AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 Comparison

The AMD Radeon 8060S and AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 sit on opposite ends of the GPU timeline and design philosophy. The 8060S is a modern integrated graphics solution built for mobility, while the WX 7100 is a professional workstation card from the Polaris era, now end-of-life. The benchmark database shows a clear performance hierarchy, but the choice is not simply about raw speed. It is about what you need the GPU to do, where you need it to run, and which software environment you are targeting.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 8060S wins every recorded head-to-head benchmark. In Geekbench OpenCL, the 8060S scores 84,626 against the WX 7100's 40,148, a delta of 110.8%. In Geekbench Vulkan, the 8060S posts 80,483 versus 39,683, a 102.8% advantage. Those are not marginal gains; they represent more than double the compute throughput in both API tests. If your workload is compute-heavy, whether for rendering, simulation, or machine learning inference, the 8060S is the definitive winner in this matchup.

The database also places the 8060S in a higher overall performance tier. Its average benchmark score is 55,757, which puts it at the 87th percentile of all GPUs. The WX 7100's average is 40,063, sitting at the 82nd percentile. While both are above the median, the 8060S is closer to the top of the stack. Its nearest rivals include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5080 with an average score of 56,083 (0.6% ahead) and the AMD Radeon RX 6750 GRE 12 GB at 55,698 (0.1% behind). The WX 7100, by contrast, trades blows with the AMD Radeon Pro 580 (40,318, 0.6% ahead) and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 (40,377, 0.8% ahead). This means the 8060S is competing with modern high-end desktop parts, while the WX 7100 is matched against mid-range mobile and older workstation cards.

Where the WX 7100 does not win on raw performance, it wins on specialization and longevity in legacy environments. It supports DirectX 12 (12_0) and Vulkan 1.3, which covers a broad range of professional applications. It also has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus, delivering 224.0 GB/s of bandwidth. That is a fixed, isolated memory pool, which can be an advantage in applications that do not tolerate shared memory contention. The 8060S uses system shared memory, so its bandwidth is system dependent. For single-application professional use, the WX 7100's dedicated memory is predictable. For multitasking or workloads that can use the full system memory pool, the 8060S is more flexible.

The Verdict

Pick the AMD Radeon 8060S if your priority is compute performance in OpenCL or Vulkan. The data shows it is more than double the speed of the WX 7100 in both tests. It is also a current, active product with a 4 nm process node and RDNA 3.5 architecture, which suggests better driver support and future software optimization. The 8060S is also an integrated GPU, so it requires no power connector and has a 55 W TDP, making it suitable for compact or low-power systems.

Pick the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 if you specifically need a single-slot, dedicated workstation GPU with fixed memory and a 6-pin power connector. It has a 130 W TDP and a suggested PSU of 300 W. It is end-of-life, but its GCN 4.0 architecture is well established in professional software. If your application relies on Metal (the WX 7100 scores 40,357 in Geekbench Metal, a test the 8060S does not have recorded), or if you require 4x DisplayPort 1.4a outputs for multi-monitor professional setups, the WX 7100 is the only option here. The 8060S's display outputs are listed as portable device dependent, so it offers no fixed multi-display configuration.

For most users, the 8060S is the better GPU. It wins every shared benchmark, has a higher average score, and is built on a modern architecture. The WX 7100 is a specialized tool for legacy professional environments, not a general-purpose performer.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records two direct comparisons between these GPUs, and both are decisive wins for the 8060S.

In Geekbench OpenCL, the 8060S scores 84,626. The WX 7100 scores 40,148. The delta is 110.8%, meaning the 8060S is more than double the WX 7100's OpenCL performance. OpenCL is widely used in scientific computing, video editing, and rendering, so this gap translates directly to faster completion times in those tasks. The 8060S's FP32 throughput is 14.85 TFLOPS, compared to the WX 7100's 5.728 TFLOPS. That is a 2.6x raw compute advantage, which aligns with the benchmark delta.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the 8060S scores 80,483. The WX 7100 scores 39,683. The delta is 102.8%, again more than double. Vulkan is used in games and increasingly in professional applications for low-level GPU access. The 8060S's Vulkan support is version 1.4, while the WX 7100 supports 1.3. The newer API version on the 8060S allows for better performance in modern Vulkan workloads.

The 8060S also has a separate benchmark, 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, where it scores 2,162. The WX 7100 has no recorded score for this test. This suggests the 8060S is the only one of the two that can handle modern DX12 gaming or DX12-based professional tests. The 8060S supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), while the WX 7100 only reaches DirectX 12 (12_0). That difference means the 8060S supports features like ray tracing (40 RT cores) and mesh shaders, which the WX 7100 lacks entirely.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S has an average benchmark score of 55,757, while the AMD Radeon Pro WX 7100 has an average of 40,063.

