GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 780M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2900 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

GeForce GT 1010

CORE STATE GP108
VRAM 2 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1468 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Pascal
nm
PROCESS 14 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
480
N/A
geekbench_opencl
18,602
6,698
geekbench_vulkan
33,683
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010

Reviewing the test results for AMD Radeon 780M from AMD and NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 by NVIDIA, a definite story unfolds. AMD Radeon 780M from AMD consistently provides stronger FPS in our analysis. This speed advantage spans from considerable to remarkable depending on the given scenario. Such dependability points to underlying design advantages. Buyers valuing rendering performance will take note.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 by NVIDIA has difficulty to match AMD Radeon 780M from AMD's raw performance. For budget users, NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 by NVIDIA can still represent acceptable performance, however buyers demanding top-tier performance should gravitate toward AMD Radeon 780M from AMD. This benchmark delta is too notable to dismiss. Heavy workloads specifically reveal this margin. The investment returns rewards in performance.

This VRAM advantage of AMD Radeon 780M from AMD gets progressively important at demanding quality levels. 4K scenarios requires considerable memory, and AMD Radeon 780M from AMD offers additional capacity. This leads into enhanced frame rates in demanding workloads. Modern games might increasingly need greater graphics memory. This benefit grows over time.

NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 by NVIDIA isn't written off altogether, but its performance deficit against AMD Radeon 780M from AMD is challenging to dismiss. In price-aware builders, NVIDIA GeForce GT 1010 by NVIDIA can still make a choice when its lower price accounts for its lower frame rates. However, when raw rendering power, AMD Radeon 780M from AMD stands as the undisputed victor. The assessment is straightforward. Capability chasers would gravitate toward AMD Radeon 780M from AMD.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
780M
GT 1010
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
256 -66.7%
Shaders
768
256 -66.7%
TMUs
48
16 -66.7%
ROPs
32
8 -75.0%
Compute Units
12
SM Count
2
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
1228 MHz
Boost Clock
2900 MHz
1468 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1502 MHz 6 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
2 GB
VRAM (MB)
2,048
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
48.06 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
16 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
256 KB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
92.80 GPixel/s
11.74 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
139.2 GTexel/s
23.49 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS
751.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
556.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
31.32 GFLOPS (1:24)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
8.909 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
Power
TDP
15 W
30 W
TDP (W)
15
30 +100.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Pascal
GPU Name
Phoenix
GP108
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
GeForce 10
Process Size
4 nm
14 nm
Transistors
25,390 million
1,800 million
Die Size
178 mm²
74 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
142.6M / mm²
24.3M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
6.1
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
147 mm 5.8 inches
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
1x DVI1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x4
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
GeForce 900
Successor
Navi III IGP
GeForce 20
View Radeon 780M Details View GeForce GT 1010 Details