AMD Radeon 820M vs AMD Radeon RX 9060 Comparison
AMD Radeon 820M
Radeon RX 9060
PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS
Analysis: AMD Radeon 820M vs AMD Radeon RX 9060
The Verdict
The AMD Radeon 820M and AMD Radeon RX 9060 occupy completely different positions in the database. The 820M is an integrated graphics processor with 128 shading units, a 15 W TDP, and no recorded benchmark scores. The RX 9060 is a discrete dual-slot card with 1792 shading units, 8 GB of GDDR6 memory, and an average benchmark score of 16014. The RX 9060 sits at the 59th percentile of all GPUs, while the 820M sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of 0.
The RX 9060 is the only viable choice for any workload that stresses the GPU. Its nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti at 16129 average score (0.7% ahead), the AMD Radeon R9 370X at 15862 (1% behind), the AMD Radeon RX 7700 at 15852 (1% behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5500 at 15679 (2.1% behind). The RX 9060 effectively trades blows with the RTX 3060 Ti and sits marginally ahead of the R9 370X and RX 7700 based on average score.
The 820M has no benchmark entries, no nearest rivals, and no measured average score. Its role is confined to portable devices where the system memory is shared and the display outputs depend on the host laptop. For a builder assembling a desktop with a dedicated graphics slot, the RX 9060 is the only realistic option. For a thin-and-light portable device, the 820M exists as an integrated fallback, but the database contains no performance evidence to recommend it for any specific task.
FAQ
Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?
A: The RX 9060 boosts to 2990 MHz, while the 820M boosts to 2800 MHz. The RX 9060 also has a game clock of 2400 MHz and a base clock of 1700 MHz, compared to the 820M base clock of 400 MHz.
Q: How much memory does each GPU have?
A: The RX 9060 has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 288.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 820M uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, so its memory size, type, and bus width are all listed as system shared.
Q: What is the power consumption difference?
A: The 820M has a TDP of 15 W and requires no power connectors. The RX 9060 has a TDP of 132 W, uses a single 8-pin connector, and the database suggests a 300 W power supply.
Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?
A: Both list DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) support. The 820M has 2 RT cores, while the RX 9060 has 28 RT cores.
Q: What is the RX 9060's closest competitor in the database?
A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has an average score of 16129, which is 0.7% higher than the RX 9060's 16014. The AMD Radeon R9 370X and RX 7700 both score about 1% lower.
Q: What is the difference in pixel throughput?
A: The RX 9060 delivers 191.4 GPixel/s, while the 820M delivers 11.20 GPixel/s. The RX 9060 also produces 334.9 GTexel/s versus 22.40 GTexel/s for the 820M.
Architecture Differences
The two GPUs come from different architecture generations and different chip designs. The 820M uses the Krackan Point 2 chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, belonging to the Navi III IGP generation for Strix Point Mobile. The RX 9060 uses the Navi 44 chip with RDNA 4.0 architecture, belonging to the Navi IV generation of the Radeon RX 9000 series.
Both are built on a 4 nm process at TSMC. The RX 9060 packs 29,700 million transistors on a 199 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 149.2 million per mm². The 820M has unknown transistor count and die size in the database.
The RX 9060 has 1792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 raster operation pipelines. The 820M has 128 shading units, 8 TMUs, and 4 ROPs. Ray tracing hardware differs sharply: 28 RT cores on the RX 9060 versus 2 on the 820M. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.
Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The RX 9060 connects via PCIe 5.0 x16, while the 820M uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The RX 9060 has fixed display outputs of 1x HDMI 2.1b and 2x DisplayPort 2.1a; the 820M outputs are portable device dependent.
The RX 9060 predecessor is listed as Navi III, and the 820M predecessor is Navi II IGP. The 820M has no listed codename, while the RX 9060 codename is Strix Point.
Specification Differences
The clock structures differ substantially. The 820M runs a 400 MHz base and 2800 MHz boost. The RX 9060 runs a 1700 MHz base, 2400 MHz game clock, and 2990 MHz boost. Memory clocks are system shared for the 820M, while the RX 9060 memory runs at 2250 MHz with 18 Gbps effective.
