AMD Instinct MI350X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results between the AMD Instinct MI350X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The MI350X has no recorded benchmark scores, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a single entry in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test. That score is 6269.5, which rounds to an average benchmark score of 6270. This places the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER at the 36th percentile among all GPUs in the database. Its nearest rivals are the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102 with an identical average score of 6270 and a delta of 0%, the AMD FirePro W600 at 6223 with a delta of 0.8%, the NVIDIA Quadro K620 at 6282 with a delta of -0.2%, and the AMD Radeon R7 M350 at 6327 with a delta of -0.9%. The MI350X sits at the 50th percentile, but with an average benchmark score of 0 and no nearest rivals, it cannot be compared numerically in any workload.

Because the MI350X lacks benchmark entries, the only quantitative comparison available is architectural capability. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER delivers 43.94 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput and 43.94 TFLOPS of FP16 throughput at a 1:1 ratio. The MI350X specifies 72.09 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16, also at a 1:1 ratio. That indicates the MI350X carries a 64% higher raw floating-point throughput figure than the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, though no measured workload confirms this in practice. Texture rate differs as well: the MI350X lists 2,252.8 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, a 3.3x advantage on paper. Pixel rate is effectively zero for the MI350X at 0 MPixel/s, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER manages 235.4 GPixel/s, reflecting their divergent design goals.

Memory bandwidth is another major separation point. The MI350X offers 8.19 TB/s over an 8192-bit bus with HBM3e memory, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER provides 896.0 GB/s over a 256-bit bus with GDDR7. The MI350X has a 9.1x bandwidth advantage in the recorded specifications. Memory capacity differs by a factor of 18: 288 GB on the MI350X versus 16 GB on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. These are not competing segments; the data shows the MI350X is built for capacity and throughput, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is built for conventional rendering workloads with rasterization and ray tracing.

Architecture Differences

The MI350X uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses Blackwell 2.0 on a 5 nm TSMC process. The MI350X chip is labeled MI350 256CU, containing 185,000 million transistors on a 2380 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 77.7M per mm². The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses the GB203 chip with 45,600 million transistors on a 378 mm² die, yielding a density of 120.6M per mm². The MI350X has a much larger physical die but lower transistor density, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER packs transistors more tightly.

Shader resources differ sharply. The MI350X contains 16,384 shading units and 1,024 texture mapping units, with no ROPs listed. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 8,960 shading units, 280 TMUs, and 96 ROPs. The MI350X lacks dedicated ray tracing cores and tensor cores in the recorded data, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores. The MI350X also has no display outputs, no DirectX support, no OpenGL support, and no Vulkan support, all listed as N/A. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, with 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b outputs.

Clock speeds favor the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER in base and boost frequencies. The NVIDIA card runs at 2295 MHz base and 2452 MHz boost, while the MI350X runs at 1000 MHz base and 2200 MHz boost. Memory clocks also differ: the MI350X runs at 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective speed, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective speed. The higher effective memory speed on the NVIDIA card is offset by the far wider bus on the AMD accelerator.

Power and physical configuration diverge completely. The MI350X has a thermal design power of 1000 W, uses an OAM module slot width, has no power connectors, and recommends a 1400 W power supply. Its dimensions are 102 mm in length and 165 mm in width. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a 350 W TDP, a dual-slot design, a single 16-pin power connector, and dimensions of 304 mm in length, 137 mm in height, and 48 mm in width. The MI350X is a compact accelerator module, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a full-length consumer graphics card.

The Verdict

The data clearly separates these two products into different categories. The AMD Instinct MI350X is a compute accelerator with no graphics outputs, no API support, and no benchmark scores in the database. Its specifications prioritize memory capacity, memory bandwidth, and raw floating-point throughput. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER is a consumer graphics card with display outputs, full API support, ray tracing hardware, and a recorded 3DMark Steel Nomad score of 6269.5. The MI350X has a 64% higher FP32 figure, a 3.3x higher texture rate, a 9.1x higher memory bandwidth, and 18x more memory capacity. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has the only measurable performance data, a 36th percentile ranking, and a 0% delta against the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER AD102.

Any user needing display output, DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan support must choose the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, as the MI350X lists none of these features. Any workload requiring large memory footprints or extreme bandwidth, such as large model inference or high-capacity data processing, would favor the MI350X on paper, but no benchmark confirms this. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also carries a launch MSRP of 749 USD, while the MI350X has no recorded launch MSRP. The MI350X targets a different deployment environment, indicated by its OAM module form factor and absence of power connectors, meaning it requires a host system that supplies power through the module interface.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 throughput in the recorded specifications?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350X lists 72.09 TFLOPS of FP32 throughput, compared to 43.94 TFLOPS for the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER.

