AMD Radeon 8060S vs Intel Arc A570M Comparison

# Intel Arc A570M vs AMD Radeon 8060S

The Intel Arc A570M and AMD Radeon 8060S represent two distinct approaches to integrated graphics in portable devices, with benchmark data showing the AMD part holding a commanding lead in the one shared test while the Intel part achieves a slightly higher overall percentile ranking. The Arc A570M, based on the DG2-256 chip with Xe-HPG architecture, posts a Geekbench OpenCL score of 58,239, placing it in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the Radeon 8060S, built on the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, scores 84,626 in the same test but sits at the 87th percentile overall. This apparent contradiction stems from the Radeon’s average benchmark score of 55,757 across multiple tests, which includes a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162 and a Geekbench Vulkan score of 80,483, dragging its aggregate below the Intel part’s single-test average.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8060S wins the only direct head-to-head benchmark available, the Geekbench OpenCL test, by a substantial margin. Its score of 84,626 outperforms the Intel Arc A570M’s 58,239 by 31.2 percent, a delta that places the AMD part firmly ahead in raw compute workloads that leverage OpenCL. The Radeon’s advantage is further reinforced by its Vulkan score of 80,483, which demonstrates strong performance across multiple graphics APIs, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2,162 indicates capable DirectX 12 gaming performance as well. In terms of peak throughput, the Radeon 8060S delivers 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 compute and 14.85 TFLOPS FP16 compute with a 1:1 ratio, while the Arc A570M manages 5.325 TFLOPS FP32 and 10.65 TFLOPS FP16 with a 2:1 ratio, showing the AMD part leads in raw shader throughput. The Radeon also doubles the pixel rate at 185.6 GPixel/s versus 83.20 GPixel/s and nearly triples the texture rate at 464.0 GTexel/s versus 166.4 GTexel/s, indicating advantages in fill-rate-bound scenarios.

The Intel Arc A570M, however, claims the higher overall percentile ranking at 88 versus the Radeon’s 87, which reflects its average benchmark score of 58,239 being more consistent across the tests it has been evaluated in. The Arc’s nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT at 58,392 (0.3 percent ahead), the NVIDIA P102-100 at 58,528 (0.5 percent ahead), and the AMD Radeon RX 5600 OEM at 58,085 (0.3 percent behind), showing the Intel part sits in a tightly clustered performance band. The Radeon 8060S, by contrast, has nearest rivals that include the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698 (0.1 percent behind), the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 at 56,083 (0.6 percent behind), and the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X at 54,828 (1.7 percent ahead), indicating its average score places it within a different competitive segment despite its higher peak scores.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the benchmark data, the AMD Radeon 8060S is the clear choice for users prioritizing raw compute performance in OpenCL workloads, as its 84,626 score represents a 31.2 percent advantage over the Intel Arc A570M in the only directly comparable test. The Radeon’s additional benchmark results — 80,483 in Vulkan and 2,162 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 — suggest it maintains competitiveness across multiple graphics APIs, and its 14.85 TFLOPS FP32 throughput is nearly triple the Arc’s 5.325 TFLOPS, making it the stronger option for compute-intensive applications. The Radeon also benefits from a more advanced 4 nm process node versus the Arc’s 6 nm node, and it features a higher boost clock of 2900 MHz compared to 1300 MHz, along with more shading units (2,560 versus 2,048), more texture mapping units (160 versus 128), and more ray tracing cores (40 versus 16).

The Intel Arc A570M, however, holds a slight edge in overall percentile ranking at 88 versus 87, which may appeal to users who value consistent performance across a broad range of workloads rather than peak compute. Its 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provides a fixed memory allocation, whereas the Radeon 8060S relies on system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth, which could introduce variability in real-world scenarios. The Arc’s lower transistor count of 11,500 million on a smaller 269 mm² die (versus the Radeon’s 308 mm² die) may also translate to different power characteristics, though the Radeon’s 55 W TDP is actually lower than the Arc’s 75 W TDP, suggesting the AMD part achieves its performance lead with greater efficiency. For users who need maximum compute throughput and are comfortable with shared memory configurations, the Radeon 8060S is the data-backed winner; for those who prefer dedicated memory and slightly better overall consistency, the Arc A570M remains viable.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The sole direct comparison available is the Geekbench OpenCL test, where the AMD Radeon 8060S scores 84,626 against the Intel Arc A570M’s 58,239, yielding a delta of -31.2 percent from the Intel part’s perspective. This is a decisive victory for the AMD part, representing a performance gap that would be clearly perceptible in compute-heavy workloads such as rendering, scientific simulation, or machine learning inference that leverage OpenCL. The magnitude of this lead is notable when contextualized against the nearest rivals of each card: the Arc A570M’s closest competitor is the AMD Radeon RX 6950 XT, which sits just 0.3 percent ahead, while the Radeon 8060S’s nearest rival is the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB, which is only 0.1 percent behind. This means the 31.2 percent delta between the two reviewed cards is far larger than the differences between either card and its immediate competitive set, underscoring the Radeon’s significant compute advantage.

