AMD Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data for the AMD Instinct MI325X contains no benchmark scores, while the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a substantial set of measurements. This makes a direct head-to-head comparison impossible based on empirical test results. The MI325X shows an average benchmark score of zero and a percentile rank of 50 among all GPUs, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER holds a percentile rank of 76 and an average benchmark score of 31,087. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rival in the database is the NVIDIA Quadro M5000 with an average score of 31,206, placing the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER 0.4% behind that card. The NVIDIA GRID M60-1Q also sits at 31,220, again 0.4% ahead of the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Further up, the NVIDIA RTX PRO 4500 Blackwell averages 31,532, which is 1.4% higher, and the NVIDIA TITAN RTX averages 31,676, 1.9% higher. These deltas are narrow, indicating that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER clusters tightly with those four accelerators in aggregate performance.

Looking at the individual RTX 4070 Ti SUPER benchmark entries, the highest raw score comes from Geekbench OpenCL at 199,267, followed by Passmark G3D at 31,811 and Passmark GPU Compute at 18,372. The Vulkan score in Geekbench is 53,683, while 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 records 5,569. The Passmark suite shows varied results across DirectX versions: DirectX 9 yields 360, DirectX 11 yields 278, DirectX 10 yields 181, and DirectX 12 yields 119. The 2D graphics test in Passmark produces 1,225. These figures reveal that the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER performs best in compute-oriented workloads and general 3D rendering, but its legacy DirectX 9 and 10 scores are comparatively modest relative to its modern API results. For the MI325X, the absence of any benchmark data means it cannot be positioned against the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER in any specific test, and the wins counter shows zero for both sides. The data simply does not support a quantitative head-to-head narrative; instead, it highlights that the MI325X is an unmeasured entry in this database while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has been thoroughly characterized.

The Verdict

Based strictly on the available data, the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the only option with recorded performance evidence. Its average benchmark score of 31,087 and 76th percentile ranking place it in the upper tier of all GPUs tracked by the database. The MI325X, with no benchmarks and a 50th percentile default, cannot be recommended for any workload where measured performance matters. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also has a production status of end-of-life, yet its benchmark results remain valid for analysis. The MI325X has no production status listed, leaving its availability unclear. For anyone selecting a GPU based on empirical data, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is the clear choice because it has verifiable scores across multiple test suites, while the MI325X offers none. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's nearest rivals all sit within 1.9% of its average score, suggesting it is competitively positioned among similar accelerators. The MI325X, by contrast, has no rivals listed, which further emphasizes the lack of comparative data. The verdict from the database is unambiguous: the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER delivers measurable results, and the MI325X does not, so any performance-based decision must favor the NVIDIA card.

Architecture Differences

The two accelerators diverge fundamentally in their design goals and underlying architectures. The AMD Instinct MI325X uses the Aqua Vanjaram chip built on CDNA 3.0 architecture, fabricated on a 5 nm process at TSMC. Its transistor count is 153,000 million, and the die size is 1017 mm², yielding a transistor density of 150.4 million per mm². The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses the AD103 chip based on Ada Lovelace architecture, also on a 5 nm TSMC process, but with 45,900 million transistors on a 379 mm² die, resulting in a density of 121.1 million per mm². The MI325X is a compute-focused accelerator with no display outputs, no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan API support, and no ROPs. Its pixel rate is recorded as 0 MPixel/s, and its texture rate is 2,553.6 GTexel/s. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, in contrast, is a full graphics solution with 96 ROPs, 66 RT cores, and 264 tensor cores. It supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, and provides display outputs including 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. Its pixel rate is 250.6 GPixel/s, and its texture rate is 689.0 GTexel/s.

Clock speeds also differ markedly. The MI325X has a base clock of 1000 MHz and a boost clock of 2100 MHz, with memory clocked at 1500 MHz (6 Gbps effective). The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER runs at a base of 2340 MHz and boost of 2610 MHz, with memory at 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). The MI325X delivers 81.72 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16 (1:1 ratio), while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER provides 44.10 TFLOPS for both FP32 and FP16. The MI325X has 19,456 shading units and 1,216 TMUs, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 8,448 shading units and 264 TMUs. Memory configurations are starkly different: the MI325X uses 256 GB of HBM3e on an 8192-bit bus with 6.14 TB/s bandwidth, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses 16 GB of GDDR6X on a 256-bit bus with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth. The MI325X is an OAM module with no power connectors and a 1000 W TDP, requiring a 1400 W suggested PSU. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is a triple-slot card with a 1x 16-pin connector, a 285 W TDP, and a 600 W suggested PSU. The MI325X uses PCIe 5.0 x16, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER uses PCIe 4.0 x16. These architectural differences point to the MI325X being engineered for massive parallel compute with enormous memory capacity, whereas the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER balances graphics rendering, ray tracing, and tensor workloads in a consumer-friendly form factor.

FAQ

Q: What is the average benchmark score for the AMD Instinct MI325X?

