GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon 660M

CORE STATE Rembrandt
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 1900 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0
nm
PROCESS 6 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
AMD
RADEON

Radeon 760M

CORE STATE Phoenix
VRAM System Shared
CLOCK SPEED 2599 MHz
TDP 15 W
BUS WIDTH System Shared
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 3.0
nm
PROCESS 4 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2024

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
12,876
20,255
geekbench_vulkan
14,748
30,336
3dmark_3dmark_steel_nomad_dx12
N/A
400
passmark_directx_10
N/A
19
passmark_directx_11
N/A
52
passmark_directx_12
N/A
25
passmark_directx_9
N/A
65
passmark_g2d
N/A
890
passmark_g3d
N/A
5,310
passmark_gpu_compute
N/A
2,840

Analysis: AMD Radeon 660M vs AMD Radeon 760M

For this graphics card showdown, AMD Radeon 760M from AMD establishes its leadership obviously. If you're rendering at 1080p, AMD Radeon 760M from AMD dependably outperforms AMD Radeon 660M by AMD by considerable margins. The performance delta increases particularly greater at higher detail settings. This graphics card manages demanding workloads with grace. Its design advantages are evident.

When it comes to ray tracing, AMD Radeon 760M from AMD leaps even more ahead of AMD Radeon 660M by AMD. The dedicated accelerators execute heavy lighting rendering more smoothly. Gamers wanting modern visuals should certainly favor AMD Radeon 760M from AMD. The real-time ray tracing performance is significant. Next-gen titles more and more leverage ray tracing effects.

For RT, AMD Radeon 760M from AMD jumps considerably forward of AMD Radeon 660M by AMD. The RT cores process intensive global illumination effects significantly more efficiently. Enthusiasts looking for modern graphics will seriously pick AMD Radeon 760M from AMD. The RT advantage is significant. Current releases continually use RT capabilities.

When buyers considering a investment selection, AMD Radeon 760M from AMD comes out as the suggested pick. Its steady performance edge over AMD Radeon 660M by AMD renders it the better purchase for gaming-focused users. Weigh your particular workloads, but the benchmarks leads toward AMD Radeon 760M from AMD. Form an educated determination. The gaming difference is measurable and notable.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
660M
760M
Core Specs
Shading Units
384
512 +33.3%
Shaders
384
512 +33.3%
TMUs
24
32 +33.3%
ROPs
16
16 0.0%
Compute Units
6
8 +33.3%
Clocks
Base Clock
1500 MHz
800 MHz
Boost Clock
1900 MHz
2599 MHz
Memory Clock
System Shared
System Shared
Memory
Memory Size
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Type
System Shared
System Shared
Memory Bus
System Shared
System Shared
Bandwidth
System Dependent
System Dependent
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
128 KB per Array
L2 Cache
2 MB
2 MB
L0 Cache
32 KB per WGP
32 KB per WGP
Performance
Pixel Rate
30.40 GPixel/s
41.58 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
45.60 GTexel/s
83.17 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
1,459.2 GFLOPS
5.323 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
91.20 GFLOPS (1:16)
332.7 GFLOPS (1:16)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
2.918 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.323 TFLOPS (1:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
6
8 +33.3%
Power
TDP
40 W
15 W
TDP (W)
40
15 -62.5%
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
RDNA 3.0
GPU Name
Rembrandt
Phoenix
Generation
Navi II IGP (Rembrandt Mobile)
Navi III IGP (Phoenix)
Process Size
6 nm
4 nm
Transistors
13,100 million
25,390 million
Die Size
208 mm²
178 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
63.0M / mm²
142.6M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.0
2.1
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Motherboard Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 4.0 x8
Other
Production
End-of-life
Active
Predecessor
Vega II IGP
Navi II IGP
Successor
Navi III IGP
View Radeon 660M Details View Radeon 760M Details