AMD Radeon 760M vs Intel Arc G3 Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a stark contrast between the two integrated GPUs. The AMD Radeon 760M has a full suite of benchmark results, while the Intel Arc G3 currently has no recorded scores in the database. This makes direct numerical comparison impossible, but the existing data for the AMD part provides a clear reference point.

The AMD Radeon 760M delivers an average benchmark score of 6019 across all recorded tests. Its percentile rank sits at 35, meaning it outperforms roughly a third of all GPUs in the database. The strongest individual result comes from Geekbench Vulkan, where it scores 30336. The OpenCL result is also substantial at 20255. In 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12, the score drops to 400, reflecting the heavy workload of that test.

PassMark results show varied performance across different DirectX versions. The DirectX 9 score is 65, DirectX 11 is 52, and DirectX 12 is 25. The DirectX 10 score is notably lower at 19. The PassMark G3D score is 5310, while the G2D score is 890. Compute performance registers at 2840 in PassMark GPU Compute.

The nearest rivals in the database for the AMD Radeon 760M are tightly clustered. The AMD Radeon RX 6400 sits 0.3% ahead with an average score of 6001. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 770M also sits 0.3% ahead at 6000. The NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Server is 0.4% ahead at 5996. The NVIDIA Quadro P2000 trails by 0.5% with a score of 6049. These deltas are all within a fraction of a percent, indicating that the AMD Radeon 760M lands in a very competitive band of performance.

The Intel Arc G3 has no benchmark entries, no average score, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile rank is 50, but this is not supported by any measured results. The database records it as having zero wins in head-to-head comparisons, which reflects the absence of data rather than any performance conclusion. The AMD Radeon 760M also has zero wins, as no head-to-head benchmarks exist between the two parts.

Architecture Differences

The two integrated GPUs come from different manufacturers and use fundamentally different designs. The AMD Radeon 760M is built on the Phoenix chip using RDNA 3.0 architecture, part of the Navi III IGP generation. It uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc G3 uses the Panther Lake chip with Xe3-LPG architecture, part of the Arc Graphics-M generation. Intel fabricates this on a 3 nm process at its own foundry.

Transistor counts and die sizes differ sharply. The AMD Radeon 760M contains 25,390 million transistors on a 178 mm² die, giving a transistor density of 142.6 million per square millimeter. The Intel Arc G3 has an unknown transistor count and die size, so no density figure can be calculated.

Clock speeds show different strategies. The AMD Radeon 760M has a base clock of 800 MHz and a boost clock of 2599 MHz. The Intel Arc G3 has a much lower base clock of 300 MHz but a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD part has a higher boost ceiling by 199 MHz.

The execution resources favor the Intel part numerically. The Intel Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, 40 texture mapping units, and 20 render output units. The AMD Radeon 760M has 512 shading units, 32 TMUs, and 16 ROPs. The Intel part also has 10 ray tracing cores versus 8 on the AMD part.

Pixel and texture rates follow the resource counts. The Intel Arc G3 achieves 48.00 GPixel/s and 96.00 GTexel/s. The AMD Radeon 760M achieves 41.58 GPixel/s and 83.17 GTexel/s. The Intel part leads in both metrics.

Floating point performance also favors Intel. The Intel Arc G3 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS for FP32 and 12.29 TFLOPS for FP16, with a 2:1 ratio. The AMD Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS for FP32 and 5.323 TFLOPS for FP16, with a 1:1 ratio. The Intel part has a clear advantage in FP16 throughput.

Power targets differ as well. The AMD Radeon 760M has a TDP of 15 W, while the Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W. Both are integrated GPUs with no power connectors and motherboard or portable-device dependent display outputs. The AMD part uses a PCIe 4.0 x8 bus interface, while the Intel part uses an IGP bus interface.

Both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both have system shared memory with system dependent bandwidth. The release dates are far apart: the AMD Radeon 760M launched on 2024-01-30, while the Intel Arc G3 is dated 2026-05-31.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The Intel Arc G3 has 1280 shading units, while the AMD Radeon 760M has 512. The Intel part has more than double the shading unit count.

Q: What is the FP32 performance difference?

A: The Intel Arc G3 delivers 6.144 TFLOPS of FP32 performance. The AMD Radeon 760M delivers 5.323 TFLOPS. The Intel part has a 0.821 TFLOPS advantage.

