AMD Radeon 8065S vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no recorded head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Radeon 8065S and the Lisuan Tech LX PRO. Both entries show an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals listed. The absence of measured performance data means direct comparisons must rely entirely on architectural and specification differences rather than empirical results.

The AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS. The LX PRO holds a 60% advantage in raw FP32 throughput, a substantial margin that suggests significantly higher shader output. In FP16 workloads, the gap widens further: the LX PRO reaches 49.15 TFLOPS through a 2:1 ratio, while the 8065S maintains 15.36 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio. The LX PRO offers more than triple the FP16 throughput, which could matter for AI inference or workloads that leverage reduced precision.

Texture throughput tells a different story. The 8065S achieves 480.0 GTexel/s, while the LX PRO records 384.0 GTexel/s. Despite having 160 TMUs versus 192 TMUs, the Radeon's higher clock speeds push its texture fill rate 25% ahead. Pixel rates are identical at 192.0 GPixel/s for both cards, meaning rasterization output per pixel is matched despite the LX PRO having 96 ROPs against 64 on the 8065S.

The LX PRO's 6144 shading units versus 2560 on the 8065S explains its FP32 lead. However, the 8065S compensates with a 3000 MHz boost clock compared to no recorded boost clock for the LX PRO. The Radeon's base clock of 1295 MHz also stands alone; the LX PRO lists no base or boost frequencies in the database.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design lineages. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, part of the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. It is manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a die size of 308 mm². The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the 7G105 chip with TrueGPU architecture from the 7G100 generation, built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, with die size listed as unknown.

The Radeon 8065S includes 40 dedicated ray tracing cores, while the LX PRO lists no RT core count. This suggests the AMD part has explicit hardware acceleration for ray tracing workloads, whereas the LX PRO may rely on compute shaders or lack comparable dedicated RT hardware. Neither GPU lists tensor cores.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The 8065S uses system shared memory with type, bus width, and bandwidth all marked as system dependent. The LX PRO carries 24 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s of bandwidth and a memory clock of 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective). This gives the LX PRO predictable, high-bandwidth local memory, while the 8065S depends entirely on platform memory configuration.

The LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3, while the 8065S supports Vulkan 1.4. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The Radeon uses PCIe 5.0 x16, the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The 8065S is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) with a dual-slot form factor listed for the LX PRO.

Power characteristics differ enormously. The 8065S has a TDP of 55 W with no power connectors, appropriate for an integrated part. The LX PRO draws 225 W, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and recommends a 550 W power supply. The LX PRO measures 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, compared to 15.36 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon 8065S. The LX PRO leads by roughly 60% in this metric.

Q: How do the memory configurations differ?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S relies on system shared memory with bandwidth dependent on the host platform. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO includes 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Does the AMD Radeon 8065S support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the 8065S lists 40 ray tracing cores under RDNA 3.5 architecture. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO does not list any dedicated ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the power requirement for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP and uses no power connectors. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, requires a single 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 550 W power supply.

Q: Which GPU supports a newer PCIe interface?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16.

Q: What process nodes are used for each chip?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm process at TSMC with a 308 mm² die. The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses a 6 nm process, also at TSMC, with die size listed as unknown.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8065S | Lisuan Tech LX PRO |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | TrueGPU |

| Generation | Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) | 7G100 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | unknown |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | none recorded |

| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | none recorded |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 24 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus Width | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 432.0 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | System Shared | 2250 MHz (18 Gbps effective) |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 6144 |

| TMUs | 160 | 192 |

| ROPs | 64 | 96 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | none recorded |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 192.0 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 384.0 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 15.36 TFLOPS | 24.58 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) | 49.15 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 225 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | none recorded | 550 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.3 |

| Dimensions | none recorded | 248 mm x 118 mm x 48 mm |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2026-03-16 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8065S wins in texture fill rate, delivering 480.0 GTexel/s versus 384.0 GTexel/s on the LX PRO. It also holds advantages in process technology at 4 nm versus 6 nm, newer PCIe generation (5.0 versus 4.0), newer Vulkan support (1.4 versus 1.3), and includes dedicated ray tracing cores that the LX PRO lacks. Its 55 W TDP makes it suitable for integrated deployments with no power connectors and no external power supply requirement.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO wins in raw compute throughput. Its 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figures substantially exceed the Radeon's 15.36 TFLOPS in both precisions. The 24 GB GDDR6 memory with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth provides dedicated, high-speed storage that does not depend on system memory configuration. The LX PRO also has more shading units (6144 versus 2560), more TMUs (192 versus 160), and more ROPs (96 versus 64). Its 225 W TDP and 550 W suggested power supply indicate a discrete, performance-oriented design with four DisplayPort 1.4a outputs.

The Radeon 8065S suits scenarios where power efficiency, compact integration, and ray tracing support matter. The LX PRO suits scenarios where maximum compute throughput, dedicated memory capacity, and multi-display output take priority.

The Verdict

The data shows two GPUs designed for opposite ends of the spectrum. The AMD Radeon 8065S, as an integrated part with 55 W TDP, targets portable or low-power devices where space and thermal constraints dominate. Its 3000 MHz boost clock and 480.0 GTexel/s texture rate show strong per-watt characteristics, and the 40 ray tracing cores provide hardware acceleration absent from the LX PRO.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO presents as a high-power discrete solution. Its 225 W TDP, dual-slot cooler, 16-pin power connector, and 550 W suggested power supply point to a desktop-oriented card. The 24.58 TFLOPS FP32 and 49.15 TFLOPS FP16 figures, combined with 24 GB of GDDR6 at 432.0 GB/s, position it for compute-heavy applications that benefit from large local memory and high arithmetic throughput.

Without benchmark scores in the database, the specification sheet favors the LX PRO for peak performance and the 8065S for efficiency and ray tracing capability. Users who need maximum shader throughput and dedicated memory should consider the LX PRO. Users who need integrated graphics with modern features and minimal power draw should consider the 8065S. The two cards occupy separate market segments with little overlap in their intended use cases.