AMD Radeon 8065S vs Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database does not contain direct head-to-head benchmark scores for the AMD Radeon 8065S and the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350. There are no wins recorded for either part, and the average benchmark score for both entries is zero. This absence of measured results means a direct performance comparison cannot be produced from the available data. What can be analyzed is the theoretical output indicated by each product's specifications, which differ substantially.

The AMD Radeon 8065S shows a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 records a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s. This difference reflects the Intel part's design as a compute-focused accelerator with no display outputs, whereas the AMD part is an integrated graphics processor intended for portable devices. In texture throughput, the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 reaches 1,388.8 GTexel/s, which is nearly three times the 480.0 GTexel/s of the AMD Radeon 8065S. The FP32 compute figures follow a similar pattern: the Intel part delivers 44.44 TFLOPS, compared to 15.36 TFLOPS for the AMD part. Both products list identical FP16 performance at a 1:1 ratio with their FP32 values.

The AMD Radeon 8065S boosts to 3000 MHz from a 1295 MHz base clock. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 boosts to 1550 MHz from a 750 MHz base clock. Clock speed alone does not explain the compute gap, since the Intel part has 14,336 shading units versus 2,560 for the AMD part. The Intel part also carries 896 texture mapping units, while the AMD part has 160. The AMD part has 64 ROPs; the Intel part has zero ROPs, consistent with its lack of a rasterization pipeline.

Where Each One Wins

Based on the specification data, the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 wins in raw compute throughput. Its FP32 output of 44.44 TFLOPS is roughly 2.9 times the AMD Radeon 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS. Texture rate shows a similar advantage: 1,388.8 GTexel/s versus 480.0 GTexel/s. The Intel part also has far more shading units (14,336 versus 2,560) and TMUs (896 versus 160), which supports its role in heavily parallel workloads.

The AMD Radeon 8065S wins in areas tied to its integrated nature and portability. It has a 55 W TDP, while the Intel part consumes 450 W. The AMD part requires no power connectors and occupies an IGP slot width, while the Intel part uses an OAM Module form factor. The AMD part also includes display outputs, described as portable device dependent, whereas the Intel part has no outputs. The AMD Radeon 8065S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and lists no Vulkan support. For client-side graphics and mobile use, the AMD part has structural advantages. For data center compute, the Intel part has the clear throughput lead.

The AMD part's memory configuration is system shared, meaning its bandwidth is system dependent. The Intel part has 96 GB of HBM2e memory on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 2.46 TB/s of bandwidth. This fixed, high-bandwidth memory pool is a decisive advantage for large data sets that cannot fit in shared system memory.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5 architecture, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its die size is 308 mm². The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses the Ponte Vecchio chip built on Generation 12.5 architecture, fabricated on a 10 nm process at Intel. Its die size is 1280 mm². Transistor counts differ sharply: the Intel part has 100,000 million transistors, while the AMD part's transistor count is listed as unknown. Intel's transistor density is recorded at 78.1M per mm²; no density figure exists for the AMD part.

The AMD part belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation, with a predecessor listed as Polaris Mobile. The Intel part belongs to the Data Center GPU (Ponte Vecchio) generation, with a successor listed as H3C Graphics. The AMD part's ray tracing core count is 40, while the Intel part has 112 ray tracing cores. Neither part lists tensor cores in the database.

API support separates the two architectures. The AMD Radeon 8065S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 supports DirectX 12 (12_1) and OpenGL 4.6, with no Vulkan version recorded. The AMD part's RDNA 3.5 architecture targets modern graphics features, while Intel's Generation 12.5 architecture prioritizes compute density over display and rasterization features.

Specification Differences

The two products differ across every major specification category in the database.

Process node: 4 nm for AMD, 10 nm for Intel. Foundry: TSMC for AMD, Intel for Intel. Die size: 308 mm² versus 1280 mm². Transistor density: unknown for AMD, 78.1M per mm² for Intel.

Base clock: 1295 MHz (AMD) versus 750 MHz (Intel). Boost clock: 3000 MHz (AMD) versus 1550 MHz (Intel). Memory clock: system shared for AMD, 1200 MHz with 2.4 Gbps effective for Intel.

Memory size: system shared for AMD, 96 GB for Intel. Memory type: system shared versus HBM2e. Bus width: system shared versus 8192 bit. Bandwidth: system dependent versus 2.46 TB/s.

Shading units: 2,560 versus 14,336. TMUs: 160 versus 896. ROPs: 64 versus 0. Ray tracing cores: 40 versus 112. Pixel rate: 192.0 GPixel/s versus 0 MPixel/s. Texture rate: 480.0 GTexel/s versus 1,388.8 GTexel/s. FP32: 15.36 TFLOPS versus 44.44 TFLOPS. FP16: 15.36 TFLOPS versus 44.44 TFLOPS, both at 1:1 ratio.

TDP: 55 W versus 450 W. Slot width: IGP versus OAM Module. Power connectors: none for AMD, none listed for Intel. Suggested PSU: none for AMD, 850 W for Intel. Bus interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 for both. Display outputs: portable device dependent for AMD, no outputs for Intel.

Release date: 2025-12-31 for AMD, 2023-01-09 for Intel. Production status is active for both. Neither part has a launch MSRP recorded in the database.

The Intel part's pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s and lack of display outputs confirm it is not designed for graphics presentation. The AMD part's system shared memory and portable device dependent outputs confirm it is designed for integrated mobile use.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 records 44.44 TFLOPS, compared to 15.36 TFLOPS for the AMD Radeon 8065S.

Q: What memory configuration does each GPU use?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses 96 GB of HBM2e on an 8192-bit bus with 2.46 TB/s bandwidth.

Q: Can the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 output video to a display?

A: No. The database lists its display outputs as "No outputs" and its pixel rate as 0 MPixel/s, indicating no display capability.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP, while the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has a 450 W TDP and an 850 W suggested PSU.

Q: Which GPU supports Vulkan?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S supports Vulkan 1.4. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 has no Vulkan version recorded in the database.

Q: How do the architectures differ?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S uses RDNA 3.5 on a 4 nm TSMC process with a 308 mm² die. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 uses Generation 12.5 on a 10 nm Intel process with a 1280 mm² die and 100,000 million transistors.

The Verdict

The data indicates two products designed for different purposes with no recorded benchmark overlap. The Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350 delivers substantially higher compute throughput: 44.44 TFLOPS FP32, 1,388.8 GTexel/s texture rate, and 2.46 TB/s memory bandwidth across 96 GB of HBM2e. Its 14,336 shading units and 112 ray tracing cores position it as a data center compute accelerator. The 450 W TDP, OAM Module form factor, and absence of display outputs reinforce that positioning.

The AMD Radeon 8065S operates within a 55 W envelope, uses system shared memory, and includes display outputs for portable devices. Its 15.36 TFLOPS FP32 and 192.0 GPixel/s pixel rate, combined with its 4 nm TSMC process and 3000 MHz boost clock, make it a capable integrated graphics solution for mobile systems. Its DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 support indicate a full-featured client graphics stack.

Users requiring maximum FP32 throughput, large fixed memory pools, and high texture rates should select the Intel Data Center GPU Max 1350. Users needing an integrated GPU with display output, low power draw, and modern graphics API support in a portable form factor should select the AMD Radeon 8065S. The two parts do not compete in the same segment; the recorded specifications place them in separate usage categories.