AMD Instinct MI350P vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Instinct MI350P and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile. The MI350P has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of zero, and no nearest rivals listed. Its percentile ranking against all GPUs sits at 50, which is a neutral position indicating that no performance data has been captured for this part.

The RTX 4060 Mobile, by contrast, has a substantial set of recorded measurements. Its Geekbench OpenCL score is 89,420, and its Geekbench Vulkan score is 89,569. In PassMark testing, the GPU delivers a G3D score of 17,469, a GPU compute score of 6,816, a G2D score of 730, and legacy DirectX scores of 216 for DirectX 9, 157 for DirectX 11, 107 for DirectX 10, and 73 for DirectX 12. The average benchmark score across these runs is 22,729, and the GPU sits in the 67th percentile of all GPUs in the database.

Because the MI350P has no scores, any head-to-head comparison must rely on architectural specifications and the known performance tier of the RTX 4060 Mobile. The RTX 4060 Mobile’s nearest rivals in the database include the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 with an average score of 22,895, which is 0.7% higher, the AMD Radeon RX 7700 XT with an average score of 22,549, which is 0.8% lower, the Intel Arc B580 with an average score of 23,021, which is 1.3% higher, and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060 Mobile with an average score of 22,435, which is 1.3% lower. These deltas place the RTX 4060 Mobile in a tightly contested performance band around 22,500 to 23,000 average points.

The MI350P’s theoretical compute figures, however, dwarf the RTX 4060 Mobile’s recorded scores. The MI350P lists FP32 performance of 36.04 TFLOPS and FP16 performance of 36.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio. The RTX 4060 Mobile lists FP32 of 11.61 TFLOPS and FP16 of 11.61 TFLOPS with the same 1:1 ratio. In raw floating-point throughput, the MI350P offers roughly three times the compute capacity. Texture rate further separates the two: the MI350P delivers 1,126.4 GTexel/s versus 181.4 GTexel/s for the RTX 4060 Mobile, a gap of over sixfold. The MI350P’s pixel rate is listed as 0 MPixel/s, whereas the RTX 4060 Mobile outputs 90.72 GPixel/s, indicating that the MI350P has no traditional raster output stage.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from fundamentally different design philosophies. The AMD Instinct MI350P uses CDNA 4.0 architecture, which is optimized for compute and accelerator workloads. The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace architecture, which is designed for general graphics, gaming, and mobile rendering. The MI350P is built on a 3 nm process at TSMC, while the RTX 4060 Mobile uses a 5 nm process, also at TSMC. The MI350P’s die measures 1190 mm², and the RTX 4060 Mobile’s die measures 159 mm². Transistor counts reflect this scale difference: the MI350P contains 73,000 million transistors, and the RTX 4060 Mobile contains 18,900 million. Transistor density tells a different story, with the RTX 4060 Mobile achieving 118.9M transistors per mm² versus 61.3M per mm² for the MI350P, indicating that the smaller chip packs transistors more tightly.

The MI350P uses a chip designated as MI350 128CU, which indicates a large compute unit count. The RTX 4060 Mobile uses the AD107 chip. The MI350P has 8,192 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 0 ROPs. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 3,072 shading units, 96 texture mapping units, and 48 ROPs. The MI350P lists no ray tracing cores and no tensor cores, while the RTX 4060 Mobile includes 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores. The MI350P has no display outputs, and its API support for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan is listed as N/A. The RTX 4060 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and its display outputs are described as portable device dependent.

Memory architecture diverges sharply. The MI350P uses 144 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, yielding 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 4060 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, yielding 256.0 GB/s. The MI350P’s memory clock is 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective data rate, and the RTX 4060 Mobile’s memory clock is also 2000 MHz with 16 Gbps effective data rate. The MI350P’s bandwidth advantage is roughly 32 times that of the RTX 4060 Mobile, which is consistent with its role as a high-throughput accelerator rather than a consumer graphics part.

Where Each One Wins

The data points to a clear split in intended workloads. The MI350P wins in any scenario that demands massive memory capacity, extreme bandwidth, or raw compute throughput. Its 144 GB HBM3e pool and 8.19 TB/s bandwidth suit large-scale data processing, scientific simulation, and machine learning training. Its FP32 and FP16 figures of 36.04 TFLOPS, delivered at a 1:1 ratio, provide high sustained compute for workloads that do not rely on specialized tensor hardware. The MI350P’s texture rate of 1,126.4 GTexel/s and its 512 TMUs indicate a design focused on parallel texture and compute operations rather than pixel output. Its 0 MPixel/s pixel rate and absence of display outputs confirm that this GPU is not intended for rendering to a screen.

The RTX 4060 Mobile wins in traditional graphics and mobile deployment. Its 48 ROPs and 90.72 GPixel/s pixel rate enable real-time rasterization. Its 24 ray tracing cores and 96 tensor cores provide hardware acceleration for ray-traced lighting and AI-based features such as DLSS, which the MI350P cannot offer because it has no equivalent cores. The RTX 4060 Mobile’s 115 W TDP and integrated form factor (IGP slot width, no power connectors) make it suitable for laptops, whereas the MI350P requires a 600 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a 1000 W suggested power supply. The RTX 4060 Mobile also carries a full API stack, including DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4, so it is ready for consumer gaming and workstation graphics software. The MI350P lists no API support, which limits it to compute frameworks rather than graphics applications.