Memory configuration separates the two entirely. The 820M has system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The RX 9060 has 8 GB GDDR6, a 128-bit bus, and 288.0 GB/s bandwidth.
Compute throughput shows the scale of the gap. The 820M delivers 716.8 GFLOPS FP32 and 716.8 GFLOPS FP16 at a 1:1 ratio. The RX 9060 delivers 21.43 TFLOPS FP32 and 21.43 TFLOPS FP16, also at 1:1.
Pixel and texture rates follow the same pattern. The 820M produces 11.20 GPixel/s and 22.40 GTexel/s. The RX 9060 produces 191.4 GPixel/s and 334.9 GTexel/s.
Physical and power characteristics differ completely. The 820M is an IGP with 15 W TDP and no power connectors. The RX 9060 is a dual-slot card with 132 W TDP, one 8-pin connector, and a suggested 300 W power supply. Release dates are also distinct: the 820M launched on 2025-02-28, and the RX 9060 launched on 2025-08-04.
Head-to-Head Benchmarks
The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the two GPUs. The 820M has no benchmark entries at all. The RX 9060 has ten recorded benchmark scores, which can be examined on their own.
In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the RX 9060 scores 3322. Geekbench OpenCL shows 88183, and Geekbench Vulkan shows 39476. Passmark results include DirectX 10 at 104, DirectX 11 at 182, DirectX 12 at 44, DirectX 9 at 280, G2D at 1002, G3D at 17631, and GPU compute at 9919. The average benchmark score is 16014.
Because the 820M has no recorded measurements, every benchmark comparison defaults to the RX 9060. The RX 9060's nearest rival data provides context for its standing. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti scores 16129, which is 0.7% higher. The AMD Radeon R9 370X scores 15862, which is 1% lower. The AMD Radeon RX 7700 scores 15852, also 1% lower. The AMD Radeon Pro W5500 scores 15679, which is 2.1% lower.
The RX 9060's percentile rank of 59 places it above the majority of all GPUs in the database. The 820M's percentile rank of 50 with an average score of 0 suggests no performance data was captured, so any comparison must rely on architectural and specification differences rather than measured results.
Where Each One Wins
The RX 9060 wins in every measurable category. Its 1792 shading units versus 128, its 28 RT cores versus 2, its 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 versus shared system memory, and its 21.43 TFLOPS versus 716.8 GFLOPS all point to a GPU built for discrete desktop graphics workloads. The 288.0 GB/s memory bandwidth and 191.4 GPixel/s pixel rate support high-resolution rendering and texture-heavy scenes.
The 820M wins only in power efficiency and integration. Its 15 W TDP requires no power connector and no suggested PSU, making it suitable for portable devices where the display outputs depend on the host system. Its PCIe 4.0 x8 interface matches a mobile platform's constraints. The 820M's 400 MHz base clock suggests it idles at very low power, though the database does not include measured power consumption.
For users building a desktop system with a PCIe slot and a 300 W PSU, the RX 9060 is the clear choice. Its average score of 16014 places it within 1% of the Radeon RX 7700 and 1% behind the R9 370X, while matching the RTX 3060 Ti within 0.7%. The RX 9060 offers a game clock of 2400 MHz and a boost of 2990 MHz, with 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus.
For a portable device with no discrete graphics slot, the 820M is the only option of the two. It shares system memory, has no fixed display outputs, and draws 15 W. The database holds no benchmark scores for it, so its performance cannot be quantified. The architectural generation, RDNA 3.5 versus RDNA 4.0, favors the RX 9060, but the 820M's integrated nature means it does not compete in the same product class.
The recorded data shows a clear split: the RX 9060 is a discrete GPU with measured performance at the 59th percentile, while the 820M is an IGP with no measured performance. Any workload involving 3D rendering, compute, or ray tracing belongs to the RX 9060. The 820M serves only as an integrated solution for systems where a discrete card cannot be installed.