AMD Instinct MI325X vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile Comparison

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows no shared benchmark entries between the AMD Instinct MI325X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The MI325X has no benchmark scores in the database, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has nine recorded tests. This absence of overlapping workloads means a direct score comparison cannot be drawn from the same test suite.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers its strongest result in Geekbench OpenCL with a score of 143870, and its Geekbench Vulkan result reaches 139213. These two scores indicate that the mobile part has substantial compute throughput in API-level workloads. The Passmark G3D score of 24004 and the Passmark GPU Compute score of 10101 further characterize its performance profile. DirectX legacy tests show lower figures: Passmark DirectX 9 records 259, DirectX 11 records 237, DirectX 10 records 151, and DirectX 12 records 102. The Passmark G2D score of 981 reflects 2D graphics capability.

The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile sits at the 80th percentile among all GPUs in the database, with an average benchmark score of 35435. Its nearest rivals bracket this result closely. The NVIDIA Quadro GV100 averages 35520, a delta of -0.2 percent relative to the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The AMD Radeon Pro Duo averages 35860, a delta of -1.2 percent. The NVIDIA A2 averages 34690, a delta of 2.1 percent. The NVIDIA T1000 averages 36289, a delta of -2.4 percent. These deltas show that the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile performs within a narrow band around its immediate competitors, trailing the Quadro GV100 by a negligible margin, trailing the Radeon Pro Duo by a slightly larger margin, and exceeding the A2 and T1000 by 2.1 and 2.4 percent respectively.

The MI325X holds the 50th percentile position among all GPUs with an average benchmark score of zero, and it has no nearest rivals listed. The absence of benchmark data for the MI325X means the database cannot quantify its competitive standing against the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile. The architecture differences below provide the only measurable basis for comparing these two products.

Architecture Differences

The AMD Instinct MI325X and the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile diverge at nearly every architectural level. The MI325X uses the Aqua Vanjaram chip built on CDNA 3.0 architecture, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses the GB205 chip built on Blackwell 2.0 architecture. Both are fabricated by TSMC on a 5 nm process, but the transistor counts differ enormously: the MI325X packs 153,000 million transistors on a 1017 mm² die, yielding a transistor density of 150.4 million per square millimeter. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile contains 31,100 million transistors on a 263 mm² die, with a density of 118.3 million per square millimeter. The MI325X die is nearly four times larger and holds roughly five times more transistors.

The memory subsystems are similarly divergent. The MI325X uses 256 GB of HBM3e memory across an 8192-bit bus, delivering 6.14 TB/s of bandwidth. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile uses 12 GB of GDDR7 memory on a 192-bit bus, delivering 672.0 GB/s. The MI325X has more than twenty times the memory capacity and over nine times the bandwidth. The MI325X memory clock runs at 1500 MHz with 6 Gbps effective data rate, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile memory runs at 1750 MHz with 28 Gbps effective data rate.

Compute resources also differ by a wide margin. The MI325X has 19456 shading units, 1216 texture mapping units, and zero ROPs. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 5888 shading units, 184 TMUs, and 80 ROPs. The MI325X texture rate reaches 2553.6 GTexel/s, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile texture rate is 266.2 GTexel/s. The pixel rate for the MI325X is recorded as 0 MPixel/s due to the absence of ROPs, whereas the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile delivers 115.8 GPixel/s. FP32 throughput stands at 81.72 TFLOPS for the MI325X and 17.04 TFLOPS for the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile; both achieve a 1:1 FP16 to FP32 ratio. The MI325X includes no dedicated ray tracing cores or tensor cores in the recorded data. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores.

Clock behavior separates the two as well. The MI325X base clock is 1000 MHz with a boost of 2100 MHz. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile base clock is 847 MHz with a boost of 1447 MHz. The MI325X runs at a higher clock ceiling but consumes far more power: its TDP is recorded at 1000 W with a suggested PSU of 1400 W. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile TDP is 60 W with no suggested PSU listed. The MI325X occupies an OAM Module slot width with no power connectors and no display outputs. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile is an IGP with no power connectors and portable device dependent display outputs. The MI325X supports no DirectX, OpenGL, or Vulkan APIs in the database, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Both use a PCIe 5.0 x16 bus interface.

The release dates differ by roughly five months. The MI325X launched on October 9, 2024, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile launched on February 28, 2025. The MI325X belongs to the Instinct (MIx) generation with a Radeon Instinct predecessor, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile belongs to the GeForce 50 Mobile generation with a GeForce 40 Mobile predecessor. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has an active production status; the MI325X production status is not recorded.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has higher FP32 compute throughput?

A: The AMD Instinct MI325X records 81.72 TFLOPS FP32, which is 4.8 times the 17.04 TFLOPS delivered by the NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile.

Q: How do the memory capacities compare?

A: The MI325X has 256 GB of HBM3e memory, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has 12 GB of GDDR7 memory. The MI325X provides more than twenty times the capacity.

Q: What is the power consumption difference?

A: The MI325X TDP is 1000 W with a suggested PSU of 1400 W. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile TDP is 60 W with no suggested PSU listed.

