AMD Radeon 840M vs NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data contains no direct head-to-head benchmark entries for the AMD Radeon 840M against the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell. However, the database provides a complete benchmark profile for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, while the Radeon 840M has no benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and a percentile ranking of 50. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell holds a percentile rank of 70, placing it above the majority of all GPUs tracked in the database.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell delivers an average benchmark score of 25,269. Its nearest rivals in the database are the AMD Radeon RX 6700M at 25,633 (1.4% ahead of the RTX PRO 2000), the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 at 25,726 (1.8% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile at 25,740 (1.8% ahead), and the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile at 24,763 (2% behind). This places the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell in a tight competitive band where the largest recorded gap to any nearby rival is only 2%.

In individual benchmark tests, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell shows its strongest result in Geekbench Vulkan with a score of 113,865, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 106,087. The Passmark G3D score reaches 20,049, and the Passmark GPU Compute score is 8,396. Legacy DirectX results are lower: Passmark DirectX 9 scores 241, DirectX 11 scores 174, DirectX 10 scores 122, and DirectX 12 scores 80. The Passmark G2D score is 1,303. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score is 2,374.5.

Because the Radeon 840M has no recorded benchmark scores, the data cannot confirm any win for the AMD part in head-to-head testing. The comparison is therefore one-sided: the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has measurable performance data across every recorded test, while the Radeon 840M has none. The percentile gap (50 versus 70) suggests the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell sits in a higher performance bracket, but the absence of direct scores for the Radeon 840M prevents a precise delta calculation.

The Verdict

The data indicates a clear split in intended roles rather than a direct performance contest. The Radeon 840M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) built on the Krackan Point chip with a 15 W TDP, designed for portable devices. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a dual-slot discrete workstation GPU with a 70 W TDP, 16 GB of GDDR7 memory, and a 128-bit memory bus delivering 288.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

For users requiring measurable compute performance, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the only option with recorded benchmark results. Its average score of 25,269 and 70th percentile ranking place it in the upper half of all GPUs in the database. The Radeon 840M, with zero recorded benchmark scores and a 50th percentile, cannot be positioned against the RTX PRO 2000 on performance grounds.

For systems where power draw and physical footprint matter, the Radeon 840M uses 15 W, requires no power connectors, and occupies no expansion slot as an IGP. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell draws 70 W, requires a 250 W suggested power supply, and occupies a dual-slot footprint with dimensions of 167 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm. The Radeon 840M also uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system dependent, whereas the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has dedicated 16 GB of GDDR7.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell also provides four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, while the Radeon 840M's display outputs are portable device dependent. The verdict from the data: the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell serves workloads requiring verified GPU compute and dedicated memory, while the Radeon 840M serves low-power integrated scenarios where dedicated graphics hardware is not an option.

FAQ

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 840M have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No. The database lists no benchmarks for the Radeon 840M, its average benchmark score is 0, and its percentile rank is 50.

Q: What is the NVIDIA RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's average benchmark score and percentile?

A: The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has an average benchmark score of 25,269 and a percentile rank of 70 among all GPUs in the database.

Q: How does the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell compare to its nearest rivals?

A: It trails the AMD Radeon RX 6700M by 1.4%, the AMD Radeon Pro W5700 by 1.8%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile by 1.8%, while leading the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile by 2%.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each GPU?

A: The Radeon 840M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The Radeon 840M has a 15 W TDP and uses no power connectors. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a 70 W TDP, uses no power connectors, and lists a 250 W suggested power supply.

Q: Which API versions do both GPUs support?

A: Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every measured specification. The Radeon 840M uses a 4 nm process node, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses a 5 nm node, both from TSMC. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 21,900 million transistors on a 181 mm² die with a transistor density of 121.0 million per mm²; the Radeon 840M's transistor count and die size are unknown.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The Radeon 840M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2900 MHz. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has a base clock of 982 MHz and a boost clock of 1957 MHz, with memory clocked at 1125 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 4,352 shading units, 136 texture mapping units, 48 ROPs, 34 ray tracing cores, and 136 tensor cores. The Radeon 840M has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 4 ray tracing cores, with no tensor core data recorded.

