AMD Instinct MI350P vs Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded database contains no benchmark scores for either the AMD Instinct MI350P or the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. Both entries show an average benchmark score of zero, and the head-to-head benchmark list is empty. As a result, there are no measured performance comparisons, no win counts, and no percentile deltas to analyze. The percentile versus all GPUs is identical for both parts at 50, which indicates that without benchmark data, the database places both at the median position by default rather than by demonstrated performance.

The absence of benchmark scores is notable given the specification disparity. The AMD Instinct MI350P is a discrete accelerator with 8,192 shading units, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile is an integrated processor with 128 shading units. However, without recorded measurements, the database cannot confirm any performance relationship. The wins counter shows zero for both items, meaning neither part has any registered benchmark victories in the database. This is consistent with the empty head-to-head array and the zero average score fields.

The data indicates that the MI350P has no nearest rivals listed, and the same applies to the Intel part. With no rival entries, no delta percentages exist to contextualize relative performance. The database therefore offers no quantitative comparison between these two products at present. The only numerical performance indicators available are theoretical throughput values from the specification fields, which are not benchmark results but rather calculated peak rates.

Where Each One Wins

Without benchmark data, the database cannot assign wins to either product. However, the specification fields allow a qualitative assessment of where each part would operate based on hardware capabilities. The AMD Instinct MI350P uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture, a compute-focused design with a 3 nm process node and 73,000 million transistors on a 1190 mm² die. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses Generation 12.2 architecture on a 10 nm process, built for integrated graphics duties within Raptor Lake processors.

The MI350P targets memory-intensive workloads with 144 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, delivering 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The Intel part relies on system shared memory, with bandwidth described as system dependent. The MI350P has a pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s and no display outputs, confirming it is not intended for rendering to screens. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a pixel rate of 4.800 GPixel/s and supports portable device dependent display outputs, meaning it can drive displays in mobile systems.

The texture rate favors the MI350P at 1,126.4 GTexel/s versus 9.600 GTexel/s for the Intel part. The FP32 throughput is 36.04 TFLOPS for the MI350P against 307.2 GFLOPS for the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. FP16 performance is 36.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio for the AMD part, while the Intel part delivers 614.4 GFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio. These figures indicate the MI350P is built for parallel compute throughput, while the Intel part is designed for low-power integrated graphics.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Instinct MI350P uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture, a dedicated compute architecture from AMD's Instinct (MIx) generation. The chip is designated MI350 128CU, fabricated by TSMC on a 3 nm process. The transistor count is 73,000 million, and the die size measures 1190 mm², resulting in a transistor density of 61.3M per mm². The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses the Generation 12.2 architecture, built on Intel's 10 nm process with the Raptor Lake chip. No transistor count, die size, or density figures are recorded for the Intel part.

The MI350P has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 2200 MHz, with memory clocked at 2000 MHz for 8 Gbps effective. The Intel part has a base clock of 300 MHz and a boost clock of 1200 MHz, with system shared memory. The MI350P has 8,192 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and 0 raster operation units. The Intel part has 128 shading units, 8 texture mapping units, and 4 raster operation units. Neither part has recorded ray tracing cores or tensor cores.

The MI350P supports no APIs for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, all listed as N/A. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI350P uses a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface, while the Intel part uses a Ring Bus. The MI350P has no display outputs, whereas the Intel part has portable device dependent outputs. The MI350P has a TDP of 600 W and is dual-slot with a 1x 16-pin power connector and a suggested PSU of 1000 W. The Intel part has a TDP of 15 W and is an IGP with no power connectors listed.

The MI350P dimensions are 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The Intel part has no recorded dimensions, consistent with an integrated design. The MI350P has no production status recorded, while the Intel part is marked as active. The MI350P release date is 2026-05-06, and the Intel part release date is 2023-01-03. The MI350P predecessor is Radeon Instinct, and the Intel part successor is Arc Graphics-M. Neither part has a recorded launch MSRP.

FAQ

Q: What is the memory configuration of the AMD Instinct MI350P?

A: The MI350P has 144 GB of HBM3e memory with an 8192-bit bus width and a bandwidth of 8.19 TB/s. The memory clock is 2000 MHz for 8 Gbps effective.

Q: Does the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile support display outputs?

