AMD Radeon 8060S vs AMD Radeon Pro W5700X Comparison

The AMD Radeon 8060S and AMD Radeon Pro W5700X occupy entirely different corners of the GPU landscape, and the benchmark data reflects that split clearly. The 8060S, an integrated part of the Strix Halo platform, posts an average benchmark score of 55,757, while the Pro W5700X, a dedicated workstation card for Apple systems, averages 54,828. That overall gap is just 1.7 percent, placing both in the 87th percentile of all GPUs, yet their individual test results and architectural foundations tell a story of two devices designed for different workloads and environments.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon 8060S wins decisively in both head-to-head compute tests. In Geekbench OpenCL, it scores 84,626 against the Pro W5700X’s 43,810, a 93.2 percent advantage. In Geekbench Vulkan, it scores 80,483 versus 45,246, a 77.9 percent lead. These are not marginal differences; they represent a near-doubling of raw compute throughput in one case. The 8060S also holds a unique 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 result of 2,162, a test the Pro W5700X does not appear in the data for. This makes the 8060S the clear pick for any workload that stresses general compute, modern graphics APIs, or ray-traced content.

The Pro W5700X’s wins are narrower and more specialized. Its only unique benchmark is Geekbench Metal, where it scores 75,427. This matters because the Pro W5700X is built for Apple’s ecosystem, and Metal is the native graphics API on that platform. In OpenCL and Vulkan, it falls far behind, but the data suggests it was never designed to lead those tests. Its 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory with 448.0 GB/s of bandwidth also gives it a structural advantage in memory-heavy tasks, even if the benchmark scores do not directly measure that. For a Mac Pro user running Metal-optimized professional applications, the Pro W5700X holds its ground in ways that raw OpenCL numbers do not capture.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs are separated by four generations of RDNA architecture. The Radeon 8060S uses RDNA 3.5 on a 4 nm TSMC process, while the Pro W5700X uses the original RDNA 1.0 on a 7 nm TSMC process. The die sizes tell part of the story: the 8060S measures 308 mm², larger than the Pro W5700X’s 251 mm², but the newer process allows for far greater efficiency. The 8060S has a 55 W TDP, while the Pro W5700X draws 205 W and requires a 550 W suggested power supply. That is a 150 W difference in thermal design power, and it reflects the 8060S’s integrated nature versus the Pro W5700X’s quad-slot, 305 mm add-in card design.

Core configuration is identical in shading units, texture mapping units, and render output units: both have 2,560 shaders, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The key architectural divergence is in ray tracing. The 8060S includes 40 dedicated ray accelerators, while the Pro W5700X has none listed. This explains why the 8060S can handle DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) while the Pro W5700X is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1). Clock speeds also differ significantly: the 8060S boosts to 2,900 MHz, the Pro W5700X to 2,040 MHz. That 860 MHz boost advantage, combined with the newer architecture, drives the 8060S’s higher pixel rate of 185.6 GPixel/s versus 130.6 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 464.0 GTexel/s versus 326.4 GTexel/s.

Memory is another fundamental split. The 8060S uses system-shared memory with bandwidth described as system-dependent, meaning it borrows from the host’s RAM. The Pro W5700X has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s of dedicated bandwidth. The Pro W5700X’s FP16 throughput is 20.89 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, double its FP32 rate of 10.44 TFLOPS. The 8060S runs FP16 at 14.85 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, matching its FP32 output. This makes the Pro W5700X potentially faster in FP16-heavy workloads despite its older architecture.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The AMD Radeon 8060S averages 55,757 across all benchmarks, which is 1.7 percent higher than the AMD Radeon Pro W5700X’s 54,828. Both sit in the 87th percentile of all GPUs.

Q: How large is the performance gap in OpenCL?

A: The 8060S scores 84,626 in Geekbench OpenCL, while the Pro W5700X scores 43,810. This gives the 8060S a 93.2 percent advantage, nearly doubling the Pro W5700X’s output.

Q: Does the Pro W5700X win any benchmark?

A: The Pro W5700X has one unique result: a Geekbench Metal score of 75,427. The 8060S does not have a recorded Metal score, so this is not a direct head-to-head comparison, but it shows the Pro W5700X’s strength in Apple’s native API.

Q: What are the memory configurations?

A: The 8060S uses system-shared memory with bandwidth dependent on the host system. The Pro W5700X has 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 448.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU supports ray tracing?

A: The 8060S has 40 ray accelerators and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Pro W5700X has no ray accelerators listed and is limited to DirectX 12 (12_1).

Q: How do their power requirements differ?

A: The 8060S has a 55 W TDP with no power connectors, as it is an integrated part. The Pro W5700X has a 205 W TDP and requires a 550 W suggested power supply.

