AMD Radeon 8065S vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a fundamental performance gap between the AMD Radeon 8065S and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti. The RTX 4070 Ti holds an average benchmark score of 44795, placing it at the 84th percentile among all GPUs in the database. The Radeon 8065S, by contrast, has no recorded benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile, with an average score of 0. This is not a close contest in raw compute output.

The RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS. That means the NVIDIA part offers roughly 2.6 times the single-precision throughput. The texture rate follows the same pattern: 626.4 GTexel/s for the RTX 4070 Ti versus 480.0 GTexel/s for the AMD part, a 30% advantage in texture fill. Pixel rate is closer, with the NVIDIA card at 208.8 GPixel/s versus 192.0 GPixel/s for the AMD integrated processor, a modest 8.75% lead.

In specific benchmark tests, the RTX 4070 Ti shows strong results across multiple APIs. It scores 5024 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, 176953 in Geekbench OpenCL, and 213808 in Geekbench Vulkan. The Passmark suite shows a G3D score of 31624, a GPU compute score of 18396, and a G2D score of 1200. DirectX-specific Passmark tests range from 116 in DX12 to 352 in DX9, with DX11 at 288 and DX10 at 187. The Radeon 8065S has no comparable entries in the database, so direct head-to-head test scores cannot be established from the recorded data.

The RTX 4070 Ti also positions cleanly against its nearest rivals. It trails the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 Mobile by only 0.8%, sits 1.3% behind the AMD Radeon Pro 5500 XT, and is 1.7% behind the Intel Arc A730M. It leads the NVIDIA RTX A6000 by 1.6%. These narrow margins confirm that the RTX 4070 Ti competes at a very specific performance tier, one that the Radeon 8065S does not approach according to the database.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti wins every measurable category that exists in the database. It has a higher boost clock at 2610 MHz versus 3000 MHz for the AMD part, though here the AMD chip actually boosts higher despite its lower base clock. The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz, which is substantially lower than the RTX 4070 Ti's 2310 MHz base. The AMD part's 3000 MHz boost clock is notable, but the NVIDIA card compensates with far more execution resources.

The Radeon 8065S wins in power efficiency as a category. Its TDP is 55 W, while the RTX 4070 Ti draws 285 W. The AMD part uses no power connectors and is an integrated graphics processor with a slot width of IGP, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti is a dual-slot card requiring a single 16-pin connector and a 600 W suggested power supply. For systems where power delivery is limited, the Radeon 8065S is the only viable option between the two.

The RTX 4070 Ti also leads in memory bandwidth with 504.2 GB/s over a 192-bit bus using 12 GB of GDDR6X. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with bus width, size, and type all listed as system shared, and bandwidth marked as system dependent. Dedicated VRAM gives the NVIDIA card a structural advantage in memory-intensive workloads. The AMD part's memory performance cannot be quantified in the database because it depends entirely on the host system.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and manufacturing processes. The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The die size is 308 mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti uses the AD104 chip on Ada Lovelace architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process also at TSMC, with a die size of 294 mm² and 35,800 million transistors. The transistor density for the NVIDIA chip is recorded as 121.8M per mm².

Core counts differ substantially. The Radeon 8065S has 2560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. The RTX 4070 Ti has 7680 shading units, 240 TMUs, 80 ROPs, 60 ray tracing cores, and 240 tensor cores. The AMD part has no tensor core count listed. The NVIDIA card triples shading units and leads by 50% in TMUs, 25% in ROPs, and 50% in ray tracing cores.

Memory architecture is completely different. The Radeon 8065S relies on system shared memory with no dedicated VRAM, while the RTX 4070 Ti uses 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus. The memory clock for the NVIDIA card is 1313 MHz, which translates to 21 Gbps effective. The AMD part's memory clock is listed as system shared.

Interface support is similar on the API side. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The bus interface differs: the Radeon 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 4070 Ti uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The display outputs also differ. The AMD part has portable device dependent outputs, while the RTX 4070 Ti has 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a.

The form factors are very different. The RTX 4070 Ti is a dual-slot card measuring 285 mm in length, 112 mm in height, and 42 mm in width. The Radeon 8065S is an integrated graphics processor with no dimensions recorded for length, height, or width. The production status also differs: the Radeon 8065S is active, while the RTX 4070 Ti is end-of-life. The NVIDIA card's predecessor is the GeForce 30 series and its successor is the GeForce 50 series. The AMD part's predecessor is Polaris Mobile.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher FP32 throughput?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti delivers 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 performance, while the AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS. The NVIDIA card has roughly 2.6 times the single-precision compute throughput.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The Radeon 8065S has a TDP of 55 W and requires no power connectors, while the RTX 4070 Ti has a TDP of 285 W and requires a single 16-pin connector with a 600 W suggested power supply.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 12 GB of GDDR6X on a 192-bit bus with 504.2 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory, with its bandwidth listed as system dependent.

Q: What are the clock speeds for each card?

A: The Radeon 8065S has a base clock of 1295 MHz and a boost clock of 3000 MHz. The RTX 4070 Ti has a base clock of 2310 MHz and a boost clock of 2610 MHz.

Q: Which GPU has more ray tracing cores?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti has 60 ray tracing cores, while the Radeon 8065S has 40. The NVIDIA card also has 240 tensor cores, while no tensor core count is recorded for the AMD part.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the RTX 4070 Ti uses a 5 nm TSMC process. The AMD chip has a die size of 308 mm², and the NVIDIA chip has a die size of 294 mm².

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8065S | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Ada Lovelace |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 5 nm |

| Transistors | Unknown | 35,800 million |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | 294 mm² |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 2310 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | 2610 MHz |

| Memory Size | System Shared | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | System Shared | GDDR6X |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 504.2 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 7680 |

| TMUs | 160 | 240 |

| ROPs | 64 | 80 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 60 |

| Tensor Cores | Not listed | 240 |

| FP32 | 15.36 TFLOPS | 40.09 TFLOPS |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 208.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 626.4 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 55 W | 285 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Dual-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | 1x 16-pin |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 600 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |

| Dimensions | Not listed | 285 mm x 112 mm x 42 mm |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2023-01-02 |

| Predecessor | Polaris Mobile | GeForce 30 |

| Successor | Not listed | GeForce 50 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 799 USD |

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two products. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti is a dedicated add-in card with 40.09 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, 12 GB of GDDR6X memory, 7680 shading units, and a 285 W TDP. It holds the 84th percentile position among all GPUs in the database and has substantial benchmark evidence across DirectX, OpenCL, Vulkan, and Passmark tests. It competes within 1.7% of its nearest recorded rivals, including the RTX 5090 Mobile, Radeon Pro 5500 XT, RTX A6000, and Intel Arc A730M.

The AMD Radeon 8065S is an integrated graphics processor built on RDNA 3.5 with a 55 W TDP, no power connectors, and system shared memory. It boosts to 3000 MHz, which is higher than the RTX 4070 Ti's 2610 MHz boost, and it uses a more advanced 4 nm TSMC process. Its 15.36 TFLOPS FP32 throughput, 40 ray tracing cores, and 480.0 GTexel/s texture rate place it at the 50th percentile with no recorded benchmark scores.

The RTX 4070 Ti is the clear performance leader in every measurable workload category. The Radeon 8065S is the appropriate choice only where power constraints are severe, given its 55 W TDP and integrated form factor. The RTX 4070 Ti requires a 600 W suggested power supply and a dual-slot footprint, making it unsuitable for compact or low-power systems. The AMD part uses PCIe 5.0 x16 and has no dedicated memory, meaning its performance is system dependent. For users with a 600 W power supply and room for a 285 mm dual-slot card, the RTX 4070 Ti's 2.6 times FP32 throughput and dedicated 12 GB VRAM make it the only reasonable option based on the recorded data. The Radeon 8065S offers no benchmark results to suggest otherwise.