AMD Radeon 8065S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains benchmark results for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, while the AMD Radeon 8065S has no individual benchmark scores listed. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers an average benchmark score of 31087, placing it in the 76th percentile of all GPUs tracked by the database. The Radeon 8065S sits at the 50th percentile with an average benchmark score of 0, meaning no direct head-to-head comparison can be made from the measured data.

Focusing on the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's strongest results, the Geekbench OpenCL test produces a score of 199267, while the Geekbench Vulkan test reaches 53683. The Passmark G3D score is 31811, and the Passmark GPU compute score is 18372. These results indicate a high-performing graphics processor, but the absence of corresponding AMD 8065S scores prevents any direct numerical comparison.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rival data provides context for its standing. The NVIDIA Quadro M5000 averages 31206, which is 0.4% higher than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's average. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q averages 31220, also 0.4% higher. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell averages 31532, 1.4% higher, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX averages 31676, 1.9% higher. These figures show the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER sits within a tight competitive band, trailing its closest rivals by less than two percent.

The AMD Radeon 8065S has no recorded benchmark scores and no nearest rivals in the database. Its 50th percentile ranking indicates a mid-pack position based on aggregate data, but the lack of individual measurements means the database cannot validate any performance claims for this part.

FAQ

Q: Does the database show any benchmark scores for the AMD Radeon 8065S?

A: No. The Radeon 8065S has an empty benchmarks list, an average benchmark score of 0, and no nearest rivals recorded. Only the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has individual benchmark results in the database.

Q: What is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's best benchmark result?

A: The highest recorded score is 199267 on Geekbench OpenCL. The next highest is the Passmark G3D score of 31811, followed by the Passmark GPU compute score of 18372 and the Geekbench Vulkan score of 53683.

Q: How does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compare to its closest rivals?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER trails the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 and NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q by 0.4%, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell by 1.4%, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX by 1.9% in average benchmark score.

Q: What percentile ranking does each GPU hold?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER ranks in the 76th percentile of all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon 8065S ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: Is the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER still in production?

A: No. The database lists its production status as end-of-life. The AMD Radeon 8065S is marked as active.

The Verdict

The data supports a clear verdict: the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only one of the two cards with measurable benchmark performance in the database. Its average score of 31087 and 76th percentile ranking place it well above the Radeon 8065S, which has no recorded scores and sits at the 50th percentile. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also carries a launch MSRP of 799 USD.

The Radeon 8065S cannot be evaluated on benchmark merit because the database contains no measurements for it. Its 50th percentile standing appears to reflect general aggregate data rather than any specific test results. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, by contrast, has ten separate benchmark entries spanning DirectX 9, DirectX 10, DirectX 11, DirectX 12, OpenCL, Vulkan, and compute workloads.

For any user comparing these two parts, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option with demonstrated performance data. The Radeon 8065S remains an unmeasured product in the database, and no performance conclusions can be drawn from the available information.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every physical and electrical specification. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm process, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm process, both from TSMC. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a die size of 379 mm² and 45,900 million transistors, with a transistor density of 121.1M per mm². The Radeon 8065S has a die size of 308 mm², and its transistor count is unknown.

Clock speeds diverge significantly. The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2340 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz, with memory clocked at 1313 MHz, listed as 21 Gbps effective.

Memory configurations are entirely different. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s of bandwidth.

Compute resources favor the NVIDIA card heavily. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8448 shading units, 264 texture mapping units, 96 ROPs, 66 RT cores, and 264 tensor cores. The Radeon 8065S has 2560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 RT cores. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER reaches 44.10 TFLOPS FP32 and FP16, while the Radeon 8065S reaches 15.36 TFLOPS in both. Pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s versus 480.0 GTexel/s.

Power and physical characteristics also differ. The Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP, is an integrated graphics processor with no power connectors, and uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a 285 W TDP, a triple-slot cooler, a single 16-pin power connector, a 600 W suggested PSU, and uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Its dimensions are 310 mm in length, 140 mm in height, and 61 mm in width. Display outputs on the NVIDIA card include 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a, while the AMD part's outputs are portable device dependent.

Both cards support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8065S is built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, using the Gorgon Halo chip, and belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. Its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses Ada Lovelace architecture with the AD103 chip, belongs to the GeForce 40-series, and lists GeForce 30 as its predecessor and GeForce 50 as its successor.

The Radeon 8065S is an integrated GPU with system shared memory, meaning it relies on the host system's memory rather than dedicated VRAM. This is a fundamental architectural difference: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER carries 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6X memory with a dedicated 256-bit memory bus.

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 264 tensor cores, which the Radeon 8065S lacks entirely. Both parts have ray tracing cores, with the NVIDIA card offering 66 RT cores versus 40 on the AMD card. The FP16 to FP32 ratio is 1:1 on both, but the NVIDIA card's raw throughput is roughly 2.87 times higher in FP32 and FP16 operations.

The Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm process node, which is smaller than the 5 nm node used by the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. However, the NVIDIA chip packs substantially more transistors on a larger die, resulting in a much higher transistor density. The AMD part's transistor count is listed as unknown, so no direct density comparison is possible.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every measurable category where data exists. It has higher shading unit count, more TMUs, more ROPs, more RT cores, tensor core support, higher clock rates for base operation, dedicated high-bandwidth memory, higher pixel and texture rates, and roughly 2.87 times the FP32 throughput of the Radeon 8065S. Its benchmark scores confirm this: the Passmark DirectX 12 score of 119, DirectX 11 score of 278, and DirectX 9 score of 360 all demonstrate functional performance across legacy and modern APIs.

The AMD Radeon 8065S wins in power efficiency on paper. Its 55 W TDP is dramatically lower than the 285 W TDP of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, and it requires no power connectors and no suggested PSU wattage. It also uses a more advanced 4 nm process node, which typically indicates a more modern manufacturing approach. Its boost clock of 3000 MHz exceeds the NVIDIA card's 2610 MHz boost, and it uses the newer PCIe 5.0 x16 interface versus PCIe 4.0 x16 on the NVIDIA card.

For use cases, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice for any workload requiring measured graphics performance, ray tracing, or tensor-based compute. The Radeon 8065S, as an integrated part with system shared memory and a 55 W TDP, fits scenarios where low power draw and a compact integrated form factor take priority over raw performance. The database contains no benchmark evidence that the Radeon 8065S can compete with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in any rendering or compute workload.