NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla T4 Comparison

NVIDIA
GEFORCE

NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile

CORE STATE GA107
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1140 MHz
TDP 60 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Ampere
nm
PROCESS 8 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2022
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

Tesla T4

CORE STATE TU104
VRAM 16 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1590 MHz
TDP 70 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2018

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl
48,703
61,276
geekbench_vulkan
46,782
72,190

Analysis: NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile vs NVIDIA Tesla T4

Head-to-Head Benchmarks

The recorded data shows a decisive performance advantage for the NVIDIA Tesla T4 across both benchmark tests. In Geekbench OpenCL, the Tesla T4 scores 61,276 points against the RTX A1000 Mobile's 48,703 points, a 25.8% delta in favor of the Tesla T4. The gap widens considerably in Geekbench Vulkan, where the Tesla T4 reaches 72,190 points while the RTX A1000 Mobile manages 46,782, resulting in a 54.3% lead for the Tesla T4. These are not marginal differences; the Vulkan result particularly highlights how the Tesla T4 excels in compute-heavy workloads.

The Tesla T4's average benchmark score of 66,733 places it at the 90th percentile of all GPUs, while the RTX A1000 Mobile's 47,743 average sits at the 85th percentile. That 5-percentile gap may sound modest, but the raw score difference of 18,990 points (39.8% higher for the Tesla T4) tells a more emphatic story. In the head-to-head comparison, the Tesla T4 wins both tests, giving it a 2-0 sweep, with no benchmark where the RTX A1000 Mobile emerges ahead.

Context from the nearest-rival data reinforces the Tesla T4's standing. Its average score of 66,733 is 1.1% above the AMD Radeon VII (66,004) and 2.5% above the NVIDIA Tesla P40 (65,095). It trails the AMD Radeon Instinct MI25 (68,562) by 2.7% and the Intel Arc A770 (68,809) by 3%. The RTX A1000 Mobile, meanwhile, sits in a lower bracket: its 47,743 average is 1.5% below the AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT (48,477), though it edges past the AMD Radeon RX 6550M (46,702) by 2.2%, the Intel Arc A530M (46,614) by 2.4%, and the AMD Radeon RX 5600M (46,601) by 2.5%. In essence, the Tesla T4 competes with desktop-class accelerators from 2018-2019, while the RTX A1000 Mobile aligns with mid-range mobile GPUs from the same era.

The Vulkan delta of 54.3% is the standout figure. It suggests the Tesla T4's architecture handles the Vulkan API's compute and rendering paths with far greater efficiency relative to the RTX A1000 Mobile. The OpenCL delta of 25.8%, while smaller, still represents a substantial margin. Both tests point in the same direction: the Tesla T4 is the stronger compute performer by a wide margin, and no benchmark in the database flips that conclusion.

The Verdict

The data is unambiguous. The NVIDIA Tesla T4 wins every recorded benchmark against the RTX A1000 Mobile, and it does so by margins that range from 25.8% to 54.3%. For any workload measured by Geekbench OpenCL or Vulkan, the Tesla T4 is the superior choice. Its 90th-percentile ranking versus the RTX A1000 Mobile's 85th-percentile ranking reinforces this, as does its average score of 66,733, which is nearly 40% higher than the 47,743 average of the RTX A1000 Mobile.

Who should pick the Tesla T4? Anyone prioritizing raw compute throughput, particularly in Vulkan scenarios, will find the 54.3% advantage decisive. The Tesla T4 also offers 16 GB of GDDR6 memory against the RTX A1000 Mobile's 4 GB, a fourfold capacity difference that matters for large datasets or high-resolution textures. Its 320.0 GB/s memory bandwidth versus 176.0 GB/s further cements its lead in memory-bound tasks. The Tesla T4's pixel rate of 101.8 GPixel/s and texture rate of 254.4 GTexel/s dwarf the RTX A1000 Mobile's 36.48 GPixel/s and 72.96 GTexel/s, respectively.

Who should pick the RTX A1000 Mobile? The data does not favor it in any benchmark, but its profile suggests a different use case. It draws 60 W versus the Tesla T4's 70 W, a modest power saving. It is an IGP (integrated graphics processor) with no slot width, designed for portable devices, whereas the Tesla T4 is a single-slot card with a 168 mm length. The RTX A1000 Mobile also supports PCIe 4.0 x8, double the per-lane bandwidth of the Tesla T4's PCIe 3.0 x16, though the Tesla T4's x16 lane count may compensate. For a mobile workstation where the GPU must fit inside a laptop chassis, the RTX A1000 Mobile is the only viable option; the Tesla T4 cannot be integrated into a portable device. But from a pure performance standpoint, the recorded scores leave no room for debate.

