AMD Radeon 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 820M

CORE STATE Krackan Point 2
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2800 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.5
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2025
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

CORE STATE AD104
VRAM 12 GB
CLOCK SPEED 2475 MHz
TDP 220 W
BUS WIDTH 192 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ada Lovelace
nm
PROCESS 5 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
4,627
geekbench_opencl
N/A
172,795
geekbench_vulkan
N/A
205,624
passmark_directx_10
N/A
167
passmark_directx_11
N/A
273
passmark_directx_12
N/A
110
passmark_directx_9
N/A
344
passmark_g2d
N/A
1,184
passmark_g3d
N/A
29,995
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
17,108

Analysis: AMD Radeon 820M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a fundamental performance gap between these two graphics solutions. The AMD Radeon 820M is an integrated graphics processor with 128 shading units, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a discrete add-in card with 7,168 shading units. The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head comparison entries, but the available individual benchmark results and architectural specifications establish a clear hierarchy.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER delivers an average benchmark score of 43,223 across all recorded tests. This places it in the 83rd percentile of all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA Quadro M6000 24 GB with an average score of 43,262, a delta of -0.1%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5050 Mobile with an average score of 43,268, also a delta of -0.1%. The NVIDIA Quadro M6000 scores 43,301, a delta of -0.2%, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile scores 43,667, a delta of -1%. The RTX 4070 SUPER sits within 1% of these high-end competitors, confirming its position near the top of the performance distribution.

The AMD Radeon 820M has no recorded benchmark scores in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it holds a 50th percentile position among all GPUs. The absence of measured results means the database cannot provide a direct numerical comparison of application performance. However, the specification differences provide a basis for analysis.

The raw compute figures show the scale of the divide. The RTX 4070 SUPER produces 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Radeon 820M produces 716.8 GFLOPS. That is a difference of roughly 49.5 times in raw floating-point throughput. The pixel throughput tells a similar story: the RTX 4070 SUPER renders 198.0 GPixel/s versus 11.20 GPixel/s for the 820M, a factor of approximately 17.7. Texture fill rates differ even more sharply, with the RTX 4070 SUPER at 554.4 GTexel/s compared to 22.40 GTexel/s for the 820M, a factor of about 24.8.

The RTX 4070 SUPER also carries dedicated ray tracing hardware in the form of 56 RT cores and 224 tensor cores. The Radeon 820M includes 2 RT cores but no tensor cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER supports 12 GB of GDDR6X memory across a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 820M uses system-shared memory, with bandwidth dependent on the host system, a figure the database cannot quantify.

Memory performance is one of the largest practical separators. The RTX 4070 SUPER's 504.2 GB/s dedicated bandwidth is a discrete design advantage. The 820M's memory bandwidth is labeled "System Dependent" in the database, meaning it shares the host's memory subsystem and is subject to the platform's capabilities. This affects texture streaming, frame buffer access, and overall responsiveness in memory-intensive workloads.

The Verdict

The data indicates two products aimed at entirely different segments. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot, 220 W discrete graphics card with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 550 W. It measures 267 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. Its launch MSRP was 599 USD. The AMD Radeon 820M is an integrated graphics processor with a 15 W TDP, no power connectors, and no physical dimensions listed, as it is built into the host processor.

The RTX 4070 SUPER produces more than 49 times the FP32 compute of the 820M, 17.7 times the pixel rate, and 24.8 times the texture rate. It has 56 times the shading units, 28 times the texture mapping units, and 20 times the raster operation units. These ratios, drawn directly from the database, describe a product class difference rather than a generational difference.

The RTX 4070 SUPER was released on 2024-01-16 and is marked as End-of-life in production status, with the GeForce 50 as its successor. The Radeon 820M was released on 2025-02-28, is marked as Active, and belongs to the Krackan Point 2 chip family with RDNA 3.5 architecture. The RTX 4070 SUPER is based on the AD104 chip with Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm process from TSMC. The Radeon 820M uses a 4 nm process from TSMC.

For users selecting between these two parts, the database shows that the Radeon 820M is a low-power integrated solution with no recorded performance benchmarks and a 50th percentile standing. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a high-performance discrete card with recorded scores in ten separate benchmarks and an 83rd percentile standing. No benchmark data exists to suggest the 820M can approach the RTX 4070 SUPER in any measured workload.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER wins every category where the database contains measurable data. Its recorded benchmarks include 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 with a score of 4,627, Geekbench OpenCL with 172,795, Geekbench Vulkan with 205,624, Passmark DirectX 10 with 167, Passmark DirectX 11 with 273, Passmark DirectX 12 with 110, Passmark DirectX 9 with 344, Passmark G2D with 1,184, Passmark G3D with 29,995, and Passmark GPU Compute with 17,108. Its average benchmark score of 43,223 reflects consistent high-end performance across these synthetic tests.

The AMD Radeon 820M has no recorded benchmarks. Its advantage lies in power consumption and physical integration. The database lists its TDP at 15 W, compared to 220 W for the RTX 4070 SUPER. It requires no power connectors, no expansion slot beyond the integrated processor socket, and no dedicated cooling solution beyond what the host system provides. Its bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RTX 4070 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The 820M's display outputs are listed as "Portable Device Dependent," indicating it is designed for mobile and compact systems where the RTX 4070 SUPER's 267 mm length and dual-slot footprint would not fit.

