AMD Radeon 8065S vs AMD Radeon PRO W7500 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains no direct head-to-head test results for the AMD Radeon 8065S versus the AMD Radeon PRO W7500. The Radeon 8065S has no recorded benchmark scores, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. The Radeon PRO W7500, by contrast, carries a full set of nine published benchmark results and sits at the 59th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

For the Radeon PRO W7500, the recorded data shows its strongest showing in the Geekbench Vulkan test at 68,634 points, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 58,213 points. In Passmark tests, the card scores 13,368 in G3D, 5,910 in GPU compute, 1,174 in G2D, 200 in DirectX 9, 125 in DirectX 11, 65 in DirectX 10, and 46 in DirectX 12. Its average benchmark score is 16,415.

The nearest rivals for the Radeon PRO W7500 provide context for these numbers. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell averages 16,408, a 0% difference. The AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT averages 16,361, putting the W7500 0.3% ahead. The AMD Radeon Pro 5600M averages 16,351, a 0.4% gap in favor of the W7500. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 averages 16,504, which places the W7500 0.5% behind that part. These deltas are all within one percentage point, indicating the W7500 performs in a tightly contested band around the 16,400 mark.

Because the Radeon 8065S lacks any recorded scores, the database cannot confirm a single comparative win for either product. The wins tally stands at zero for both sides. The Radeon 8065S does carry a 50th percentile ranking among all GPUs, but that figure derives from its specification profile rather than any measured benchmark output. The W7500, at the 59th percentile, has measured data supporting its position. Any direct performance comparison between these two cards remains unsupported by the current database records.

Architecture Differences

The two AMD parts come from different architectural generations and manufacturing nodes. The Radeon 8065S uses the Gorgon Halo chip built on RDNA 3.5, fabricated on a 4 nm process at TSMC. Its generation is listed as Navi Mobile (RX 8000M), placing it in the mobile GPU family. The Radeon PRO W7500 uses the Navi 33 chip on RDNA 3.0, with the codename Hotpink Bonefish, and belongs to the Radeon Pro Navi (Navi III Series) generation. It is built on a 6 nm process, also at TSMC.

Die size differs substantially. The Radeon 8065S measures 308 mm², while the W7500 is smaller at 204 mm². Transistor counts are only published for the W7500 at 13,300 million, with a transistor density of 65.2 million per mm². The Radeon 8065S transistor count is listed as unknown, so no density figure exists for it.

Memory architecture separates these two products clearly. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory, meaning its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth are all system dependent. The W7500 carries dedicated 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus, delivering 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The W7500 memory clock runs at 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective speed. The Radeon 8065S memory clock is also listed as system shared.

Compute resources differ in several respects. The Radeon 8065S has 2,560 shading units, 160 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, with 40 ray tracing cores. The W7500 has 1,792 shading units, 112 texture mapping units, and 64 render output units, with 28 ray tracing cores. The Radeon 8065S therefore fields more shaders, more TMUs, and more RT cores.

Clock speeds favor the Radeon 8065S in boost terms. Its base clock is 1,295 MHz and boost clock is 3,000 MHz. The W7500 runs a base clock of 1,500 MHz and a boost clock of 1,700 MHz. The W7500 starts higher but peaks much lower.

Rates derived from those clocks show the Radeon 8065S ahead. Pixel rate is 192.0 GPixel/s versus 108.8 GPixel/s for the W7500. Texture rate is 480.0 GTexel/s versus 190.4 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput is 15.36 TFLOPS for the 8065S versus 12.19 TFLOPS for the W7500. FP16 differs in ratio: the 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS at 1:1, while the W7500 reaches 24.37 TFLOPS at 2:1, meaning the W7500 processes FP16 at twice its FP32 rate.

Power and physical specifications also diverge. The Radeon 8065S has a 55 W TDP, is an integrated graphics processor (IGP), uses no power connectors, and its display outputs are portable device dependent. The W7500 has a 70 W TDP, is a single-slot card, also uses no power connectors, suggests a 250 W PSU, and offers 4x DisplayPort 2.1 outputs. The W7500 measures 216 mm by 115 mm by 20 mm. The Radeon 8065S has no listed dimensions.

Bus interfaces differ: the Radeon 8065S uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the W7500 uses PCIe 4.0 x8. Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The Radeon 8065S lists its predecessor as Polaris Mobile and its release date as 2025-12-31. The W7500 lists its predecessor as Radeon Pro Vega and released on 2023-08-02. Both are marked as Active in production status.

Where Each One Wins

Based on published specifications alone, the Radeon 8065S wins in raw throughput categories. Its FP32 figure of 15.36 TFLOPS stands 26% above the W7500's 12.19 TFLOPS. Its texture rate of 480.0 GTexel/s more than doubles the W7500's 190.4 GTexel/s, a 152% advantage. Its pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s beats 108.8 GPixel/s by 76%. The 8065S also holds a 3,000 MHz boost clock versus 1,700 MHz for the W7500, a 76% higher peak frequency. It has 43% more shading units (2,560 versus 1,792) and 43% more RT cores (40 versus 28).

