AMD Radeon 680M vs Lisuan Tech LX PRO Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The benchmark database contains recorded results for the AMD Radeon 680M across three tests, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no recorded benchmark scores. This absence of data for the LX PRO makes a direct numerical comparison impossible, so the analysis must rely on the 680M’s measured results and the architectural specifications of both parts.

The AMD Radeon 680M achieves an average benchmark score of 15270. Its strongest recorded result comes from Geekbench OpenCL, where it scores 23468. In Geekbench Vulkan, the 680M scores 21965. The 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test yields a score of 378, which is the lowest of the three recorded results. The 680M sits at the 57th percentile among all GPUs in the database, meaning it outperforms a majority of recorded graphics processors.

The nearest rivals to the 680M in the database provide context for its average score. The NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 has an average score of 15283, which is 0.1% higher than the 680M. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 also scores 15290, again 0.1% higher. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 OEM scores 15199, placing it 0.5% lower than the 680M. The AMD Radeon RX 7600 scores 15171, which is 0.7% lower. These narrow deltas indicate that the 680M performs within a tight band around these discrete graphics cards, despite being an integrated graphics processor.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO, by contrast, has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is recorded as 0, and it holds the 50th percentile among all GPUs, a placement that is effectively neutral given the absence of measured data. The head-to-head benchmark section in the database lists zero wins for either product, which reflects the lack of comparable test results rather than any performance equivalence.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Radeon 680M uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture, built on the Rembrandt+ chip, and belongs to the Navi II IGP generation for Rembrandt Mobile. It is fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, with 13,100 million transistors on a die size of 208 mm². This yields a transistor density of 63.0 million transistors per square millimeter. The 680M is an integrated graphics processor, occupying a slot width of IGP, and it relies on system shared memory for both capacity and bandwidth. Its memory clock is listed as system shared, and memory bandwidth is system dependent.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with the 7G105 chip, belonging to the 7G100 generation. It is also fabricated on a 6 nm process at TSMC, but its transistor count and die size are listed as unknown. The LX PRO is a discrete graphics card with a dual-slot form factor. It carries 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a memory clock of 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective, resulting in a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s. This dedicated memory subsystem stands in contrast to the 680M’s shared memory approach.

The compute resources differ substantially. The 680M has 768 shading units, 48 texture mapping units, and 32 raster output units. It also includes 12 ray tracing cores. The LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 texture mapping units, and 96 raster output units. The LX PRO does not list ray tracing cores in its specifications. The pixel rate of the 680M is 70.40 GPixel/s, while the LX PRO reaches 192.0 GPixel/s. The texture rate of the 680M is 105.6 GTexel/s, compared to 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO. The FP32 compute throughput is 3.379 TFLOPS for the 680M and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO. The FP16 throughput is 6.758 TFLOPS for the 680M, with a 2:1 ratio, and 49.15 TFLOPS for the LX PRO, also at 2:1.

The power and interface profiles differ as well. The 680M has a TDP of 50 W and uses no power connectors, while the LX PRO has a TDP of 225 W and requires a single 16-pin power connector. The suggested PSU for the LX PRO is 550 W. The 680M connects via PCIe 4.0 x8, while the LX PRO uses PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs for the 680M are portable device dependent, whereas the LX PRO provides 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. In terms of API support, both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6. The 680M supports Vulkan 1.4, while the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score of the AMD Radeon 680M?

A: The AMD Radeon 680M has an average benchmark score of 15270, placing it at the 57th percentile among all GPUs in the database.

Q: Does the Lisuan Tech LX PRO have any recorded benchmark scores?

A: No, the Lisuan Tech LX PRO has no benchmark entries in the database. Its average benchmark score is listed as 0, and it holds the 50th percentile.

Q: How does the 680M compare to its nearest rivals in the database?

A: The 680M is nearly identical in average score to the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 580 and RTX 2060, both of which are 0.1% higher. The RTX 3050 OEM is 0.5% lower, and the AMD Radeon RX 7600 is 0.7% lower.

Q: What memory configuration does the LX PRO use?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO uses 24 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 192-bit bus, with a bandwidth of 432.0 GB/s and a memory clock of 2250 MHz or 18 Gbps effective.

Q: What is the FP32 compute throughput of each GPU?

A: The AMD Radeon 680M delivers 3.379 TFLOPS of FP32 compute, while the Lisuan Tech LX PRO delivers 24.58 TFLOPS.

Q: Which GPU has a higher pixel rate?

A: The Lisuan Tech LX PRO has a pixel rate of 192.0 GPixel/s, compared to 70.40 GPixel/s for the AMD Radeon 680M.

The Verdict

The data presents a clear split between these two products. The AMD Radeon 680M is an integrated GPU with measured results, showing competitive performance against older discrete cards like the GTX 580 and RTX 2060, while also edging out the RTX 3050 OEM and RX 7600 in average score. Its 57th percentile placement indicates it sits above the median of all recorded GPUs. The 680M is designed for portable devices, with system shared memory, a 50 W TDP, and no power connectors, making it suitable for low-power, integrated environments.

The Lisuan Tech LX PRO is a discrete, dual-slot card with a much larger memory footprint, 24 GB of GDDR6, and significantly higher compute resources. Its FP32 throughput of 24.58 TFLOPS is over seven times that of the 680M, and its texture rate of 384.0 GTexel/s is more than three times higher. The LX PRO also requires a 225 W TDP and a 550 W suggested PSU, reflecting a high-power design intended for standalone installation. However, without any benchmark scores in the database, its actual performance cannot be verified or compared to the 680M’s measured results.

Based strictly on recorded data, the 680M is the only one of the two with proven performance metrics. The LX PRO offers superior specifications on paper, but the absence of benchmark results means those specifications remain unvalidated. Users seeking an integrated graphics solution with known performance should consider the 680M. Users requiring a discrete card with large dedicated memory and high compute throughput may look at the LX PRO, but they should note that its database performance profile is empty.

Specification Differences

The AMD Radeon 680M and Lisuan Tech LX PRO differ across nearly every listed specification. The 680M uses the RDNA 2.0 architecture with a 6 nm process and 13,100 million transistors on a 208 mm² die. The LX PRO uses the TrueGPU architecture with a 6 nm process, but its transistor count and die size are unknown. The 680M has 768 shading units, 48 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, while the LX PRO has 6144 shading units, 192 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The 680M includes 12 ray tracing cores; the LX PRO lists none.

Clocks differ: the 680M has a base clock of 2000 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, while the LX PRO has no recorded base or boost clocks. The 680M uses system shared memory, while the LX PRO has 24 GB of GDDR6 on a 192-bit bus with 432.0 GB/s bandwidth. The 680M’s pixel rate is 70.40 GPixel/s and texture rate is 105.6 GTexel/s, versus 192.0 GPixel/s and 384.0 GTexel/s for the LX PRO. FP32 compute is 3.379 TFLOPS for the 680M and 24.58 TFLOPS for the LX PRO.

Power and physical specifications diverge sharply. The 680M has a 50 W TDP, IGP slot width, no power connectors, and a PCIe 4.0 x8 interface. The LX PRO has a 225 W TDP, dual-slot width, one 16-pin power connector, a 550 W suggested PSU, and a PCIe 4.0 x16 interface. The 680M’s display outputs are portable device dependent, while the LX PRO offers 4x DisplayPort 1.4a. The 680M measures no listed dimensions, while the LX PRO is 248 mm in length, 118 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The 680M supports Vulkan 1.4, the LX PRO supports Vulkan 1.3; both support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and OpenGL 4.6.