AMD FirePro W7000 vs Intel Arc B570 Comparison

Intel Arc B570 decisively outperforms the AMD FirePro W7000 in every benchmark category where both have data, with the gap ranging from roughly 340% to 369% depending on the workload. The FirePro W7000, an end-of-life workstation part from 2012, cannot compete with the modern Xe2-HPG architecture in raw compute or API-level performance, but the data also shows that both cards occupy the same 65th percentile among all GPUs, indicating that the context of use matters more than the raw score disparity.

Where Each One Wins

The Intel Arc B570 wins every single head-to-head benchmark available, making it the clear choice for any workload that relies on modern API performance or general compute. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Arc B570 scores 83,514 against the FirePro W7000’s 17,808, a 369% advantage that reflects the massive generational leap in shader throughput and memory bandwidth. Similarly, in Geekbench Vulkan, the Arc B570 posts 96,844 versus 22,001, a 340.2% lead, highlighting its full support for Vulkan 1.4 and modern rendering pipelines.

The AMD FirePro W7000 does not win any benchmark in the dataset, but its historical positioning as a professional workstation card means it was designed for compute stability rather than gaming or consumer workloads. Its only recorded scores are in Geekbench OpenCL and Vulkan, and both are dramatically lower than the Arc B570’s. The FirePro’s 65th percentile ranking among all GPUs is identical to the Arc B570’s, suggesting that its legacy drivers and GCN 1.0 architecture still hold up reasonably well for older professional applications, but the data offers no scenario where it outperforms the Intel card.

For users prioritizing raw throughput in modern benchmarks, the Arc B570 is the only option. For those running legacy software that predates DirectX 12 Ultimate or Vulkan 1.4, the FirePro W7000’s older feature set might be sufficient, but there is no performance metric in this dataset that favors it.

Architecture Differences

The architectural gap between these two cards is enormous, spanning nearly 13 years of GPU design. The Intel Arc B570 is built on TSMC’s 5 nm process with 19,600 million transistors on a 272 mm² die, achieving a transistor density of 72.1M per mm². In contrast, the AMD FirePro W7000 uses TSMC’s 28 nm node with just 2,800 million transistors on a 212 mm² die, yielding a density of 13.2M per mm². This means the Arc B570 packs nearly seven times more transistors into a die that is only 28% larger, fundamentally changing what each chip can do per clock cycle.

The Arc B570 features the Xe2-HPG architecture (Battlemage generation) with 2,304 shading units, 144 texture mapping units, and 80 render output units. It also includes 18 dedicated ray tracing cores, a feature entirely absent from the FirePro W7000. The FirePro uses GCN 1.0 with 1,280 shading units, 80 TMUs, and 32 ROPs, and has no ray tracing or tensor core support. The Arc B570’s FP32 throughput is 11.52 TFLOPS versus the FirePro’s 2.432 TFLOPS, a 4.7x difference that explains the benchmark results.

Memory architecture is another major divider. The Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus, delivering 380.0 GB/s of bandwidth. The FirePro W7000 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus, providing 153.6 GB/s. Despite the FirePro’s wider bus, the Arc B570’s much faster memory clocks (2375 MHz vs 1200 MHz) result in 2.5x the bandwidth, which is critical for compute-heavy workloads. The Arc B570 also supports PCIe 4.0 x8, while the FirePro uses PCIe 3.0 x16, though the latter’s older interface limits data transfer rates.

API support further separates them. The Arc B570 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4. The FirePro W7000 only reaches DirectX 12 (11_1), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.2.170. This means the Arc B570 can run the latest games and applications with advanced features like mesh shaders and variable rate shading, while the FirePro is stuck with a decade-old feature set that limits modern software compatibility.

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The two head-to-head benchmarks in the dataset are Geekbench OpenCL and Geekbench Vulkan, and the Intel Arc B570 wins both by overwhelming margins. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Arc B570 scores 83,514 compared to the FirePro W7000’s 17,808, a delta of 369%. This test measures general-purpose GPU compute across a variety of workloads, and the Arc B570’s 5 nm node, 2,304 shaders, and 380 GB/s bandwidth allow it to process far more data per second. The FirePro’s 28 nm node and 2.432 TFLOPS FP32 performance simply cannot keep pace, even with its 256-bit memory bus.

In Geekbench Vulkan, the Arc B570 scores 96,844 versus 22,001 for the FirePro, a 340.2% lead. Vulkan is a low-overhead API that benefits from modern hardware features like async compute and explicit memory control, both of which the Xe2-HPG architecture supports natively. The FirePro’s GCN 1.0 architecture was designed before Vulkan existed, and its Vulkan 1.2.170 driver support is a compatibility layer rather than a native implementation. The result is a performance gap that exceeds even the compute benchmark, confirming that the Arc B570’s architectural advantages translate directly into real-world API performance.