Where Each One Wins

The Tesla T4 wins in every category where the database has measurements. OpenCL compute: 61,276 versus 48,703, a 25.8% lead. Vulkan compute and rendering: 72,190 versus 46,782, a 54.3% lead. Its FP32 throughput of 8.141 TFLOPS is 74% higher than the RTX A1000 Mobile's 4.669 TFLOPS. Its FP16 throughput of 16.28 TFLOPS (2:1 ratio) is nearly 3.5 times the RTX A1000 Mobile's 4.669 TFLOPS (1:1 ratio). The Tesla T4 also carries 40 RT cores and 320 tensor cores, versus 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores on the RTX A1000 Mobile. For ray tracing and AI inference workloads, the Tesla T4 has both more cores and higher raw clock-driven performance.

The RTX A1000 Mobile wins in portability and power efficiency. Its 60 W TDP is 10 W lower than the Tesla T4's 70 W. It is an IGP with no discrete dimensions, meaning it is soldered into a laptop motherboard, while the Tesla T4 requires a 168 mm single-slot card with no display outputs. The RTX A1000 Mobile also has display outputs described as "Portable Device Dependent," allowing it to drive laptop screens, whereas the Tesla T4 has no outputs at all. Its 8 nm process node from Samsung is more advanced than the Tesla T4's 12 nm node from TSMC, leading to a higher transistor density of 43.5M per mm² versus 25.0M per mm². The RTX A1000 Mobile's base clock of 630 MHz is higher than the Tesla T4's 585 MHz, though the Tesla T4's boost clock of 1590 MHz far exceeds the RTX A1000 Mobile's 1140 MHz.

In terms of nearest-rival positioning, the Tesla T4 sits among desktop accelerators like the Radeon VII and Tesla P40, while the RTX A1000 Mobile competes with mobile parts like the RX 6550M and Arc A530M. That placement alone tells you which GPU belongs in a server rack versus a thin-and-light laptop.

FAQ

Q: Which GPU has the higher average benchmark score?

A: The NVIDIA Tesla T4 averages 66,733 points across its recorded benchmarks, while the NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile averages 47,743 points. The Tesla T4's average is about 39.8% higher.

Q: How much faster is the Tesla T4 in Vulkan?

A: In Geekbench Vulkan, the Tesla T4 scores 72,190 against the RTX A1000 Mobile's 46,782, a 54.3% advantage for the Tesla T4.

Q: What is the memory capacity difference?

A: The Tesla T4 has 16 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 256-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX A1000 Mobile has 4 GB of GDDR6 memory on a 128-bit bus with 176.0 GB/s bandwidth.

Q: Which GPU has more tensor cores?

A: The Tesla T4 has 320 tensor cores, compared to 64 tensor cores on the RTX A1000 Mobile. The Tesla T4 also has 40 RT cores versus 16 on the RTX A1000 Mobile.

Q: Does the RTX A1000 Mobile have a lower power draw?

A: Yes, the RTX A1000 Mobile has a 60 W TDP, while the Tesla T4 has a 70 W TDP. The RTX A1000 Mobile is also an IGP, while the Tesla T4 is a single-slot card.

Q: Which GPU is better for a portable laptop?

A: The RTX A1000 Mobile is designed for portability with its IGP form factor and "Portable Device Dependent" display outputs. The Tesla T4 has no display outputs and requires a 168 mm card, making it unsuitable for laptops.

Architecture Differences

The two GPUs come from different NVIDIA generations. The Tesla T4 uses the TU104 chip on the Turing architecture, fabricated on a 12 nm process at TSMC, with 13,600 million transistors on a 545 mm² die. The RTX A1000 Mobile uses the GA107 chip on the Ampere architecture, fabricated on an 8 nm process at Samsung, with 8,700 million transistors on a 200 mm² die. The process node difference explains the density gap: 25.0M transistors per mm² for the Tesla T4 versus 43.5M per mm² for the RTX A1000 Mobile.

The Tesla T4 belongs to the "Tesla Turing (Txx)" generation, with its predecessor listed as Tesla Volta and successor as Server Ampere. The RTX A1000 Mobile belongs to the "Ampere-MW (Ax000)" generation, with its predecessor as Quadro Turing-M and successor as Ada-MW. These lineage differences reflect target markets: the Tesla T4 is a server accelerator, while the RTX A1000 Mobile is a mobile workstation part.