A: Yes, the Intel part has display outputs described as portable device dependent. It also supports DirectX 12 (12_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two parts?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P has a TDP of 600 W with a suggested PSU of 1000 W, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has a TDP of 15 W with no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Which part has a higher FP32 throughput?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P has an FP32 throughput of 36.04 TFLOPS, while the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile has 307.2 GFLOPS. The MI350P also has FP16 at 36.04 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, versus 614.4 GFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio for the Intel part.

Q: What process nodes do the two parts use?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P uses a 3 nm process from TSMC. The Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile uses a 10 nm process from Intel.

Q: Are there any benchmark scores recorded for either product?

A: No, the database shows an average benchmark score of zero for both the AMD Instinct MI350P and the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile. The head-to-head benchmark list is empty, and no nearest rivals are listed for either part.

The Verdict

The database contains no benchmark results for either the AMD Instinct MI350P or the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile, so performance verdicts cannot be derived from measured data. The specification fields indicate that these are fundamentally different product categories. The AMD part is a dual-slot, 600 W discrete accelerator with 144 GB of HBM3e memory, 8,192 shading units, and no display outputs. The Intel part is a 15 W integrated graphics processor with 128 shading units, system shared memory, and support for display outputs and graphics APIs.

A user requiring a high-throughput compute accelerator for memory-intensive workloads would look at the MI350P based on its 8.19 TB/s bandwidth and 36.04 TFLOPS FP32 throughput. A user needing integrated graphics for a portable device would look at the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile based on its low TDP, API support, and display output capability. The data does not support a direct performance comparison, as no scores exist in the database. The percentile versus all GPUs is 50 for both, but this is a default median value given the absence of benchmark data, not a measured ranking.

The specification differences are stark. The MI350P has a 3 nm process, 73,000 million transistors, a 1190 mm² die, and a boost clock of 2200 MHz. The Intel part has a 10 nm process, a boost clock of 1200 MHz, and no recorded transistor or die size data. The MI350P has 512 TMUs and 0 ROPs, while the Intel part has 8 TMUs and 4 ROPs. The pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s for the MI350P and 4.800 GPixel/s for the Intel part. The texture rate is 1,126.4 GTexel/s versus 9.600 GTexel/s.

The release dates differ by over three years, with the Intel part released on 2023-01-03 and the AMD part on 2026-05-06. The Intel part has a successor listed as Arc Graphics-M, while the MI350P has no successor recorded. The AMD part lists Radeon Instinct as its predecessor. Both parts have no launch MSRP in the database.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Instinct MI350P and the Intel UHD Graphics 710 Mobile:

• Manufacturer: AMD versus Intel
• Chip: MI350 128CU versus Raptor Lake
• Architecture: CDNA 4.0 versus Generation 12.2
• Generation: Instinct (MIx) versus HD Graphics-M (Raptor Lake)
• Process Node: 3 nm versus 10 nm
• Foundry: TSMC versus Intel
• Transistors: 73,000 million versus not recorded
• Die Size: 1190 mm² versus not recorded
• Transistor Density: 61.3M / mm² versus not recorded
• Base Clock: 1000 MHz versus 300 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2200 MHz versus 1200 MHz
• Memory Clock: 2000 MHz 8 Gbps effective versus system shared
• Memory Size: 144 GB versus system shared
• Memory Type: HBM3e versus system shared
• Memory Bus Width: 8192 bit versus system shared
• Memory Bandwidth: 8.19 TB/s versus system dependent
• Shading Units: 8192 versus 128
• TMUs: 512 versus 8
• ROPs: 0 versus 4
• Pixel Rate: 0 MPixel/s versus 4.800 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 1,126.4 GTexel/s versus 9.600 GTexel/s
• FP32: 36.04 TFLOPS versus 307.2 GFLOPS
• FP16: 36.04 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 614.4 GFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 600 W versus 15 W
• Slot Width: Dual-slot versus IGP
• Power Connectors: 1x 16-pin versus not listed
• Suggested PSU: 1000 W versus not listed
• Bus Interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus Ring Bus
• Display Outputs: No outputs versus portable device dependent
• DirectX: N/A versus 12 (12_1)
• OpenGL: N/A versus 4.6
• Vulkan: N/A versus 1.4
• Dimensions: 267 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm versus not recorded
• Production Status: not recorded versus active
• Release Date: 2026-05-06 versus 2023-01-03
• Predecessor: Radeon Instinct versus not recorded
• Successor: not recorded versus Arc Graphics-M
• Launch MSRP: not recorded for either part