Q: Does the AMD Instinct MI350X support display outputs?

A: No, the MI350X lists no display outputs, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b.

Q: What is the memory configuration of each product?

A: The MI350X has 288 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has 16 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 256-bit bus with 896.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which product has ray tracing cores?

A: The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER includes 70 RT cores. The AMD Instinct MI350X has no RT cores listed in the database.

Q: What is the recorded benchmark score for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER scored 6269.5 in the 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 test, giving it an average benchmark score of 6270 and a 36th percentile ranking.

Q: What is the process node for each chip?

A: The MI350X uses a 3 nm TSMC process, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses a 5 nm TSMC process.

Where Each One Wins

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins in every measured or feature-based category that involves graphics rendering. It has the only benchmark score in the database, 6269.5 in 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. It has display outputs for direct monitor connection. It includes 70 RT cores and 280 tensor cores, enabling ray tracing and AI-accelerated workloads that the MI350X cannot address due to missing cores and APIs. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a higher base clock of 2295 MHz and boost clock of 2452 MHz, along with a pixel rate of 235.4 GPixel/s, which the MI350X cannot match at 0 MPixel/s.

The AMD Instinct MI350X wins on raw specification counts across compute-oriented fields. Its FP32 figure of 72.09 TFLOPS exceeds the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER by 64%. Its texture rate of 2,252.8 GTexel/s is more than three times higher. Its memory bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s is over nine times higher. Its 288 GB memory capacity is 18 times larger. The MI350X has 16,384 shading units versus 8,960, and 1,024 TMUs versus 280. The MI350X uses a 3 nm process, which is smaller than the 5 nm process on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER, though the NVIDIA chip achieves a higher transistor density at 120.6M per mm² versus 77.7M per mm².

The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER wins on power efficiency in terms of TDP per unit of FP32. It delivers 43.94 TFLOPS at 350 W, while the MI350X delivers 72.09 TFLOPS at 1000 W. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER also has a smaller physical footprint for a desktop context, with dual-slot cooling and a 304 mm length, compared to the MI350X's OAM module format that requires a server chassis. The MI350X has no power connectors, meaning it draws power through the module socket, which is not compatible with consumer power supplies.

Specification Differences

The two products differ in nearly every recorded specification field. The MI350X uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture, while the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER uses Blackwell 2.0. The MI350X is built on a 3 nm process, the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER on 5 nm. Transistor counts are 185,000 million versus 45,600 million. Die size is 2380 mm² versus 378 mm². Transistor density is 77.7M per mm² versus 120.6M per mm².

Base clocks are 1000 MHz versus 2295 MHz. Boost clocks are 2200 MHz versus 2452 MHz. Memory clocks are 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective versus 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective. Memory size is 288 GB versus 16 GB. Memory type is HBM3e versus GDDR7. Bus width is 8192 bit versus 256 bit. Bandwidth is 8.19 TB/s versus 896.0 GB/s.

Shading units number 16,384 versus 8,960. TMUs are 1,024 versus 280. ROPs are 0 versus 96. RT cores are not listed for the MI350X versus 70 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Tensor cores are not listed for the MI350X versus 280 on the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s versus 235.4 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 2,252.8 GTexel/s versus 686.6 GTexel/s. FP32 is 72.09 TFLOPS versus 43.94 TFLOPS. FP16 is 72.09 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 43.94 TFLOPS (1:1).

TDP is 1000 W versus 350 W. Slot width is OAM Module versus dual-slot. Power connectors are none versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU is 1400 W for the MI350X, with none listed for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Both use PCIe 5.0 x16. Display outputs are none versus 1x HDMI 2.1b and 3x DisplayPort 2.1b. DirectX support is N/A versus 12 Ultimate (12_2). OpenGL is N/A versus 4.6. Vulkan is N/A versus 1.4. Dimensions are 102 mm by 165 mm for the MI350X versus 304 mm by 137 mm by 48 mm for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. Release dates are June 11, 2025 for the MI350X and December 31, 2025 for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The production status is null for the MI350X and active for the RTX 5070 Ti SUPER. The RTX 5070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 749 USD; the MI350X has none.