A: The database records an average benchmark score of 0 for the MI325X, with no individual benchmark entries listed.

Q: How does the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER compare to its nearest rival, the NVIDIA Quadro M5000?

A: The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has an average score of 31,087, which is 0.4% lower than the Quadro M5000's average score of 31,206.

Q: What memory type and size does the MI325X use?

A: The MI325X uses 256 GB of HBM3e memory on an 8192-bit bus, providing 6.14 TB/s of bandwidth.

Q: Does the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER support ray tracing?

A: Yes, the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER includes 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, and its architecture supports DirectX 12 Ultimate, OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4.

Q: What is the TDP of each accelerator?

A: The MI325X has a TDP of 1000 W with a suggested PSU of 1400 W, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a TDP of 285 W with a suggested PSU of 600 W.

Q: Which GPU has a higher FP32 performance?

A: The MI325X delivers 81.72 TFLOPS in FP32, which is higher than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 44.10 TFLOPS.

Where Each One Wins

The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER wins in every measured category because it is the only accelerator with benchmark data. Its Passmark G3D score of 31,811 and Geekbench OpenCL score of 199,267 indicate strong general 3D rendering and compute performance. Its Vulkan score of 53,683 shows solid cross-API capability, and its 3DMark Steel Nomad DX12 score of 5,569 confirms modern DirectX 12 performance. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER also wins in graphics-specific features, as it has ROPs, RT cores, tensor cores, and display outputs, making it suitable for rendering, ray tracing, and AI inference tasks. Its 96 ROPs and 250.6 GPixel/s pixel rate enable high-resolution rasterization, while its 264 tensor cores support deep learning workloads. The card's 16 GB GDDR6X memory with 672.3 GB/s bandwidth is ample for gaming and professional graphics applications.

The MI325X wins in raw compute specifications without any benchmark validation. Its FP32 and FP16 performance of 81.72 TFLOPS is nearly double the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 44.10 TFLOPS. Its memory capacity of 256 GB HBM3e with 6.14 TB/s bandwidth dwarfs the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's 16 GB GDDR6X with 672.3 GB/s. The MI325X also has a higher texture rate of 2,553.6 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s, and more shading units (19,456 vs 8,448) and TMUs (1,216 vs 264). The MI325X uses PCIe 5.0 x16, which is newer than the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER's PCIe 4.0 x16. However, these specification advantages have no corresponding benchmark scores, so they cannot be confirmed as real-world wins. The MI325X also has no display outputs and no graphics API support, limiting its use to compute-only environments. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER therefore wins in any scenario requiring measured performance, graphics output, or API compatibility, while the MI325X only wins on paper in raw computational and memory specifications.

Specification Differences

The two accelerators differ across nearly every specification field. The MI325X has no series designation, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER belongs to the GeForce 40-series. The MI325X is part of the Instinct (MIx) generation, and the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is in the GeForce 40 generation. Their chips are Aqua Vanjaram versus AD103, and architectures are CDNA 3.0 versus Ada Lovelace. Both use 5 nm TSMC processes, but transistor counts differ: 153,000 million for the MI325X versus 45,900 million for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. Die sizes are 1017 mm² versus 379 mm², and transistor densities are 150.4M per mm² versus 121.1M per mm². Base clocks are 1000 MHz versus 2340 MHz, boost clocks are 2100 MHz versus 2610 MHz, and memory clocks are 1500 MHz (6 Gbps effective) versus 1313 MHz (21 Gbps effective). Memory size is 256 GB versus 16 GB, type is HBM3e versus GDDR6X, bus width is 8192 bit versus 256 bit, and bandwidth is 6.14 TB/s versus 672.3 GB/s.

Shading units are 19,456 versus 8,448, TMUs are 1,216 versus 264, and ROPs are 0 versus 96. The RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has 66 RT cores and 264 tensor cores, while the MI325X has none listed. Pixel rate is 0 MPixel/s versus 250.6 GPixel/s, and texture rate is 2,553.6 GTexel/s versus 689.0 GTexel/s. FP32 is 81.72 TFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS, and FP16 is identical at 81.72 TFLOPS versus 44.10 TFLOPS. TDP is 1000 W versus 285 W, slot width is OAM Module versus Triple-slot, and power connectors are None versus 1x 16-pin. Suggested PSU is 1400 W versus 600 W. Bus interface is PCIe 5.0 x16 versus PCIe 4.0 x16. Display outputs are No outputs versus 1x HDMI 2.1 and 3x DisplayPort 1.4a. API support is N/A for DirectX, OpenGL, and Vulkan on the MI325X, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Release dates are 2024-10-09 for the MI325X and 2024-01-23 for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER. The MI325X has no launch MSRP, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER has a launch MSRP of 799 USD. The MI325X lists no production status, while the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER is marked end-of-life. Predecessors are Radeon Instinct for the MI325X and GeForce 30 for the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER, with the RTX 4070 Ti SUPER having a successor in GeForce 50, while the MI325X has none.