GPU Comparison
GEFORCE
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
CORE STATE
GT200B
VRAM
896 MB
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
171 W
BUS WIDTH
448 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Tesla 2.0
PROCESS
55 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2008
VS
GPU
S3 Graphics Chrome 530 GT
CORE STATE
Destination 4
VRAM
512 MB
CLOCK SPEED
—
TDP
100 W
BUS WIDTH
64 bit
ARCHITECTURE
Chrome
PROCESS
65 nm
LAUNCH DATE
2008
DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS
SPECIFICATION
GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
S3 Graphics Chrome 530 GT
Core Specs
Shading Units
216
32
-85.2%
Shaders
216
32
-85.2%
TMUs
72
4
-94.4%
ROPs
28
4
-85.7%
Compute Units
—
1
SM Count
27
—
Clocks
GPU Clock
576 MHz
625 MHz
Shader Clock
1242 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz
1998 Mbps effective
500 MHz
1000 Mbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
896 MB
512 MB
VRAM (MB)
896
512
-42.9%
Memory Type
GDDR3
GDDR2
Memory Bus
448 bit
64 bit
Bandwidth
111.9 GB/s
8.000 GB/s
Cache
L2 Cache
224 KB
—
Performance
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
2.500 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
2.500 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
536.5 GFLOPS
57.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
67.07 GFLOPS (1:8)
—
Power
TDP
171 W
100 W
TDP (W)
171
100
-41.5%
Suggested PSU
450 W
300 W
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin
—
Architecture
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Chrome
GPU Name
GT200B
Destination 4
Generation
GeForce 200
Chrome
Process Size
55 nm
65 nm
Transistors
1,400 million
—
Die Size
470 mm²
—
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
3.0M / mm²
—
API Support
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
10.1
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
—
CUDA
1.3
—
Shader Model
4.0
4.1
Physical
Slot Width
Dual-slot
Single-slot
Length
267 mm
10.5 inches
—
Outputs
2x DVI1x S-Video
1x DVI1x HDMI
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
PCIe 2.0 x16
Other
Launch Price
299 USD
—
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
GeForce 9
GammaChrome
Successor
GeForce 400
—