Pixel and texture rates favor the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell: 93.94 GPixel/s versus 23.20 GPixel/s, and 266.2 GTexel/s versus 46.40 GTexel/s. Floating point performance shows 17.03 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) for the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell, compared to 1,484.8 GFLOPS FP32 and FP16 (1:1) for the Radeon 840M.

The bus interface differs: the Radeon 840M uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses PCIe 5.0 x8. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is a dual-slot card measuring 167 mm by 69 mm by 20 mm with four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b outputs. The Radeon 840M is an IGP with no slot width and portable device dependent display outputs.

Architecture Differences

The Radeon 840M is built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile, using the Krackan Point chip. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0 architecture, part of the Blackwell PRO W (x000) generation, built on the GB206 chip. The Radeon 840M's predecessor is listed as Navi II IGP; the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's predecessor is Workstation Ada.

The Radeon 840M was released on 2025-02-28, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell was released on 2025-08-10. Both are listed as Active in production status.

Architectural resources differ sharply. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 4,352 shading units, 136 TMUs, 48 ROPs, 34 ray tracing cores, and 136 tensor cores. The Radeon 840M has 256 shading units, 16 TMUs, 8 ROPs, and 4 ray tracing cores, with no tensor core data recorded. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's tensor core count indicates dedicated AI acceleration hardware, a feature absent from the recorded Radeon 840M data.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's memory subsystem uses dedicated 16 GB GDDR7 with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 128-bit bus. The Radeon 840M relies entirely on system shared memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent. This is a fundamental architectural difference: the discrete GPU has its own high-speed memory pool, while the IGP borrows from system memory.

Both GPUs support identical API levels: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The process node difference (4 nm for AMD, 5 nm for NVIDIA) and die size data (181 mm² for NVIDIA, unknown for AMD) complete the architectural picture.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell wins in every category with recorded performance data. Its 17.03 TFLOPS FP32 output is more than an order of magnitude above the Radeon 840M's 1,484.8 GFLOPS. Its pixel rate of 93.94 GPixel/s and texture rate of 266.2 GTexel/s dwarf the Radeon 840M's 23.20 GPixel/s and 46.40 GTexel/s. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell also provides dedicated 16 GB GDDR7 memory with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth, versus system shared memory for the Radeon 840M.

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 25,269 confirm its position as a measurable performer in the database. Its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6700M (1.4% ahead), AMD Radeon Pro W5700 (1.8% ahead), and NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080 Ti Mobile (1.8% ahead), with the NVIDIA RTX A5000 Mobile 2% behind. This places the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell in a competitive workstation and mobile GPU segment.

The Radeon 840M wins in power efficiency and physical integration. Its 15 W TDP is less than a quarter of the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70 W TDP. As an IGP, it requires no expansion slot, no power connectors, and no suggested power supply rating. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell requires a dual-slot footprint and a 250 W suggested power supply. The Radeon 840M's display outputs are portable device dependent, meaning it integrates into mobile systems without external display cabling requirements.

The Radeon 840M also holds a release date advantage, launching 2025-02-28 versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 2025-08-10. However, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers four mini-DisplayPort 2.1b outputs, a feature set suited to multi-display workstation setups.

For compute-heavy workloads, professional graphics, and tasks requiring dedicated VRAM, the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the clear choice from the data. For low-power integrated systems where the GPU must share system memory and no expansion slot is available, the Radeon 840M is the applicable part. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has tensor cores for AI workloads; the Radeon 840M has no recorded tensor core data. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell also has 34 ray tracing cores versus 4 on the Radeon 840M, giving it a substantial advantage in ray-traced rendering workloads.