GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 740M

CORE STATE Phoenix2
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2800 MHz
TDP 45 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

RTX A400

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1762 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
10,172
22,844
geekbench_vulkan
15,568
22,237
passmark_directx_10
N/A
32
passmark_directx_11
N/A
37
passmark_directx_12
N/A
27
passmark_directx_9
N/A
87
passmark_g2d
N/A
899
passmark_g3d
N/A
5,983
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
2,557

Analysis: AMD Radeon 740M vs NVIDIA RTX A400

If analyzing NVIDIA RTX A400 with AMD AMD Radeon 740M, the benchmark gap gets immediately apparent. NVIDIA RTX A400 claims the crown in essentially most test we conducted. The delta is substantial sufficiently to change practical visual experiences. Players might experience smoother performance. The verdict is clear.

AMD AMD Radeon 740M encounters issues to match NVIDIA RTX A400's pure throughput. For budget consumers, AMD AMD Radeon 740M could nonetheless represent reasonable capability, but buyers demanding premium experience might gravitate toward NVIDIA RTX A400. This benchmark difference is sufficiently large to deny. Intensive games specifically showcase this disparity. The cost difference pays rewards in performance.

When it comes to real-time ray tracing, NVIDIA RTX A400 moves considerably in front of AMD AMD Radeon 740M. The specialized units manage heavy reflection rendering considerably more efficiently. Users looking for next-gen fidelity will strongly consider NVIDIA RTX A400. This real-time ray tracing superiority is considerable. Current titles continually use hardware RT effects.

When all is said and done: NVIDIA RTX A400 secures this showdown clearly. Buyers wanting rendering throughput might certainly select NVIDIA RTX A400 over AMD AMD Radeon 740M. This test data demonstrates this verdict. Your games will perform noticeably faster. It's a obvious winner in this category.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
740M
RTX A400
Core Specs
Shading Units
256
768 +200.0%
Shaders
256
768 +200.0%
TMUs
16
24 +50.0%
ROPs
8
16 +100.0%
Compute Units
4
SM Count
6
Clocks
Base Clock
800 MHz
1417 MHz
Boost Clock
2800 MHz
1762 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
96.00 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
22.40 GPixel/s
28.19 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
44.80 GTexel/s
42.29 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS
2.706 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
179.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
42.29 GFLOPS (1:64)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
2.867 TFLOPS (1:1)
2.706 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
4
6 +50.0%
Tensor Cores
24
Power
TDP
45 W
50 W
TDP (W)
45
50 +11.1%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
Ampere
GPU Name
Phoenix2
GA107
Generation
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
Workstation Ampere (Ax000)
Process Size
4 nm
8 nm
Transistors
20,900 million
8,700 million
Die Size
137 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
Samsung
Density
152.6M / mm²
43.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
8.6
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
163 mm 6.4 inches
Height
69 mm 2.7 inches
Outputs
Motherboard Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
Active
Predecessor
Navi II IGP
Quadro Turing
Successor
Navi III IGP
Workstation Ada
View Radeon 740M Details View RTX A400 Details