The Radeon 8060S’s additional benchmark scores provide further context for its capabilities. Its Geekbench Vulkan score of 80,483 is only slightly lower than its OpenCL score, indicating strong cross-API performance, while its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162 suggests that gaming workloads may also benefit from its architecture. The Intel Arc A570M has no equivalent Vulkan or DX12 benchmark results in the data, so it is impossible to confirm whether its OpenCL deficit extends to other APIs, but its lower FP32 throughput of 5.325 TFLOPS versus 14.85 TFLOPS, combined with its lower texture rate of 166.4 GTexel/s versus 464.0 GTexel/s, implies it would struggle to match the Radeon in most compute scenarios. The Arc does have a higher FP16 peak of 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) relative to its FP32, which could help in mixed-precision workloads, but the Radeon’s 14.85 TFLOPS FP16 with a 1:1 ratio still exceeds it.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher Geekbench OpenCL score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S scores 84,626, while the Intel Arc A570M scores 58,239, giving the AMD part a 31.2 percent advantage in this test.

Q: How do the two GPUs compare in overall percentile ranking?

A: The Intel Arc A570M ranks in the 88th percentile among all GPUs, while the AMD Radeon 8060S ranks in the 87th percentile, despite the Radeon’s higher individual benchmark scores.

Q: What memory configurations do the two GPUs use?

A: The Intel Arc A570M uses 8 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with a 128-bit bus and 224.0 GB/s bandwidth, while the AMD Radeon 8060S uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units and ray tracing cores?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has 2,560 shading units and 40 ray tracing cores, compared to the Intel Arc A570M’s 2,048 shading units and 16 ray tracing cores.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The Intel Arc A570M has a TDP of 75 W, while the AMD Radeon 8060S has a TDP of 55 W, making the AMD part more power-efficient despite its higher performance.

Q: Which GPU has the higher boost clock?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S boosts to 2900 MHz, while the Intel Arc A570M boosts to 1300 MHz.

Architecture Differences

The Intel Arc A570M is built on the DG2-256 chip using Xe-HPG architecture, manufactured on a 6 nm process at TSMC with 11,500 million transistors on a 269 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 42.8 million per mm². It belongs to the Alchemist generation within the Arc 5 Mobile lineup and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The AMD Radeon 8060S, by contrast, uses the Strix Halo chip with RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC with a 308 mm² die size and an unknown transistor count. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation and supports the same API set — DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4 — but its predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, indicating a different lineage. The process node difference (4 nm versus 6 nm) likely contributes to the Radeon’s ability to achieve higher clock speeds and throughput while maintaining a lower TDP, though the Intel part’s smaller die and lower transistor count may offer different manufacturing cost characteristics.

The Radeon 8060S’s memory architecture is fundamentally different, relying on system-shared memory rather than dedicated VRAM, which means its bandwidth is system-dependent rather than fixed. The Arc A570M’s dedicated 8 GB GDDR6 configuration with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth provides predictable memory performance, whereas the Radeon’s shared configuration could vary based on system memory speed and allocation. Both GPUs are integrated into portable devices, with slot width listed as IGP and display outputs described as portable device dependent, but the Radeon has no power connectors while the Arc’s power connector field is null. The Radeon also features a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface versus the Arc’s PCIe 4.0 x8, offering potentially higher bandwidth to system resources, which may partially offset the shared memory penalty.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ across nearly every specification field. The Intel Arc A570M has a base clock of 900 MHz and a boost clock of 1300 MHz, while the AMD Radeon 8060S starts at 1295 MHz base and boosts to 2900 MHz — more than double the Intel part’s boost frequency. The Radeon’s memory speed is listed as system shared, while the Arc uses 1750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective GDDR6 speed. In terms of compute units, the Arc has 2,048 shading units, 128 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 16 ray tracing cores, while the Radeon has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 40 ray tracing cores. Pixel rates are 83.20 GPixel/s for the Arc and 185.6 GPixel/s for the Radeon, and texture rates are 166.4 GTexel/s versus 464.0 GTexel/s respectively. FP32 compute is 5.325 TFLOPS for the Arc and 14.85 TFLOPS for the Radeon, while FP16 is 10.65 TFLOPS (2:1) for the Arc and 14.85 TFLOPS (1:1) for the Radeon.

The TDP figures show the Radeon at 55 W versus the Arc at 75 W, making the AMD part both faster and more power-efficient on paper. The Arc’s bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8, while the Radeon uses PCIe 5.0 x16. The Arc has a release date of 2023-07-31, while the Radeon’s release date is 2025-01-05, indicating a generational gap. The Arc’s transistor density is specified at 42.8M per mm², while the Radeon’s transistor density is not listed, and its transistor count is unknown. The Radeon’s predecessor is listed as Polaris Mobile, while the Arc has no predecessor or successor listed. Neither GPU has a launch MSRP in the data, and both are currently listed as active in production status.