GPU Comparison

AMD
RADEON

AMD Radeon Pro 5700

CORE STATE Navi 10
VRAM 8 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1350 MHz
TDP 130 W
BUS WIDTH 256 bit
ARCHITECTURE RDNA 1.0
nm
PROCESS 7 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2020
VS
NVIDIA
GEFORCE

T600 Mobile

CORE STATE TU117
VRAM 4 GB
CLOCK SPEED 1410 MHz
TDP 40 W
BUS WIDTH 128 bit
ARCHITECTURE Turing
nm
PROCESS 12 nm
LAUNCH DATE 2021

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKS

geekbench_metal
60,126
N/A
geekbench_opencl
52,787
35,486
geekbench_vulkan
51,289
30,211
passmark_directx_10
71
N/A
passmark_directx_11
78
N/A
passmark_directx_12
48
N/A
passmark_directx_9
143
N/A
passmark_g2d
805
N/A
passmark_g3d
11,583
N/A
passmark_gpu_compute
4,961
N/A

Analysis: AMD Radeon Pro 5700 vs NVIDIA T600 Mobile

Rendering performance benchmarks between Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700 and NVIDIA T600 Mobile demonstrate a decisive winner. Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700 provides notably higher benchmark scores throughout contemporary games. The VRAM edge and design advances translate into visibly enhanced gaming performance. Benchmark numbers demonstrates this conclusion. Gamers seeking top-tier graphics will pay attention.

This memory benefit of Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700 turns progressively significant at demanding settings. Demanding rendering consumes notable graphics memory, and Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700 has more capacity. This leads into smoother frame rates in demanding scenarios. Next-gen releases might continually need greater video memory. The superiority increases over generations.

Gaming tests over different titles steadily advantage Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700. Whether it's esports games to heavy games, Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700 keeps its superiority. This performance steadiness in various games proves underlying technical superiority. Users might anticipate excellent frame rates independent of genre. The adaptability is impressive.

NVIDIA T600 Mobile isn't overlooked altogether, yet the performance deficit versus Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700 is hard to deny. For cost-sensitive buyers, NVIDIA T600 Mobile might nonetheless offer a choice if its smaller cost adjusts for the reduced power. That said, for pure visual throughput, Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700 represents the obvious choice. This conclusion is clear. Speed enthusiasts should lean toward Radeon AMD Radeon Pro 5700.

DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS

SPECIFICATION
Pro 5700
T600 Mobile
Core Specs
Shading Units
2,304
896 -61.1%
Shaders
2,304
896 -61.1%
TMUs
144
56 -61.1%
ROPs
64
32 -50.0%
Compute Units
36
SM Count
14
Clocks
Base Clock
1243 MHz
780 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1410 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
1500 MHz 12 Gbps effective
Memory
Memory Size
8 GB
4 GB
VRAM (MB)
8,192
4,096 -50.0%
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Memory Bus
256 bit
128 bit
Bandwidth
384.0 GB/s
192.0 GB/s
Cache
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
L2 Cache
4 MB
1024 KB
Performance
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
45.12 GPixel/s
Texture Rate
194.4 GTexel/s
78.96 GTexel/s
FP32 (TFLOPS)
6.221 TFLOPS
2.527 TFLOPS
FP64 (TFLOPS)
388.8 GFLOPS (1:16)
78.96 GFLOPS (1:32)
FP16 (TFLOPS)
12.44 TFLOPS (2:1)
5.053 TFLOPS (2:1)
Power
TDP
130 W
40 W
TDP (W)
130
40 -69.2%
Suggested PSU
300 W
Power Connectors
None
None
Architecture
Architecture
RDNA 1.0
Turing
GPU Name
Navi 10
TU117
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac (Navi Series)
Quadro Turing-M (Tx000)
Process Size
7 nm
12 nm
Transistors
10,300 million
4,700 million
Die Size
251 mm²
200 mm²
Foundry
TSMC
TSMC
Density
41.0M / mm²
23.5M / mm²
API Support
DirectX
12 (12_1)
12 (12_1)
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Vulkan
1.4
1.4
OpenCL
2.1
3.0
CUDA
7.5
Shader Model
6.8
6.8
Physical
Slot Width
IGP
IGP
Outputs
No outputs
Portable Device Dependent
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
PCIe 3.0 x16
Other
Production
End-of-life
End-of-life
Predecessor
Quadro Pascal-M
Successor
Ampere-MW
View Radeon Pro 5700 Details View T600 Mobile Details