AMD Instinct MI350P vs AMD Radeon RX 7600S Comparison

# AMD Instinct MI350P vs AMD Radeon RX 7600S

The AMD Instinct MI350P and AMD Radeon RX 7600S occupy fundamentally different segments of the GPU market. The MI350P is a dual-slot accelerator built on CDNA 4.0 with a 3 nm process, 73,000 million transistors, and 144 GB of HBM3e memory, while the RX 7600S is a mobile integrated graphics processor on RDNA 3.0 with a 6 nm process, 13,300 million transistors, and 8 GB of GDDR6. The database records no shared benchmarks between the two, and the MI350P carries zero recorded benchmark scores with a 50th percentile ranking, whereas the RX 7600S has ten recorded tests and sits in the 60th percentile.

Where Each One Wins

The RX 7600S is the only one of the two with measurable benchmark data. Its recorded scores span compute, graphics, and API-specific workloads. The highest single score is Geekbench Vulkan at 73,868, followed by Geekbench OpenCL at 68,012. In PassMark tests, the G3D score reaches 15,408, while GPU compute sits at 6,520. DirectX performance varies by version: DirectX 9 records 211, DirectX 11 records 140, DirectX 10 records 74, and DirectX 12 records 65. The 2D graphics score is 776. The average benchmark score across all recorded tests is 16,696.

The MI350P has no recorded benchmark results in the database. Its percentile ranking of 50 indicates median placement among all tracked GPUs, but without scores, direct performance comparisons cannot be made from measured data. The architecture indicates its intended workload: 8,192 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and zero ROPs. The pixel rate is recorded as 0 MPixel/s, which confirms the absence of traditional rasterization output. The texture rate is 1,126.4 GTexel/s, and FP32 compute is 36.04 TFLOPS with FP16 at the same 36.04 TFLOPS in a 1:1 ratio. These specifications point toward compute acceleration rather than graphical rendering.

The RX 7600S delivers conventional graphics features. It has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, 64 ROPs, and 28 ray tracing cores. Pixel rate is 140.8 GPixel/s, texture rate is 246.4 GTexel/s, FP32 is 15.77 TFLOPS, and FP16 is 31.54 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI350P lists no API support for DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan, which reinforces its role as a non-rendering compute device.

The Verdict

The data shows two products with opposite design goals. The RX 7600S is a mobile graphics processor with a 75 W TDP, integrated form factor, and no power connectors. It is designed for portable devices and delivers a full graphics API stack. Its benchmark results confirm functionality across compute and graphics workloads, with the Geekbench Vulkan score of 73,868 being the strongest recorded result.

The MI350P is a 600 W dual-slot accelerator with a 1000 W suggested PSU, a single 16-pin power connector, and no display outputs. It uses a 8192-bit memory bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth and 144 GB of HBM3e. The lack of ROPs and API support means it cannot output video. Its 50th percentile ranking with zero benchmark scores provides no measured evidence of compute performance relative to other accelerators.

Users seeking a mobile GPU with verified benchmark results should consider the RX 7600S. Users requiring a high-bandwidth compute accelerator with massive memory capacity should consider the MI350P based on its specifications, since no benchmark data exists for direct comparison. The nearest rivals to the RX 7600S are the NVIDIA T400 4 GB with an average score of 16,792 and a delta of -0.6%, the NVIDIA T400 at 16,508 with a delta of 1.1%, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 at 16,504 with a delta of 1.2%, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 at 16,932 with a delta of -1.4%. The RX 7600S sits between these scores, indicating close performance parity with that group.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database records no shared benchmarks between the MI350P and RX 7600S. The wins count is zero for both sides. Direct numerical comparison is therefore impossible from measured data.

The RX 7600S delivers its strongest results in Geekbench tests. The Vulkan score of 73,868 exceeds the OpenCL score of 68,012 by 5,856 points, a difference of approximately 8.6%. This gap suggests the RDNA 3.0 architecture handles Vulkan workloads more efficiently than OpenCL in this mobile configuration. The PassMark G3D score of 15,408 is more than double the GPU compute score of 6,520, indicating that graphics rendering performance outpaces raw compute throughput in that benchmark suite.

The MI350P offers specifications that dwarf the RX 7600S in raw capacity. Memory bandwidth is 8.19 TB/s versus 256.0 GB/s, a 32-fold difference. Memory capacity is 144 GB versus 8 GB, an 18-fold difference. Texture rate is 1,126.4 GTexel/s versus 246.4 GTexel/s, a 4.6-fold difference. FP32 compute is 36.04 TFLOPS versus 15.77 TFLOPS, a 2.3-fold difference. The transistor counts differ substantially: 73,000 million versus 13,300 million, while the die sizes are 1190 mm² versus 204 mm². The MI350P uses a 3 nm process with a transistor density of 61.3M per mm², while the RX 7600S uses a 6 nm process with a density of 65.2M per mm².

The MI350P's FP16 performance is identical to FP32 at 36.04 TFLOPS, indicating a 1:1 ratio commonly associated with compute-focused architectures. The RX 7600S halves FP16 to 31.54 TFLOPS against 15.77 TFLOPS FP32, a 2:1 ratio typical of graphics-oriented designs. Both GPUs boost to 2200 MHz, but the base clocks differ: the MI350P runs at 1000 MHz, while the RX 7600S starts at 1500 MHz with a game clock of 1865 MHz.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher benchmark percentile ranking?

A: The RX 7600S ranks in the 60th percentile among all GPUs, while the MI350P ranks in the 50th percentile.

Q: What is the highest recorded benchmark score for the RX 7600S?

A: The Geekbench Vulkan test records 73,868, which is the highest single score among its ten recorded benchmarks.

Q: Does the MI350P support DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan?

A: The database lists N/A for all three APIs on the MI350P, and its pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s with no display outputs.

Q: How much memory does each GPU have?

A: The MI350P has 144 GB of HBM3e on a 8192-bit bus with 8.19 TB/s bandwidth. The RX 7600S has 8 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: What are the nearest rivals to the RX 7600S in average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA T400 4 GB scores 16,792 with a -0.6% delta, the NVIDIA T400 scores 16,508 with a 1.1% delta, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5090 D V2 scores 16,504 with a 1.2% delta, and the NVIDIA Tesla M4 scores 16,932 with a -1.4% delta.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two GPUs?

A: The MI350P has a 600 W TDP with a 1000 W suggested PSU and a 16-pin power connector. The RX 7600S has a 75 W TDP with no power connectors.

Architecture Differences

The MI350P uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture on a 3 nm TSMC process, while the RX 7600S uses the RDNA 3.0 architecture on a 6 nm TSMC process. The MI350P die measures 1190 mm² with 73,000 million transistors, resulting in a density of 61.3M per mm². The RX 7600S die measures 204 mm² with 13,300 million transistors, resulting in a density of 65.2M per mm². Despite the larger die, the MI350P has a lower transistor density, which reflects the different design priorities of compute versus graphics.

The MI350P has 8,192 shading units, 512 TMUs, and zero ROPs. The RX 7600S has 1,792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The MI350P also includes 28 ray tracing cores on the RX 7600S, while the MI350P lists no ray tracing cores. The memory subsystems differ fundamentally: HBM3e with 8192-bit bus width versus GDDR6 with 128-bit bus width. The MI350P's memory clock is 2000 MHz with 8 Gbps effective speed, while the RX 7600S also runs at 2000 MHz but with 16 Gbps effective speed.

The MI350P is a dual-slot card measuring 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width. The RX 7600S is an integrated graphics processor with no recorded dimensions. The MI350P uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RX 7600S uses PCIe 4.0 x16. The MI350P has no display outputs, while the RX 7600S has portable device dependent outputs. The MI350P's release date is recorded as 2026-05-06, while the RX 7600S released on 2023-01-03. The MI350P's predecessor is Radeon Instinct, and the RX 7600S's predecessor is Polaris Mobile.