GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 680M

CORE STATE Rembrandt+
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2200 MHz
TDP 50 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2023
VS
Intel
GPU

Arc A310

CORE STATE DG2-128
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1750 MHz
TDP 30 W
BUS WIDTH 64 bit
ARCHITECTURE Xe-HPG
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
378
N/A
geekbench_opencl
23,468
30,607
geekbench_vulkan
23,723
28,964
passmark_directx_10
N/A
31
passmark_directx_11
N/A
33
passmark_directx_12
N/A
29
passmark_directx_9
N/A
69
passmark_g2d
N/A
625
passmark_g3d
N/A
5,433
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
2,157

Analysis: AMD Radeon 680M vs Intel Arc A310

For this graphics card comparison, Intel Arc A310 GPU establishes its superiority clearly. Whether you're streaming at high resolutions, Intel Arc A310 GPU consistently surpasses AMD AMD Radeon 680M GPU by significant amounts. The benchmark difference increases notably greater at elevated resolutions. This GPU handles resource-hungry titles with grace. Its architectural improvements are clear.

This graphics memory advantage of Intel Arc A310 GPU turns more relevant at demanding detail settings. 4K scenarios consumes significant video memory, and Intel Arc A310 GPU has more capability. This translates into improved gameplay in VRAM-hungry titles. Upcoming titles should increasingly require more VRAM. This benefit increases over generations.

For ray tracing, Intel Arc A310 GPU moves significantly in front of AMD AMD Radeon 680M GPU. The specialized accelerators execute complex shadow computations more efficiently. Players demanding premium fidelity would seriously consider Intel Arc A310 GPU. This ray tracing superiority is substantial. Modern AAA games progressively use hardware RT capabilities.

When all is said and done: Intel Arc A310 GPU claims this battle obviously. Consumers prioritizing rendering power should certainly consider Intel Arc A310 GPU over AMD AMD Radeon 680M GPU. The benchmark evidence validates this recommendation. The games might perform noticeably smoother. This is a obvious winner in this tier.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
680M
A310
Core Specs
Shading Units
768
768 0.0%
Shaders
768
768 0.0%
TMUs
48
32 -33.3%
ROPs
32
16 -50.0%
Compute Units
12
Execution Units
96
Clocks
Base Clock
2000 MHz
1750 MHz
Boost Clock
2200 MHz
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
1937 MHz 15.5 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
Memory Type
System Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bus
System Shared
64 bit
Bandwidth
System Dependent
124.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
70.40 GPixel/s
28.00 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
105.6 GTexel/s
56.00 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
3.379 TFLOPS
2.688 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
211.2 GFLOPS (1:16)
672.0 GFLOPS (1:4)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
6.758 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.376 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
12
6 -50.0%
XMX Cores
96
Power
TDP
50 W
30 W
TDP (W)
50
30 -40.0%
Suggested PSU
200 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
Xe-HPG
GPU Name
Rembrandt+
DG2-128
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
Alchemist (Arc 3)
Process Size
6 nm
6 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
7,200 million
Die Size
208 mm²
157 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
45.9M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
3.0
Shader Model
6.8
6.6
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
Active
End-of-life
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Xe Graphics
Successor
Navi III IGP
Battlemage
View Radeon 680M Details View Arc A310 Details