, 1.4% lower than Intel Arc A310 score 7550, delta -1.4% lower than Arc A310 score 7550.
Specification Differences, AMD Radeon 880M vs Intel UHD Graphics 750.
The process node is 4 nm on the AMD part, 14 nm+++ on the Intel part. AMD's chip is "Strix Point" Rocket Lake, Intel chip is Rocket Lake. AMD architecture is RDNA 3. RDNA 3.5 architecture, Intel architecture is Generation 12.1 architecture. The AMD part has 34,000 million transistors, Intel part lacks transistor count. The AMD part has 233 mm² die size, Intel part lacks die size. The AMD part has 145.9M/mm² density, Intel part lacks density.
Clocks base 400 MHz on AMD part, 300 MHz on Intel part. AMD boost 2900 MHz, Intel boost 1300 MHz. The AMD part has memory system shared, Intel part has system shared memory type. The AMD part has System Shared bus width, Intel part has System Shared bus width. Bandwidth is System Dependent on both.
Shading units 768 on AMD part, 256 Intel part. TMUs 48, Intel 16. ROPs 16 AMD, Intel 8 ROPs. 12 RT cores on AMD part. Pixel rate 46.46 GPixel/s on AMD part, 10.40 GPixel/s on Intel part. Texture rate 139.2 GTexel/s, 20.80 GTexel/s on Intel part. FP32 4.454 TFLOPS on AMD part, 665.6 GFLOPS on Intel part, FP16 4.454 TFLOPS on Intel part 1:1, Intel part 1,331.2 GFLOPS Intel part (2:1:1).
TDP 15 W on both parts. Slot width IGP both. Power connectors None on AMD part, null Intel part. Bus interface PCIe 4.0 x8 AMD part. Ring Bus Intel part. Display outputs portable device dependent display outputs on AMD, motherboard dependent on Intel part. DirectX 12 Ultimate 12_2 AMD, DirectX 12 12_1 Intel. OpenGL 4.6 both, Vulkan 1.4 both. Production status Active AMD part, End-of-life Intel part. Release date 2024-07-14T17:00:00.000Z AMD part, 2021-03-29T17:00:00.000Z Intel part. Predecessor Navi IGP AMD part predecessor, Intel part no predecessor. Successor null both. Launch MSRP null both. Percentile 43rd AMD, 40th Intel. Avg score 8436 AMD part, 7441 Intel part. Wins 2 AMD part wins 0 Intel part wins 0.