The W7500 wins in memory and power efficiency categories. It has dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth on a 128 bit bus, whereas the 8065S depends entirely on system shared memory with bandwidth that varies by the host system. The W7500 also has a higher base clock (1,500 MHz versus 1,295 MHz). In FP16 compute, the W7500 reaches 24.37 TFLOPS versus 15.36 TFLOPS for the 8065S, a 59% advantage, due to its 2:1 FP16 ratio. The W7500 also benefits from a published launch MSRP of 429 USD, a figure the 8065S does not carry.

The W7500 additionally has measured benchmark data supporting its 59th percentile ranking, while the 8065S has no measured scores and sits at the 50th percentile. For professional use cases requiring validated performance, the W7500's recorded results in Geekbench and Passmark provide concrete evidence of its capabilities.

For mobile or integrated scenarios, the 8065S offers the advantage of being an IGP with a 55 W TDP, no power connectors, and portable device dependent outputs, making it suited to laptops or compact systems. The W7500 requires a slot, measures 216 mm in length, and carries a 70 W TDP with a 250 W suggested PSU, fitting desktop workstation builds.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute performance?

A: The AMD Radeon 8065S delivers 15.36 TFLOPS in FP32, which is 26% higher than the Radeon PRO W7500's 12.19 TFLOPS.

Q: Does the Radeon PRO W7500 have dedicated memory?

A: Yes, the W7500 has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128 bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 8065S uses system shared memory, so its memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all depend on the host system.

Q: What are the process nodes for these two GPUs?

A: The Radeon 8065S uses a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses a 6 nm TSMC process. Both are manufactured by TSMC.

Q: Which card has a higher boost clock?

A: The Radeon 8065S has a boost clock of 3,000 MHz, compared to 1,700 MHz for the Radeon PRO W7500. The W7500 has a higher base clock at 1,500 MHz versus 1,295 MHz.

Q: Are there benchmark scores available for the Radeon 8065S?

A: No, the database lists no benchmark scores for the Radeon 8065S. The Radeon PRO W7500 has nine recorded benchmark results, including a Geekbench Vulkan score of 68,634 and a Passmark G3D score of 13,368.

Q: How does the Radeon PRO W7500 compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The W7500 averages 16,415 in benchmark score. It sits 0.3% ahead of the AMD Radeon RX 5700 XT (16,361), 0.4% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro 5600M (16,351), and 0.5% behind the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 (16,504). It is effectively tied with the NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell (16,408, 0% delta).

The Verdict

The data supports a clear split between these two GPUs based on use case. The Radeon 8065S is a mobile-oriented integrated part with higher raw compute specifications: more shading units, more TMUs, more RT cores, a higher boost clock, and higher FP32, pixel, and texture rates. Its 4 nm process and 55 W TDP position it for power-constrained portable systems. Its system shared memory architecture means performance scales with the host system's memory configuration, which introduces variability absent from a dedicated card.

The Radeon PRO W7500 is a desktop workstation card with validated benchmark performance. Its 8 GB GDDR6 memory with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth offers predictable, dedicated bandwidth. Its 59th percentile ranking and average benchmark score of 16,415 place it in a competitive band with the RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell, RX 5700 XT, Radeon Pro 5600M, and RTX 5090 D V2, all within 0.5% of each other. Its FP16 throughput of 24.37 TFLOPS exceeds the 8065S's 15.36 TFLOPS, which matters for workloads leveraging FP16 acceleration.

Users requiring a drop-in workstation card with dedicated memory, known benchmark results, and professional DisplayPort 2.1 outputs should select the Radeon PRO W7500. Users integrating graphics into a portable device where system shared memory and a 55 W TDP are acceptable, and where the higher FP32 and texture throughput matter, should select the Radeon 8065S. The 8065S offers the higher theoretical ceiling in several compute categories, but the W7500 offers the only measured performance evidence in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Radeon 8065S | AMD Radeon PRO W7500 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 4 nm | 6 nm |

| Die Size | 308 mm² | 204 mm² |

| Transistors | Unknown | 13,300 million |

| Base Clock | 1295 MHz | 1500 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 3000 MHz | 1700 MHz |

| Memory | System Shared | 8 GB GDDR6 |

| Memory Bus | System Shared | 128 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | System Dependent | 256.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 2560 | 1792 |

| TMUs | 160 | 112 |

| ROPs | 64 | 64 |

| RT Cores | 40 | 28 |

| Pixel Rate | 192.0 GPixel/s | 108.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 480.0 GTexel/s | 190.4 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 15.36 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 15.36 TFLOPS (1:1) | 24.37 TFLOPS (2:1) |

| TDP | 55 W | 70 W |

| Slot Width | IGP | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | None | None |

| Suggested PSU | Not listed | 250 W |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | Portable Device Dependent | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2023-08-02 |

| Launch MSRP | Not listed | 429 USD |

| Percentile | 50 | 59 |

| Avg Benchmark Score | 0 | 16415 |