Q: Does the WX 7100 outperform the 8060S in any recorded benchmark?

A: No. The database records two head-to-head tests (Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan), and the 8060S wins both. The WX 7100 does have a Geekbench Metal score of 40,357, but there is no Metal score recorded for the 8060S to compare against.

Q: What is the performance percentile of each GPU?

A: The 8060S is at the 87th percentile of all GPUs, and the WX 7100 is at the 82nd percentile.

Q: Can the WX 7100 run ray tracing workloads?

A: No. The WX 7100 has no RT cores listed, and its DirectX support is 12 (12_0), which does not include the ray tracing features of DirectX 12 Ultimate. The 8060S has 40 RT cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2).

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The 8060S has 2,560 shading units, while the WX 7100 has 2,304. The 8060S also has more texture mapping units (160 vs. 144) and more ROPs (64 vs. 32).

Q: What is the difference in memory architecture?

A: The 8060S uses system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth, while the WX 7100 has 8 GB of dedicated GDDR5 memory on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Architecture Differences

The 8060S is built on the Strix Halo chip using RDNA 3.5 architecture, manufactured on a 4 nm process at TSMC. It belongs to the Navi Mobile (RX 8000M) generation. The chip has a die size of 308 mm². Transistor count is listed as unknown. This architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It includes 40 ray tracing cores, which is a major feature absent from the WX 7100. The 8060S is an integrated GPU (IGP) with a slot width of "IGP" and no power connectors.

The WX 7100 is built on the Ellesmere chip using GCN 4.0 architecture, manufactured on a 14 nm process at GlobalFoundries. It is part of the Radeon Pro Polaris (WX x100) generation. The die size is 232 mm², with 5,700 million transistors and a transistor density of 24.6M per mm². It supports DirectX 12 (12_0), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.3. It has no RT cores or tensor cores. The WX 7100 is a single-slot card, 241 mm long (9.5 inches) and 112 mm high (4.4 inches).

These are fundamentally different designs. The 8060S is a modern, power-efficient integrated solution with ray tracing support, while the WX 7100 is a legacy discrete workstation card without ray tracing. The 8060S's RDNA 3.5 architecture is designed for high throughput per watt, and its 55 W TDP reflects that. The WX 7100's GCN 4.0 architecture is older and less efficient, which is why it requires 130 W and a 6-pin power connector.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ in nearly every measurable specification.

• Process node: 8060S is 4 nm (TSMC); WX 7100 is 14 nm (GlobalFoundries).
• Die size: 8060S is 308 mm²; WX 7100 is 232 mm².
• Transistors: 8060S is unknown; WX 7100 is 5,700 million.
• Base clock: 8060S is 1295 MHz; WX 7100 is 1188 MHz.
• Boost clock: 8060S is 2900 MHz; WX 7100 is 1243 MHz.
• Memory: 8060S uses system shared memory; WX 7100 has 8 GB GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 224.0 GB/s bandwidth.
• Shading units: 8060S has 2,560; WX 7100 has 2,304.
• Texture mapping units: 8060S has 160; WX 7100 has 144.
• Render output units: 8060S has 64; WX 7100 has 32.
• Ray tracing cores: 8060S has 40; WX 7100 has none.
• Pixel rate: 8060S is 185.6 GPixel/s; WX 7100 is 39.78 GPixel/s.
• Texture rate: 8060S is 464.0 GTexel/s; WX 7100 is 179.0 GTexel/s.
• FP32 performance: 8060S is 14.85 TFLOPS; WX 7100 is 5.728 TFLOPS.
• TDP: 8060S is 55 W; WX 7100 is 130 W.
• Power connectors: 8060S has none; WX 7100 has 1x 6-pin.
• Suggested PSU: 8060S has none listed; WX 7100 is 300 W.
• Bus interface: 8060S is PCIe 5.0 x16; WX 7100 is PCIe 3.0 x16.
• Display outputs: 8060S is portable device dependent; WX 7100 has 4x DisplayPort 1.4a.
• DirectX support: 8060S is 12 Ultimate (12_2); WX 7100 is 12 (12_0).
• Vulkan support: 8060S is 1.4; WX 7100 is 1.3.
• Production status: 8060S is active; WX 7100 is end-of-life.
• Release date: 8060S is January 5, 2025; WX 7100 is November 9, 2016.
• Launch MSRP: The WX 7100 launched at 799 USD; the 8060S has no recorded launch MSRP.

The 8060S is faster, newer, more efficient, and more feature-rich. The WX 7100 offers dedicated memory and fixed display outputs, but its architecture is a decade old. The database data points to one conclusion: the 8060S is the modern choice for nearly all workloads, while the WX 7100 remains only for legacy workstation deployments.