Q: How do the boost clocks compare?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has a boost clock of 2599 MHz. The Intel Arc G3 has a boost clock of 2400 MHz. The AMD part boosts 199 MHz higher.

Q: Are there any recorded benchmark scores for the Intel Arc G3?

A: No. The database contains no benchmark entries for the Intel Arc G3. Its average score is recorded as 0, and it has no nearest rivals listed.

Q: What is the process node for each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M uses a 4 nm process at TSMC. The Intel Arc G3 uses a 3 nm process at Intel.

Q: What is the TDP of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 760M has a TDP of 15 W. The Intel Arc G3 has a TDP of 25 W.

Specification Differences

The two GPUs differ on nearly every recorded specification. The process node is 4 nm for AMD and 3 nm for Intel. The transistor count is 25,390 million for AMD and unknown for Intel. The die size is 178 mm² for AMD and unknown for Intel.

Base clocks are 800 MHz for AMD and 300 MHz for Intel. Boost clocks are 2599 MHz for AMD and 2400 MHz for Intel. The memory configuration is system shared for both, with system dependent bandwidth on each.

Shading units are 512 on AMD and 1280 on Intel. TMUs are 32 on AMD and 40 on Intel. ROPs are 16 on AMD and 20 on Intel. Ray tracing cores are 8 on AMD and 10 on Intel.

Pixel rates are 41.58 GPixel/s on AMD and 48.00 GPixel/s on Intel. Texture rates are 83.17 GTexel/s on AMD and 96.00 GTexel/s on Intel. FP32 performance is 5.323 TFLOPS on AMD and 6.144 TFLOPS on Intel. FP16 performance is 5.323 TFLOPS on AMD and 12.29 TFLOPS on Intel, with a 1:1 ratio on AMD and a 2:1 ratio on Intel.

TDP is 15 W on AMD and 25 W on Intel. The bus interface is PCIe 4.0 x8 on AMD and IGP on Intel. Display outputs are motherboard dependent on AMD and portable device dependent on Intel. The release dates are 2024-01-30 for AMD and 2026-05-31 for Intel.

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Radeon 760M wins in the only category with measured data: benchmark scores. It has a full suite of recorded results, including a Geekbench Vulkan score of 30336 and an OpenCL score of 20255. Its average benchmark score of 6019 places it in the 35th percentile of all GPUs. The nearest rivals are all within 0.5% of its average score, showing that it competes effectively with discrete GPUs like the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000.

The AMD Radeon 760M also wins on boost clock, reaching 2599 MHz versus 2400 MHz on the Intel part. It has a lower TDP of 15 W versus 25 W, which is an advantage in power-constrained systems. Its transistor count and die size are known and substantial, while the Intel part has no published figures.

The Intel Arc G3 wins on raw architectural specifications. It has more shading units (1280 versus 512), more TMUs (40 versus 32), more ROPs (20 versus 16), and more ray tracing cores (10 versus 8). It delivers higher pixel rate (48.00 GPixel/s versus 41.58 GPixel/s) and higher texture rate (96.00 GTexel/s versus 83.17 GTexel/s). Its FP32 performance is 6.144 TFLOPS versus 5.323 TFLOPS, and its FP16 performance is 12.29 TFLOPS versus 5.323 TFLOPS, a substantial lead for workloads that use FP16.

The Intel Arc G3 also uses a more advanced 3 nm process node, compared to the 4 nm node on the AMD part. It has a higher TDP of 25 W, which allows for the larger execution resources. The Intel part is newer, with a release date of 2026-05-31 versus 2024-01-30 for AMD.

The practical split is clear. The AMD Radeon 760M is the only one of the two with proven, measured performance. Its benchmark results show it performing at a level comparable to the AMD Radeon RX 6400 and the NVIDIA Quadro P2000, with all deltas under 1%. The Intel Arc G3 has no recorded performance data, so its architectural advantages remain theoretical.

For systems where power efficiency and established performance matter, the AMD Radeon 760M has the data to support its position. For systems where raw compute resources and FP16 throughput are priorities, the Intel Arc G3 presents a stronger specification sheet, though without benchmark confirmation. The Intel part also benefits from a more recent release date and a smaller process node, which may indicate newer design techniques.