AMD Radeon 760M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

# NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER vs AMD Radeon 760M

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER and AMD Radeon 760M occupy opposite ends of the GPU spectrum, and the benchmark data reflects that chasm. In the single shared benchmark test—3DMark Steel Nomad DX12—the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, while the Radeon 760M scores 400. This represents a delta of 1467.4% in favor of the NVIDIA card. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER sits in the 36th percentile of all GPUs, with an average benchmark score of 6270, while the Radeon 760M sits in the 35th percentile with an average score of 6019 across all its benchmark tests. Despite the massive single-test gap, both cards reside near the same percentile ranking, which is a statistical artifact of the vastly different benchmark suites each card was tested against.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The only direct head-to-head comparison available is the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, and the result is decisive. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers a score of 6269.5, while the Radeon 760M manages just 400. The delta of 1467.4% means the NVIDIA card outperforms the AMD integrated graphics by a factor of approximately 15.7x in this workload. This is not a close contest; the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a discrete enthusiast-class GPU designed for high-end rendering, while the Radeon 760M is an integrated graphics processor (IGP) embedded in AMD's Phoenix APU. The 512 shading units of the Radeon 760M are dwarfed by the 8960 shading units of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER—a 17.5x difference that maps almost directly onto the performance gap.

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals in the database are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an identical average score of 6270 (0% delta), the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 (0.8% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 (0.2% behind). These rivals are all within 1% of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's average score, indicating that its performance level is tightly clustered in this segment. For the Radeon 760M, its nearest rivals include the AMD Radeon RX 6400 at 6001 (0.3% ahead), the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M at 6000 (0.3% ahead), and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000 at 6049 (0.5% behind). The Radeon 760M's average score of 6019 places it in a much lower performance tier, yet its percentile ranking of 35 is nearly identical to the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 36th percentile—a consequence of the different benchmark distributions each card is measured against.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins the sole head-to-head benchmark, and it wins by a landslide. This card is built for demanding DX12 workloads, as evidenced by its 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5. Its pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s and texture rate of 686.6 GTexel/s are orders of magnitude beyond what the Radeon 760M can achieve—the AMD IGP manages only 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s. For gaming at high resolutions, ray tracing, or compute-heavy tasks, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice. It also offers 16 GB of dedicated GDDR7 memory with 896.0 GB/s of bandwidth, ensuring that large textures and complex scenes do not bottleneck the GPU.

The Radeon 760M, however, has its own set of strengths that are not captured in the head-to-head data. It is an IGP with a 15 W TDP, meaning it consumes a fraction of the power of the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's 350 W TDP. It also benefits from system-shared memory, which allows it to draw on the host system's RAM as needed, though bandwidth is "System Dependent" and cannot match dedicated VRAM. In the broader benchmark suite, the Radeon 760M shows respectable compute performance: its Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 and Vulkan score of 30336 indicate that it can handle general-purpose GPU workloads and light gaming. Its Passmark G3D score of 5310 and G2D score of 890 further suggest it is capable of basic 2D and 3D acceleration, making it suitable for office tasks, media playback, and casual gaming—all without a discrete GPU. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has only one benchmark score in the database (6269.5), while the Radeon 760M has ten scores, reflecting that the IGP is often tested across a range of synthetic workloads where it can demonstrate its versatility.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different architectural generations and are fabricated on different process nodes. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses NVIDIA's Blackwell 2.0 architecture on a 5 nm TSMC process, while the Radeon 760M uses AMD's RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 4 nm TSMC process. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built around the GB203 chip, which contains 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 120.6 million per mm². The Radeon 760M uses the Phoenix chip, with 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, giving a higher transistor density of 142.6 million per mm² despite being a much smaller and simpler chip.

The core configurations differ dramatically. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, 280 texture mapping units (TMUs), and 96 raster output units (ROPs). It also includes 70 dedicated ray tracing cores and 280 tensor cores, which are absent from the Radeon 760M's specification sheet (the tensor core field is null). The Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, 16 ROPs, and 8 ray tracing cores. The NVIDIA card's FP32 compute throughput is 43.94 TFLOPS, while the AMD card manages 5.323 TFLOPS—an 8.3x difference. Both cards support FP16 at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, meaning they do not use dedicated half-rate FP16 paths.

Clock speeds tell a different story. The Radeon 760M has a lower base clock of 800 MHz but boosts to 2599 MHz, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a base clock of 2295 MHz and boosts to 2452 MHz. The AMD IGP's high boost clock partially compensates for its fewer cores, but the sheer core-count disparity remains insurmountable. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER's memory subsystem is dedicated GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus, while the Radeon 760M relies on system-shared memory with no fixed bus width or bandwidth. The NVIDIA card also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, whereas the AMD IGP uses PCIe 4.0 x8.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU is faster in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scores 6269.5, which is 1467.4% higher than the AMD Radeon 760M's score of 400.

Q: Do both GPUs support the same DirectX version?

A: Yes, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), along with OpenGL 4.6 and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two cards?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 350 W, while the Radeon 760M has a TDP of 15 W, making the AMD IGP far more power-efficient.

Q: How do their memory configurations compare?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth. The Radeon 760M uses system-shared memory with system-dependent bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8960 shading units, whereas the Radeon 760M has 512—a 17.5x difference.

Q: Are there any benchmark tests where the Radeon 760M is competitive?

A: The Radeon 760M has no wins in the head-to-head comparison. However, its Geekbench OpenCL score of 20255 and Vulkan score of 30336 show it can handle compute and light graphics workloads, though no direct comparison with the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER exists for those tests.

Specification Differences

| Specification | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER | AMD Radeon 760M |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Blackwell 2.0 | RDNA 3.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 4 nm |

| Chip | GB203 | Phoenix |

| Transistors | 45,600 million | 25,390 million |

| Die Size | 378 mm² | 178 mm² |

| Base Clock | 2295 MHz | 800 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2452 MHz | 2599 MHz |

| Memory Size | 16 GB | System Shared |

| Memory Type | GDDR7 | System Shared |

| Memory Bus Width | 256 bit | System Shared |

| Memory Bandwidth | 896.0 GB/s | System Dependent |

| Shading Units | 8960 | 512 |

| TMUs | 280 | 32 |

| ROPs | 96 | 16 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 70 | 8 |

| Tensor Cores | 280 | None |

| Pixel Rate | 235.4 GPixel/s | 41.58 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 686.6 GTexel/s | 83.17 GTexel/s |

| FP32 Performance | 43.94 TFLOPS | 5.323 TFLOPS |

| TDP | 350 W | 15 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | IGP |

| Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin | None |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 5.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b | Motherboard Dependent |

| Release Date | 2025-12-31 | 2024-01-30 |

| Launch MSRP | 749 USD | None |

| Dimensions | 304 mm x 137 mm x 48 mm | Not specified |

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a 304 mm dual-slot card requiring a 16-pin power connector, while the Radeon 760M is an IGP with no standalone dimensions, power connectors, or display outputs of its own—it relies entirely on the host motherboard. The NVIDIA card's launch MSRP is 749 USD, while the AMD IGP has no listed MSRP. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also supports PCIe 5.0 x16, doubling the interface bandwidth of the Radeon 760M's PCIe 4.0 x8 link.