Core counts differ substantially. The Tesla T4 has 2,560 shading units, 160 TMUs, and 64 ROPs. The RTX A1000 Mobile has 2,048 shading units, 64 TMUs, and 32 ROPs. The Tesla T4's pixel rate of 101.8 GPixel/s is nearly triple the RTX A1000 Mobile's 36.48 GPixel/s, and its texture rate of 254.4 GTexel/s is more than triple the 72.96 GTexel/s. FP32 throughput stands at 8.141 TFLOPS for the Tesla T4 versus 4.669 TFLOPS for the RTX A1000 Mobile. FP16 performance is even more lopsided: the Tesla T4 delivers 16.28 TFLOPS with a 2:1 ratio, while the RTX A1000 Mobile delivers 4.669 TFLOPS with a 1:1 ratio, meaning the Tesla T4 has full-rate FP16 while the RTX A1000 Mobile does not.

Both GPUs support DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_2), OpenGL 4.6, and Vulkan 1.4, so API compatibility is identical. The Tesla T4 uses PCIe 3.0 x16, while the RTX A1000 Mobile uses PCIe 4.0 x8. The Tesla T4 has no display outputs; the RTX A1000 Mobile's outputs depend on the portable device. The Tesla T4's release date is September 12, 2018, versus March 29, 2022, for the RTX A1000 Mobile, a gap of roughly three and a half years.

Specification Differences

The most consequential differences are in memory and compute resources. The Tesla T4 offers 16 GB of GDDR6 on a 256-bit bus with 320.0 GB/s bandwidth. The RTX A1000 Mobile offers 4 GB of GDDR6 on a 128-bit bus with 176.0 GB/s bandwidth. Memory clocks differ as well: the Tesla T4 runs at 1250 MHz (10 Gbps effective), while the RTX A1000 Mobile runs at 1375 MHz (11 Gbps effective). The RTX A1000 Mobile's higher memory clock does not compensate for its narrower bus.

Clock speeds show a split. The Tesla T4 has a 585 MHz base clock and a 1590 MHz boost clock. The RTX A1000 Mobile has a 630 MHz base clock and a 1140 MHz boost clock. The higher boost on the Tesla T4 drives most of its performance advantage. Power consumption is close: 70 W for the Tesla T4, 60 W for the RTX A1000 Mobile. The Tesla T4 lists a suggested PSU of 250 W, while the RTX A1000 Mobile has no suggested PSU due to its IGP nature.

Form factors diverge sharply. The Tesla T4 is a single-slot card measuring 168 mm (6.6 inches) in length with no power connectors required. The RTX A1000 Mobile is an IGP with no dimensions listed and no power connectors. Bus interfaces differ: PCIe 3.0 x16 for the Tesla T4, PCIe 4.0 x8 for the RTX A1000 Mobile. Display outputs: none for the Tesla T4, "Portable Device Dependent" for the RTX A1000 Mobile. Both are end-of-life products. The Tesla T4 has 40 RT cores and 320 tensor cores; the RTX A1000 Mobile has 16 RT cores and 64 tensor cores. Transistor counts are 13,600 million versus 8,700 million, and die sizes are 545 mm² versus 200 mm², respectively.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
RTX A1000 Mobile
Tesla T4
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,048
2,560 +25.0%
Shaders
2,048
2,560 +25.0%
TMUs
64
160 +150.0%
ROPs
32
64 +100.0%
SM Count
16
40 +150.0%
Clocks
Base Clock
630 MHz
585 MHz
Boost Clock
1140 MHz
1590 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz 11 Gbps effective
1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
4 GB
16 GB
VRAM (MB)
4,096
16,384 +300.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
128 bit
256 bit
Bandwidth
176.0 GB/s
320.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
2 MB
4 MB
Performance
Pixel Rate
36.48 GPixel/s
101.8 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
72.96 GTexel/s
254.4 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
4.669 TFLOPS
8.141 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
72.96 GFLOPS (1:64)
254.4 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
4.669 TFLOPS (1:1)
16.28 TFLOPS (2:1)
AI/RT
RT Cores
16
40 +150.0%
Tensor Cores
64
320 +400.0%
Power
TDP
60 W
70 W
TDP (W)
60
70 +16.7%
Suggested PSU
250 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
Ampere
Turing
GPU Name
GA107
TU104
Generation
Ampere-MW (Ax000)
Tesla Turing (Txx)
Process Size
8 nm
12 nm
Transistors
8,700 million
13,600 million
Die Size
200 mm²
545 mm²
Foundry
Samsung
TSMC
Density
43.5M / mm²
25.0M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
12 Ultimate (12_2)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
3.0
3.0
CUDA
8.6
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.9
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
Single-slot
Length
168 mm 6.6 inches
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
No outputs
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Turing-M
Tesla Volta
Successor
Ada-MW
Server Ampere
View RTX A1000 Mobile Details View Tesla T4 Details