Benchmark percentile data reinforces the RTX 4060 Mobile’s standing. Its 67th percentile ranking against all GPUs shows that it outperforms most recorded parts in the database. The MI350P’s 50th percentile with no scores is not a performance statement; it simply reflects an absence of measurements. The RTX 4060 Mobile’s nearest rival deltas, ranging from 1.3% behind to 1.3% ahead, show that it competes with desktop-class GPUs such as the RTX 2080 and RX 7700 XT despite its mobile designation.

Specification Differences

The two parts differ in nearly every measurable category. The MI350P is AMD’s CDNA 4.0 architecture on a 3 nm node, and the RTX 4060 Mobile is NVIDIA’s Ada Lovelace architecture on a 5 nm node. The MI350P uses the MI350 128CU chip, and the RTX 4060 Mobile uses AD107. Process node, die size, and transistor count all favor the MI350P in absolute terms: 1190 mm² versus 159 mm², and 73,000 million transistors versus 18,900 million. Transistor density favors the RTX 4060 Mobile at 118.9M per mm² versus 61.3M per mm².

Clock speeds differ as well. The MI350P has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The RTX 4060 Mobile has a base clock of 1545 MHz and a boost clock of 1890 MHz. Memory clocks are both listed at 2000 MHz, but the effective data rate is 8 Gbps for the MI350P and 16 Gbps for the RTX 4060 Mobile. Memory size, type, bus width, and bandwidth all favor the MI350P: 144 GB HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s, versus 8 GB GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s.

Compute resources differ by scale. The MI350P has 8,192 shading units, 512 TMUs, and 0 ROPs. The RTX 4060 Mobile has 3,072 shading units, 96 TMUs, and 48 ROPs. The MI350P has no ray tracing or tensor cores, while the RTX 4060 Mobile has 24 and 96, respectively. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s for the MI350P and 90.72 GPixel/s for the RTX 4060 Mobile. Texture rate is 1,126.4 GTexel/s for the MI350P and 181.4 GTexel/s for the RTX 4060 Mobile. FP32 and FP16 both measure 36.04 TFLOPS for the MI350P and 11.61 TFLOPS for the RTX 4060 Mobile.

Power and physical specifications diverge completely. The MI350P draws 600 W, uses a dual-slot cooler, requires a 1x 16-pin power connector, and suggests a 1000 W power supply. The RTX 4060 Mobile draws 115 W, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU. The MI350P uses PCIe 5.0 x16, and the RTX 4060 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The MI350P has no display outputs, and the RTX 4060 Mobile has portable device dependent outputs. The MI350P measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The RTX 4060 Mobile has no recorded dimensions. Release dates differ by roughly three years: the MI350P has a release date of May 6, 2026, and the RTX 4060 Mobile has a release date of January 2, 2023. The MI350P lists Radeon Instinct as its predecessor, and the RTX 4060 Mobile lists GeForce 30 Mobile as its predecessor and GeForce 50 Mobile as its successor.

FAQ

Q: What is the AMD Instinct MI350P's memory configuration?

A: The MI350P uses 144 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, providing 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: What is the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile's memory configuration?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile uses 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus, providing 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the MI350P support DirectX or Vulkan?

A: No, the MI350P lists DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan support as N/A. The RTX 4060 Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: Which GPU has more shading units?

A: The MI350P has 8,192 shading units, while the RTX 4060 Mobile has 3,072 shading units.

Q: What are the power requirements for each GPU?

A: The MI350P has a 600 W TDP, a dual-slot cooler, a 1x 16-pin power connector, and a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The RTX 4060 Mobile has a 115 W TDP, is an IGP with no power connectors, and has no suggested PSU.

Q: How does the RTX 4060 Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 4060 Mobile has an average benchmark score of 22,729. Its nearest rivals are the RTX 2080 at 22,895 (0.7% higher), the RX 7700 XT at 22,549 (0.8% lower), the Intel Arc B580 at 23,021 (1.3% higher), and the RTX 5060 Mobile at 22,435 (1.3% lower).

The Verdict

The data supports a straightforward selection based on workload. The AMD Instinct MI350P is a compute accelerator with no graphics output, no consumer API support, and no recorded benchmark scores. Its specifications point to large-scale parallel throughput: 144 GB of HBM3e, 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth, 36.04 TFLOPS in FP32 and FP16, and a 600 W power envelope. It is built for server or workstation environments where memory capacity and bandwidth are critical, and where the absence of display outputs and API support is irrelevant. The 3 nm process and 73,000 million transistors indicate a flagship-class design, but the lack of benchmark data means its real-world performance cannot be verified from the database.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile is a mobile graphics processor with a full feature set for rendering. It has 48 ROPs, 24 ray tracing cores, 96 tensor cores, and API support for DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its recorded benchmark scores place it in the 67th percentile of all GPUs, with an average score of 22,729, and its nearest rivals confirm it competes with desktop GPUs like the RTX 2080 and RX 7700 XT. Its 115 W TDP and IGP form factor make it suitable for laptops, and its 8 GB GDDR6 memory is adequate for mobile gaming and workstation tasks.

For a user who needs pure compute throughput, massive memory, and high bandwidth in a data center context, the MI350P is the indicated choice based on its specifications. For a user who needs a graphics-capable GPU with ray tracing, tensor acceleration, and a validated performance profile, the RTX 4060 Mobile is the only one of the two with the data to support that role. The MI350P cannot render to a display, and the RTX 4060 Mobile cannot match the MI350P’s memory or bandwidth. The decision rests on whether the workload is compute-only or graphics-inclusive, and the database currently has measurements for only one of these parts.