The RTX 4070 SUPER supports 12 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory. The 820M shares system memory, with size, type, and bus width all listed as "System Shared." For workloads that depend on dedicated frame buffer capacity, such as high-resolution rendering or large texture sets, the RTX 4070 SUPER has a structural advantage that the database quantifies through its 504.2 GB/s bandwidth figure.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER has an average benchmark score of 43,223. The AMD Radeon 820M has an average benchmark score of 0, with no recorded benchmark entries.

Q: What is the FP32 compute difference between the two?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER delivers 35.48 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Radeon 820M delivers 716.8 GFLOPS.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 12 GB of GDDR6X memory on a 192-bit bus. The Radeon 820M uses system-shared memory, with no dedicated capacity specified.

Q: What are the power requirements?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has a 220 W TDP, uses a 1x 16-pin power connector, and has a suggested PSU of 550 W. The Radeon 820M has a 15 W TDP and uses no power connectors.

Q: What is the memory bandwidth of each GPU?

A: The RTX 4070 SUPER has 504.2 GB/s of bandwidth. The Radeon 820M's bandwidth is listed as "System Dependent."

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing hardware?

A: Both have RT cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 56 RT cores, while the Radeon 820M has 2 RT cores.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural families. The AMD Radeon 820M uses RDNA 3.5 architecture and belongs to the Navi III IGP generation, specifically the Strix Point Mobile line. It is built on the Krackan Point 2 chip using a 4 nm process from TSMC. Its predecessor is listed as Navi II IGP. The architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER uses Ada Lovelace architecture from the GeForce 40 generation. It is built on the AD104 chip using a 5 nm process from TSMC. The database lists 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die, with a transistor density of 121.8M per mm². Its predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. It supports the same API set as the 820M: DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

The compute resources differ drastically. The Radeon 820M has 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, 4 raster operation units, and 2 RT cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER has 7,168 shading units, 224 texture mapping units, 80 raster operation units, 56 RT cores, and 224 tensor cores. The RTX 4070 SUPER also includes tensor cores, which the 820M lacks entirely.

The memory architectures are fundamentally different. The RTX 4070 SUPER uses dedicated GDDR6X memory with a 192-bit bus and 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 820M relies on system-shared memory, with the bus width, capacity, and bandwidth all dependent on the host platform. This architectural choice affects latency, bandwidth, and capacity, though the database cannot quantify the 820M's effective memory performance.

The clock behavior also differs. The Radeon 820M has a base clock of 400 MHz and a boost clock of 2800 MHz. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a base clock of 1980 MHz and a boost clock of 2475 MHz. The 820M's higher boost clock relative to its base clock reflects its integrated, power-constrained design. The RTX 4070 SUPER's memory runs at 1313 MHz with 21 Gbps effective speed.

Specification Differences

The physical specifications separate these parts into different product categories. The Radeon 820M is an IGP with no slot width, no dimensions, no power connectors, and no suggested PSU. The RTX 4070 SUPER is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm by 112 mm by 42 mm, requiring a 1x 16-pin power connector and a 550 W suggested PSU.

The bus interfaces differ: the Radeon 820M uses PCIe 4.0 x8, while the RTX 4070 SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs also differ, with the 820M listed as "Portable Device Dependent" and the RTX 4070 SUPER offering 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The transistor and die data exist only for the RTX 4070 SUPER, with 35,800 million transistors on a 294 mm² die. The Radeon 820M's transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. The production statuses differ: the 820M is Active, while the RTX 4070 SUPER is End-of-life. The release dates differ by roughly one year, with the RTX 4070 SUPER launching on 2024-01-16 and the Radeon 820M on 2025-02-28.

The TDP figures represent a 14.7 times difference, with the 820M at 15 W and the RTX 4070 SUPER at 220 W. The RTX 4070 SUPER has a launch MSRP of 599 USD, while the 820M has no recorded launch MSRP. The pixel rate, texture rate, and FP32 figures all favor the RTX 4070 SUPER by large margins, as detailed in the benchmark section. The FP16 figures match the FP32 figures for both GPUs at a 1:1 ratio, with the RTX 4070 SUPER at 35.48 TFLOPS and the 820M at 716.8 GFLOPS.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
820M
RTX 4070 SUPER
Core Specs
Shading Units
128
7,168 +5500.0%
Shaders
128
7,168 +5500.0%
TMUs
8
224 +2700.0%
ROPs
4
80 +1900.0%
Compute Units
2
—
SM Count
—
56
Clocks
Base Clock
400 MHz
1980 MHz
Boost Clock
2800 MHz
2475 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1313 MHz 21 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
12 GB
VRAM (MB)
—
12,288
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6X
Memory Bus
System Shared
192 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
504.2 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
1024 KB
48 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
11.20 GPixel/s
198.0 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
22.40 GTexel/s
554.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
716.8 GFLOPS
35.48 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
44.80 GFLOPS (1:16)
554.4 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
716.8 GFLOPS (1:1)
35.48 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
2
56 +2700.0%
Tensor Cores
—
224
Power
TDP
15 W
220 W
TDP (W)
15
220 +1366.7%
Suggested PSU
—
550 W
Power Connectors
None
1x 16-pin
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
Ada Lovelace
GPU Name
Krackan Point 2
AD104
Generation
Navi III IGP (Strix Point Mobile)
GeForce 40
Process Size
4 nm
5 nm
Transistors
unknown
35,800 million
Die Size
unknown
294 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
—
121.8M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
—
8.9
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Dual-slot
Length
—
267 mm 10.5 inches
Height
—
112 mm 4.4 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
—
599 USD
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 30
Successor
—
GeForce 50
View Radeon 820M Details View GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER Details