GPU Comparison

AMD

RADEON

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

CORE STATE Navi 23

VRAM 8 GB

CLOCK SPEED 2416 MHz

TDP 120 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE RDNA 2.0

PROCESS 7 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2022

NVIDIA

GEFORCE

T600

CORE STATE TU117

VRAM 4 GB

CLOCK SPEED 1335 MHz

TDP 40 W

BUS WIDTH 128 bit

ARCHITECTURE Turing

PROCESS 12 nm

LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_opencl

65,800

27,875

geekbench_vulkan

77,735

25,580

passmark_directx_10

N/A

passmark_directx_11

N/A

passmark_directx_12

N/A

passmark_directx_9

N/A

114

passmark_g2d

N/A

756

passmark_g3d

N/A

6,479

passmark_gpu_compute

N/A

2,402

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6650M vs NVIDIA T600

Examining the test figures for AMD's RX 6650 graphics and NVIDIA T600 from NVIDIA, a clear pattern appears. AMD's RX 6650 graphics reliably provides superior frame rates in every benchmarking. The performance lead ranges from considerable to remarkable according to the particular title. Such consistency attests to fundamental design improvements. Buyers prioritizing rendering capability should pay attention.

Game performance results over diverse scenarios repeatedly favor AMD's RX 6650 graphics. Whether it's competitive games to demanding games, AMD's RX 6650 graphics preserves its advantage. This benchmark dependability in various titles shows core architectural superiority. Gamers might anticipate strong results no matter of scenario. This capability is impressive.

Overall, AMD's RX 6650 graphics represents the better selection in this matchup. The benchmark leads warrant examination for those assembling a capable graphics system. While NVIDIA T600 from NVIDIA features its strengths, the performance figures obviously favors AMD's RX 6650 graphics. Make your selection considering this. The gaming margin is considerable sufficiently to affect.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION

RX 6650M

T600

Core Specs

Shading Units

1,792

640 -64.3%

Shaders

1,792

640 -64.3%

TMUs

112

40 -64.3%

ROPs

32 -50.0%

Compute Units

—

SM Count

—

Clocks

Base Clock

2068 MHz

735 MHz

Boost Clock

2416 MHz

1335 MHz

Game Clock

2222 MHz

—

Memory Clock

1750 MHz 14 Gbps effective

1250 MHz 10 Gbps effective

Memory

Memory Size

8 GB

4 GB

VRAM (MB)

8,192

4,096 -50.0%

Memory Type

GDDR6

Memory Bus

128 bit

Bandwidth

224.0 GB/s

160.0 GB/s

Cache

L1 Cache

128 KB per Array

64 KB (per SM)

L2 Cache

2 MB

1024 KB

L3 Cache

32 MB

—

L0 Cache

32 KB per WGP

—

Performance

Pixel Rate

154.6 GPixel/s

42.72 GPixel/s

Texture Rate

270.6 GTexel/s

53.40 GTexel/s

FP32 (TFLOPS)

8.659 TFLOPS

1.709 TFLOPS

FP64 (TFLOPS)

541.2 GFLOPS (1:16)

53.40 GFLOPS (1:32)

FP16 (TFLOPS)

17.32 TFLOPS (2:1)

3.418 TFLOPS (2:1)

AI/RT

RT Cores

—

Power

TDP

120 W

40 W

TDP (W)

120

40 -66.7%

Suggested PSU

—

200 W

Power Connectors

None

Architecture

RDNA 2.0

Turing

GPU Name

Navi 23

TU117

Generation

Navi Mobile (RX 6000M)

Quadro Turing (Tx000)

Process Size

7 nm

12 nm

Transistors

11,060 million

4,700 million

Die Size

237 mm²

200 mm²

Foundry

TSMC

Density

46.7M / mm²

23.5M / mm²

API Support

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

12 (12_1)

OpenGL

4.6

Vulkan

1.4

OpenCL

2.1

3.0

CUDA

—

7.5

Shader Model

6.8

Physical

Slot Width

IGP

Single-slot

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x8

PCIe 3.0 x16

Other

Production

End-of-life

Predecessor

Polaris Mobile

Quadro Volta

Successor

—

Workstation Ampere

View Radeon RX 6650M Details View T600 Details

GPU Comparison

AMD Radeon RX 6650M

T600

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

Analysis: AMD Radeon RX 6650M vs NVIDIA T600

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

Related Graphics Cards

Related Comparisons