Q: Does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile support modern graphics APIs?

A: Yes, the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The MI325X has no API support recorded in the database.

Q: How does the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile compare to its nearest rivals?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile averages 35435. It trails the NVIDIA Quadro GV100 by 0.2 percent and the AMD Radeon Pro Duo by 1.2 percent, while leading the NVIDIA A2 by 2.1 percent and the NVIDIA T1000 by 2.4 percent.

Q: Which GPU has ray tracing hardware?

A: The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile includes 46 ray tracing cores. The MI325X has no ray tracing core count recorded in the database.

Specification Differences

| Specification | AMD Instinct MI325X | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile |

|---|---|---|

| Chip | Aqua Vanjaram | GB205 |

| Architecture | CDNA 3.0 | Blackwell 2.0 |

| Generation | Instinct (MIx) | GeForce 50 Mobile |

| Transistors | 153,000 million | 31,100 million |

| Die Size | 1017 mm² | 263 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 150.4M / mm² | 118.3M / mm² |

| Base Clock | 1000 MHz | 847 MHz |

| Boost Clock | 2100 MHz | 1447 MHz |

| Memory Clock | 1500 MHz 6 Gbps effective | 1750 MHz 28 Gbps effective |

| Memory Size | 256 GB | 12 GB |

| Memory Type | HBM3e | GDDR7 |

| Memory Bus Width | 8192 bit | 192 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 6.14 TB/s | 672.0 GB/s |

| Shading Units | 19456 | 5888 |

| TMUs | 1216 | 184 |

| ROPs | 0 | 80 |

| RT Cores | None recorded | 46 |

| Tensor Cores | None recorded | 184 |

| Pixel Rate | 0 MPixel/s | 115.8 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 2,553.6 GTexel/s | 266.2 GTexel/s |

| FP32 | 81.72 TFLOPS | 17.04 TFLOPS |

| FP16 | 81.72 TFLOPS (1:1) | 17.04 TFLOPS (1:1) |

| TDP | 1000 W | 60 W |

| Slot Width | OAM Module | IGP |

| Suggested PSU | 1400 W | None recorded |

| Display Outputs | No outputs | Portable Device Dependent |

| DirectX | N/A | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |

| OpenGL | N/A | 4.6 |

| Vulkan | N/A | 1.4 |

| Production Status | None recorded | Active |

| Release Date | 2024-10-09 | 2025-02-28 |

| Predecessor | Radeon Instinct | GeForce 40 Mobile |

| Percentile vs All GPUs | 50 | 80 |

| Average Benchmark Score | 0 | 35435 |

Where Each One Wins

The AMD Instinct MI325X wins decisively in raw compute throughput and memory capacity. Its FP32 output of 81.72 TFLOPS is 4.8 times the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile figure, and its 256 GB memory capacity dwarfs the 12 GB available on the mobile part. The 8192-bit bus and 6.14 TB/s bandwidth place the MI325X in a different class for memory-bound workloads. The zero ROP count and absence of display outputs indicate that the MI325X is not designed for rasterization or direct rendering; the recorded pixel rate of 0 MPixel/s confirms this. The MI325X targets data-center compute density, as suggested by the OAM Module slot width and the absence of any graphics API support in the database. Its 1000 W TDP and 1400 W suggested PSU further position it as a server-installed accelerator.

The NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Ti Mobile wins in every area of client-facing graphics capability. It delivers 115.8 GPixel/s pixel throughput with 80 ROPs, includes 46 ray tracing cores and 184 tensor cores, and supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. Its 60 W TDP makes it suitable for portable devices, and its production status is active. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile has nine recorded benchmark scores spanning compute and graphics workloads, with its Geekbench OpenCL score of 143870 and Vulkan score of 139213 indicating strong API-level performance. Its 80th percentile ranking places it above three of its four nearest rivals, with only the NVIDIA T1000 exceeding it by more than two percent.

The MI325X has no benchmark scores and sits at the 50th percentile with an average score of zero, so the database cannot confirm any workload-specific wins beyond the architectural specifications. The recorded transistor density of 150.4 million per square millimeter on the MI325X versus 118.3 million on the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile shows that the AMD part packs more logic into each square millimeter of silicon. The MI325X achieves a higher boost clock at 2100 MHz versus 1447 MHz, reinforcing its compute-oriented design. The RTX 5070 Ti Mobile counters with a higher memory clock in effective data rate terms, 28 Gbps versus 6 Gbps, though the MI325X compensates with a far wider bus.

For database classification, the MI325X belongs to the server accelerator segment with no consumer graphics features, while the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile belongs to the mobile graphics segment with full API support. The release dates place the MI325X first at October 9, 2024, followed by the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile on February 28, 2025. The MI325X predecessor is the Radeon Instinct, and the RTX 5070 Ti Mobile predecessor is the GeForce 40 Mobile. These lineage differences reflect the two products' separate design goals: one for massive parallel compute with extreme memory capacity, the other for balanced graphics and compute in a power-constrained mobile form factor.