GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon 780M

CORE STATE Phoenix

VRAM System Shared

CLOCK SPEED 2700 MHz

TDP 15 W

BUS WIDTH System Shared

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0

PROCESS 4 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2023

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

GeForce RTX 3070

CORE STATE GA104

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1725 MHz

TDP 220 W

BUS WIDTH 256 bit

ARCHITECTURE Ampere

PROCESS 8 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2020

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12

480

3,162

geekbench_opencl

18,602

112,783

geekbench_vulkan

33,683

21,022

passmark_directx_10

N/A

150

passmark_directx_11

N/A

182

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

247

passmark_g2d

N/A

1,001

passmark_g3d

N/A

22,214

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

11,195

Analysis: AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

If analyzing NVIDIA RTX 3070 graphics card against the AMD Radeon 780M card from AMD, the performance margin grows clearly visible. NVIDIA RTX 3070 graphics card holds the crown in essentially all scenario we executed. The margin is notable sufficiently to affect practical gaming performance. Users can observe enhanced performance. This conclusion is obvious.

The video memory edge of NVIDIA RTX 3070 graphics card becomes particularly important at increased resolutions. Demanding scenarios consumes notable VRAM, and NVIDIA RTX 3070 graphics card has greater capability. The leads into smoother gameplay in memory-intensive titles. Next-gen titles can only require additional graphics memory. This superiority grows over time.

At the end of the day: NVIDIA RTX 3070 graphics card secures this comparison decisively. Consumers seeking visual capability would seriously choose NVIDIA RTX 3070 graphics card over the AMD Radeon 780M card from AMD. This test results validates this assessment. Your games will perform substantially more fluidly. This is a clear winner in this segment.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

780M

RTX 3070

Core Specs

Shading Units

768

5,888 +666.7%

Shaders

768

5,888 +666.7%

TMUs

184 +283.3%

ROPs

96 +200.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

800 MHz

1500 MHz

Boost Clock

2700 MHz

1725 MHz

Memory Clock

System Shared

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

System Shared

8 GB

VRAM (MB)

—

8,192

Memory Type

System Shared

GDDR6

Memory Bus

System Shared

256 bit

Bandwidth

System Dependent

448.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

128 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

4 MB

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

86.40 GPixel/s

165.6 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

129.6 GTexel/s

317.4 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

8.294 TFLOPS

20.31 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

518.4 GFLOPS (1:16)

317.4 GFLOPS (1:64)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

16.59 TFLOPS (2:1)

20.31 TFLOPS (1:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

46 +283.3%

Tensor Cores

—

184

Power

TDP

15 W

220 W

TDP (W)

220 +1366.7%

Suggested PSU

—

550 W

Power Connectors

None

1x 12-pin

Architecture

RDNA 3.0

Ampere

GPU Name

Phoenix

GA104

Generation

Navi III IGP (Phoenix Mobile)

GeForce 30

Process Size

4 nm

8 nm

Transistors

25,390 million

17,400 million

Die Size

178 mm²

392 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Samsung

Density

142.6M / mm²

44.4M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

8.6

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Dual-slot

Length

—

242 mm 9.5 inches

Height

—

112 mm 4.4 inches

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

1x HDMI 2.13x DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 4.0 x16

Other

Launch Price

—

499 USD

Production

Active

End-of-life

Predecessor

Navi II IGP

GeForce 20

Successor

Navi III IGP

GeForce 40

View Radeon 780M Details View GeForce RTX 3070 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon 780M

GeForce RTX 3070

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons