AMD Instinct MI350P vs AMD Radeon RX 7600M Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The database contains no direct head-to-head benchmark results for the AMD Instinct MI350P and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M. The Instinct MI350P has no recorded benchmark scores, an average benchmark score of 0, and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs. The Radeon RX 7600M, in contrast, has a single recorded Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775, placing it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs.

Because the Instinct MI350P lacks any measured performance data, a direct numerical comparison of their compute capabilities is not possible from the recorded information. The Radeon RX 7600M’s nearest rivals in the database, however, provide context for its measured performance. It sits within 0.1% of the AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT LP (63830, delta -0.1%), within 0.1% of the NVIDIA CMP 30HX (63842, delta -0.1%), and 0.1% ahead of the AMD Radeon Pro Vega 56 (63693, delta +0.1%). The AMD Radeon Pro WX 9100 leads it by 0.7% with a score of 64212.

For the Instinct MI350P, the absence of benchmark entries means its percentile rank of 50 is a default placement rather than a measured outcome. The data indicates that the Radeon RX 7600M has a verified performance footprint, while the Instinct MI350P does not. The theoretical specifications of the Instinct MI350P, such as an FP32 throughput of 36.04 TFLOPS versus the RX 7600M’s 17.27 TFLOPS, suggest a large compute advantage, but no benchmark score confirms this in practice.

The wins tally is likewise empty: the head-to-head benchmark list contains no entries, and both win counters are zero. This is a case where the available data is one-sided, with only the mobile Radeon part having any recorded performance results.

Where Each One Wins

The Radeon RX 7600M wins in every category where measured data exists. Its Geekbench OpenCL score of 63775 is the sole benchmark result in this comparison. The Instinct MI350P has no wins in any recorded metric, as its benchmark array is empty and its average score is zero.

For compute workloads, the RX 7600M’s measured OpenCL performance places it in the 89th percentile of all GPUs, a strong showing relative to the broader database. Its nearest rivals cluster within a narrow band: the RX 9060 XT LP and CMP 30HX are effectively tied, while the Pro WX 9100 is slightly ahead. This indicates that the RX 7600M delivers competitive compute throughput in its measured segment.

The Instinct MI350P, by contrast, has no verified wins because there is no performance data to evaluate. Its theoretical specifications point to a different class of hardware: 8192 shading units, 512 texture mapping units, and an FP32 rate of 36.04 TFLOPS. These figures are more than double the RX 7600M’s 1792 shading units and 17.27 TFLOPS. Yet without benchmark scores, the database cannot confirm where the Instinct part would win in practice.

In terms of feature support, the RX 7600M has a clear edge for graphics and API compatibility. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and it includes 28 ray tracing cores. The Instinct MI350P lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan, and it has no ray tracing cores. Display outputs also differ: the RX 7600M is described as “Portable Device Dependent,” while the Instinct MI350P has no outputs at all. The Instinct is a compute-focused accelerator, whereas the RX 7600M is a mobile graphics part with full API support.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different AMD families with distinct designs. The Instinct MI350P uses the CDNA 4.0 architecture, built for compute acceleration, while the Radeon RX 7600M uses RDNA 3.0, designed for graphics and gaming. The Instinct’s chip is labeled “MI350 128CU,” and the RX 7600M uses “Navi 33,” with the codename “Hotpink Bonefish” for the mobile part.

Process technology separates them clearly. The Instinct MI350P is fabricated on TSMC’s 3 nm node, while the RX 7600M uses TSMC’s 6 nm node. The Instinct packs 73,000 million transistors on a 1190 mm² die, resulting in a transistor density of 61.3 million per mm². The RX 7600M has 13,300 million transistors on a 204 mm² die, with a slightly higher density of 65.2 million per mm². The Instinct’s die is roughly 5.8 times larger in area and holds more than 5.5 times the transistor count.

Memory architecture is fundamentally different. The Instinct MI350P uses 144 GB of HBM3e memory with an 8192-bit bus and 8.19 TB/s of bandwidth. The RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 256.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The memory clock for both is listed as 2000 MHz, with 8 Gbps effective for the Instinct and 16 Gbps effective for the RX 7600M.

Compute resources differ substantially. The Instinct MI350P has 8192 shading units and 512 TMUs, with no ROPs (pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s). The RX 7600M has 1792 shading units, 112 TMUs, and 64 ROPs, with a pixel rate of 154.2 GPixel/s. Texture rate is 1,126.4 GTexel/s for the Instinct versus 269.9 GTexel/s for the RX 7600M. FP16 throughput is notable: the Instinct delivers 36.04 TFLOPS at a 1:1 ratio with FP32, while the RX 7600M achieves 34.55 TFLOPS at a 2:1 ratio, meaning its FP16 is double its FP32 rate.

Clock speeds also differ. The Instinct MI350P has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost of 2200 MHz. The RX 7600M has a base of 1500 MHz, a game clock of 2070 MHz, and a boost of 2410 MHz. Despite the lower base clock, the Instinct’s boost is close to the RX 7600M’s, but the massive difference in core count drives the compute gap.

Power and physical characteristics are polar opposites. The Instinct MI350P is rated at 600 W TDP, uses a dual-slot design with a 1x 16-pin power connector, and requires a 1000 W suggested PSU. The RX 7600M is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with a 90 W TDP and no power connectors. The Instinct measures 267 mm in length, 111 mm in height, and 40 mm in width, while the RX 7600M has no recorded dimensions. Bus interfaces differ as well: PCIe 5.0 x16 for the Instinct versus PCIe 4.0 x16 for the RX 7600M.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Instinct MI350P has an FP32 rate of 36.04 TFLOPS, which is more than double the Radeon RX 7600M’s 17.27 TFLOPS.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference between the two?

A: The Instinct MI350P has 144 GB of HBM3e memory, while the Radeon RX 7600M has 8 GB of GDDR6 memory. Memory bandwidth is 8.19 TB/s for the Instinct versus 256.0 GB/s for the RX 7600M.

Q: Does the Radeon RX 7600M support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RX 7600M includes 28 ray tracing cores and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2). The Instinct MI350P has no ray tracing cores and lists N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan.

Q: Which GPU has a higher measured benchmark score?

A: Only the Radeon RX 7600M has a recorded benchmark score: 63775 in Geekbench OpenCL, placing it in the 89th percentile. The Instinct MI350P has no benchmark scores and an average score of 0.

Q: What are the process nodes for each GPU?

A: The Instinct MI350P is built on TSMC’s 3 nm node, while the Radeon RX 7600M uses TSMC’s 6 nm node.

Q: What is the TDP difference between the two?

A: The Instinct MI350P has a TDP of 600 W and requires a 1000 W suggested PSU. The Radeon RX 7600M has a TDP of 90 W and uses no power connectors.

Specification Differences

The following fields differ between the AMD Instinct MI350P and the AMD Radeon RX 7600M:

• Architecture: CDNA 4.0 versus RDNA 3.0
• Chip: MI350 128CU versus Navi 33
• Codename: None versus Hotpink Bonefish
• Generation: Instinct (MIx) versus Navi Mobile (RX 7000M)
• Process Node: 3 nm versus 6 nm
• Transistors: 73,000 million versus 13,300 million
• Die Size: 1190 mm² versus 204 mm²
• Transistor Density: 61.3M / mm² versus 65.2M / mm²
• Base Clock: 1000 MHz versus 1500 MHz
• Boost Clock: 2200 MHz versus 2410 MHz
• Game Clock: None versus 2070 MHz
• Memory Clock: 8 Gbps effective versus 16 Gbps effective
• Memory Size: 144 GB versus 8 GB
• Memory Type: HBM3e versus GDDR6
• Memory Bus Width: 8192 bit versus 128 bit
• Memory Bandwidth: 8.19 TB/s versus 256.0 GB/s
• Shading Units: 8192 versus 1792
• TMUs: 512 versus 112
• ROPs: 0 versus 64
• RT Cores: None versus 28
• Pixel Rate: 0 MPixel/s versus 154.2 GPixel/s
• Texture Rate: 1,126.4 GTexel/s versus 269.9 GTexel/s
• FP32: 36.04 TFLOPS versus 17.27 TFLOPS
• FP16: 36.04 TFLOPS (1:1) versus 34.55 TFLOPS (2:1)
• TDP: 600 W versus 90 W
• Slot Width: Dual-slot versus IGP
• Power Connectors: 1x 16-pin versus None
• Suggested PSU: 1000 W versus None
• Bus Interface: PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16
• Display Outputs: No outputs versus Portable Device Dependent
• DirectX: N/A versus 12 Ultimate (12_2)
• OpenGL: N/A versus 4.6
• Vulkan: N/A versus 1.4
• Dimensions: 267 mm x 111 mm x 40 mm versus None
• Production Status: None versus Active
• Release Date: 2026-05-06 versus 2023-01-03
• Predecessor: Radeon Instinct versus Polaris Mobile
• Percentile: 50 versus 89
• Average Benchmark Score: 0 versus 63775