Looking at the broader benchmark suite, the Arc B570’s average benchmark score is 20,556 across all tests, with notable results including 14,195 in Passmark G3D and 72 in Passmark DirectX 12. The FirePro W7000 has an average score of 19,905 based on its two Geekbench entries, placing it in the same percentile range as the Arc B570. However, this comparison is misleading because the FirePro lacks scores for modern tests like 3DMark Steel Nomad or Passmark DirectX 12, where the Arc B570’s 2,649 and 72 scores would likely far exceed anything the FirePro could produce. The data clearly shows that the Arc B570 is the superior card in every measurable way.

FAQ

Q: Which card has better raw compute performance?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 11.52 TFLOPS FP32 performance versus the AMD FirePro W7000’s 2.432 TFLOPS, a 4.7x advantage. This is reflected in the Geekbench OpenCL score of 83,514 for the Arc versus 17,808 for the FirePro.

Q: Does the FirePro W7000 support ray tracing?

A: No. The AMD FirePro W7000 has no ray tracing cores. The Intel Arc B570 includes 18 dedicated RT cores, enabling hardware-accelerated ray tracing that the FirePro cannot perform.

Q: What memory configurations do these cards have?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 10 GB of GDDR6 on a 160-bit bus with 380.0 GB/s bandwidth. The AMD FirePro W7000 has 4 GB of GDDR5 on a 256-bit bus with 153.6 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which card supports newer graphics APIs?

A: The Intel Arc B570 supports DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2) and Vulkan 1.4, while the AMD FirePro W7000 only supports DirectX 12 (11_1) and Vulkan 1.2.170. The Arc B570 also supports OpenGL 4.6, matching the FirePro.

Q: Are these cards in the same performance percentile?

A: Yes, both are ranked in the 65th percentile among all GPUs. However, the Arc B570’s average benchmark score of 20,556 is higher than the FirePro’s 19,905, and the Arc wins both head-to-head tests.

Q: Which card has higher memory bandwidth?

A: The Intel Arc B570 has 380.0 GB/s bandwidth, which is 2.5x higher than the AMD FirePro W7000’s 153.6 GB/s, despite the FirePro having a wider 256-bit bus versus the Arc’s 160-bit bus.

Specification Differences

| Specification | Intel Arc B570 | AMD FirePro W7000 |

|---|---|---|

| Architecture | Xe2-HPG | GCN 1.0 |

| Process Node | 5 nm | 28 nm |

| Transistors | 19,600 million | 2,800 million |

| Die Size | 272 mm² | 212 mm² |

| Transistor Density | 72.1M / mm² | 13.2M / mm² |

| Shading Units | 2304 | 1280 |

| TMUs | 144 | 80 |

| ROPs | 80 | 32 |

| Ray Tracing Cores | 18 | None |

| FP32 Performance | 11.52 TFLOPS | 2.432 TFLOPS |

| FP16 Performance | 23.04 TFLOPS (2:1) | Not available |

| Memory Size | 10 GB | 4 GB |

| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |

| Memory Bus Width | 160 bit | 256 bit |

| Memory Bandwidth | 380.0 GB/s | 153.6 GB/s |

| Memory Clock | 2375 MHz (19 Gbps effective) | 1200 MHz (4.8 Gbps effective) |

| Pixel Rate | 200.0 GPixel/s | 30.40 GPixel/s |

| Texture Rate | 360.0 GTexel/s | 76.00 GTexel/s |

| TDP | 150 W | 150 W |

| Slot Width | Dual-slot | Single-slot |

| Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin | 1x 6-pin |

| Bus Interface | PCIe 4.0 x8 | PCIe 3.0 x16 |

| Display Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1 | 4x DisplayPort 1.2 |

| DirectX Support | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12 (11_1) |

| Vulkan Support | 1.4 | 1.2.170 |

| Production Status | Active | End-of-life |

| Release Date | 2025-01-15 | 2012-06-12 |

| Launch MSRP | 219 USD | 899 USD |

The Verdict

The Intel Arc B570 is the definitive choice for any modern workload, based solely on the data. It wins both head-to-head benchmarks by margins of 369% (OpenCL) and 340.2% (Vulkan), offers 4.7x the FP32 throughput, and has 2.5x the memory bandwidth of the FirePro W7000. Its 10 GB VRAM doubles the FirePro’s 4 GB, and its support for DirectX 12 Ultimate and Vulkan 1.4 ensures compatibility with current and future software. The launch MSRP of 219 USD also makes it accessible, though this analysis does not weigh pricing.

The AMD FirePro W7000 should only be considered by users running legacy professional applications that require GCN 1.0-specific optimizations or that cannot function with the Arc B570’s newer driver stack. Its single-slot design and 150 W TDP match the Arc’s power draw, but its performance ceiling is far lower. With an end-of-life production status and a release date from 2012, the FirePro is a relic that cannot handle modern compute or graphics demands. The data is unambiguous: the Arc B570 wins every measurable metric, and the FirePro W7000’s only advantage is its narrower physical footprint and older bus interface, which do not compensate for its 4.7x lower compute performance. For anyone choosing between these two, the Arc B570 is the only rational pick.