Specification Differences

The specification sheets diverge on nearly every major point except the core counts. Both GPUs use 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, but that is where the similarities end. The 8060S runs on a 4 nm process with a 308 mm² die, while the Pro W5700X uses a 7 nm process with a 251 mm² die and 10,300 million transistors at a density of 41.0M per mm². The 8060S’s transistor count is listed as unknown, so no direct comparison is possible there.

Clock speeds favor the 8060S: a 1,295 MHz base and 2,900 MHz boost versus the Pro W5700X’s 1,243 MHz base and 2,040 MHz boost. The Pro W5700X’s memory runs at 1,750 MHz with 14 Gbps effective, while the 8060S’s memory is system-shared. The 8060S has 40 ray accelerators; the Pro W5700X has none. The 8060S produces 14.85 TFLOPS of FP32 and FP16, while the Pro W5700X produces 10.44 TFLOPS of FP32 and 20.89 TFLOPS of FP16. Pixel rate is 185.6 GPixel/s for the 8060S versus 130.6 GPixel/s for the Pro W5700X, and texture rate is 464.0 GTexel/s versus 326.4 GTexel/s.

Power and physical design could not be more different. The 8060S is an IGP with a 55 W TDP, no power connectors, and a PCIe 5.0 x16 interface. The Pro W5700X is a quad-slot card measuring 305 mm, with a 205 W TDP, a 550 W suggested power supply, and an Apple MPX bus interface. Display outputs also differ: the 8060S uses portable-device-dependent outputs, while the Pro W5700X offers 1x HDMI 2.0b and 4x Thunderbolt. The Pro W5700X has a launch MSRP of 999 USD; the 8060S has no listed launch MSRP.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two shared benchmark results show a consistent and substantial lead for the 8060S. In Geekbench OpenCL, the 8060S scores 84,626 versus the Pro W5700X’s 43,810. The 93.2 percent delta is the largest margin in either direction across all head-to-head data. In Geekbench Vulkan, the 8060S scores 80,483 versus 45,246, a 77.9 percent advantage. These results align with the architectural differences: the 8060S’s 2,900 MHz boost clock and RDNA 3.5 architecture deliver roughly double the compute throughput in these cross-platform APIs.

The Pro W5700X’s closest comparable result is its Geekbench Metal score of 75,427, which is not part of the head-to-head set because the 8060S has no Metal benchmark. However, that number is telling. It sits closer to the 8060S’s Vulkan score of 80,483 than to its own Vulkan score of 45,246. This suggests the Pro W5700X performs better under Metal than under Vulkan, likely due to driver optimization for Apple’s ecosystem. In the rivalry data, the 8060S is listed as 1.7 percent ahead of the Pro W5700X in average score, while the Pro W5700X is listed as 1.7 percent behind the 8060S. The direction and magnitude match, confirming the overall edge belongs to the 8060S.

The 8060S also has a 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 2,162, a modern ray-tracing test. The Pro W5700X has no equivalent result, which is consistent with its lack of ray accelerators and DirectX 12_1 support. This benchmark gap is qualitative but significant: the 8060S can run current DX12 Ultimate titles with ray tracing, while the Pro W5700X cannot.

The Verdict

The data points to a clear split by use case. The AMD Radeon 8060S is the faster GPU in every directly comparable benchmark, with a 93.2 percent OpenCL lead and a 77.9 percent Vulkan lead. It also carries the only ray-tracing hardware and a modern DirectX 12 Ultimate feature set. Any user prioritizing raw compute, modern gaming APIs, or ray-traced workloads should choose the 8060S without hesitation.

The AMD Radeon Pro W5700X is not without merit, but its strengths are narrower. Its 16 GB of dedicated GDDR6 memory and 448.0 GB/s bandwidth are fixed and predictable, unlike the 8060S’s system-dependent shared memory. Its Geekbench Metal score of 75,427 indicates solid performance in Apple’s native API, and its 20.89 TFLOPS FP16 throughput is higher than the 8060S’s 14.85 TFLOPS, which matters for FP16-heavy professional workloads. It also carries a 999 USD launch MSRP, though that figure reflects its 2019 release date.

The verdict from the data is that the 8060S is the superior all-around performer, especially for anyone using OpenCL, Vulkan, or DX12 Ultimate. The Pro W5700X remains relevant only for Mac Pro users who need dedicated memory, Metal optimization, and a quad-slot form factor. For everyone else, the 8060S’s combination of higher clock speeds, newer architecture, and ray-tracing support makes it the stronger choice. The Pro W5700X is end-of-life, while the 8060S is active, and that status aligns with their respective performance profiles.